Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Pierre-Yves Lapersonne ( pylapp@programming.dev )  to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 11 months ago

Chat Control approved: Certain EU countries will see your private messages. Is yours on the list?

euroweeklynews.com

external-link
message-square
32
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • nyheder@feddit.dk
  • privacy@programming.dev
243
external-link

Chat Control approved: Certain EU countries will see your private messages. Is yours on the list?

euroweeklynews.com

Pierre-Yves Lapersonne ( pylapp@programming.dev )  to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 11 months ago
message-square
32
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • nyheder@feddit.dk
  • privacy@programming.dev
Chat Control: EU will see your private messages
euroweeklynews.com
external-link
EU governments have finally agreed on a controversial new law that gives a backdoor to reading text messages and viewing photo messages
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • dave ( dave@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    11 months ago

    Countries which support the implementation of Chat Control:

    Spain, Romania, Portugal, Malta Lithuania, Hungary, Ireland, France, Denmark, Croatia, Cyprus, and Bulgaria.

    Countries that are undecided:

    Belgium, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Slovakia, and Sweden.

    Countries which oppose Chat Control:

    Slovenia, the Netherlands, Poland, Luxembourg, Germany, Estonia, Finland, the Czech Republic, and Austria

    • Kroko ( Kroko@feddit.online ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      11 months ago

      “This list is outdated, see here fightchatcontrol.eu”

      • Cleo ☭ ( CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fuck, only 4 are against

    • curious_dolphin ( curious_dolphin@slrpnk.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Can someone help me understand the likely outcome in countries that implement chat control? Will those governments force Google and Apple to remove apps that do not comply (e.g. Signal) from their official app stores? Will those governments somehow detect users who find workarounds and go after them? I figure most people in those countries will shrug their shoulders and move on with their lives, but how will this impact citizens who do not wish to comply?

  • schnurrito ( schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    11 months ago

    misleading headline, this isn’t a list of countries in which the law will (if it passes) be different (it won’t be, it’s an EU law, so will be the same in all EU countries), it’s a list of countries that currently support/oppose the law

    • unwarlikeExtortion ( unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 months ago

      It isn’t misleading (that’d be a technically true headline, which this isn’t). This is a downright lie, or as some might say, “fake news”.

    • themurphy ( themurphy@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      (it won’t be, it’s an EU law, so will be the same in all EU countries)

      This is not true btw. It’s not a mandatory law, and if you read the news about this the last 3 weeks, you would know that.

      EU laws are not automatically mandatory. That’s not how it works at all.

      • schnurrito ( schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        The law will be the same in all EU countries, including whichever parts you think will be “not mandatory” (I did read those news articles and am fully aware that mandatory scanning is no longer on the table).

  • truthfultemporarily ( truthfultemporarily@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m missing a bit the fact that this is not a law yet. This is the position of the commission, which the parliament will then need to approve and has to get past the ECHR as well most likely.

  • fubbernuckin ( fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    And here I was thinking the EU was winning its fight against authoritarianism. Guess nowhere is safe, everyone’s gotta push back no matter where you are. Fucking exhausting that they can’t just leave us the fuck alone.

  • Nutomic ( nutomic@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    EU officials are, incidentally, exempt from chat monitoring – which is quite convenient for someone like von der Leyen. Their communication is explicitly NOT to be monitored. The mere fact that those who drafted this law don’t want it to apply to them tells you everything you need to know about it.

    https://x.com/martinsonneborn/status/1995182586612609241

    • mirshafie ( mirshafie@europe.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      These pathetic morons think they’ll be safe through this exemption. In reality these deliberate security holes will affect everyone. How will these morons be safe when every person they have contact with IRL is a walking microphone for every foreign intelligence agency?

  • sibachian ( sibachian@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 months ago

    people miss the most important problem with this. chat control is a fascist tool that can and will be used against us minorities. this is especially dangerous when more and more countries are starting to lean right.

    hitler would have had a field day with this kind of tech.

    • Matt ( DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Danes are fascist, they pushed it through.

      • sibachian ( sibachian@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        danes are sucking thiels cock for their own wicked reasons.

        as we’ve always said; never trust a dane!

    • wooffersyt ( wooffersyt@lemmings.world ) BannedBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Removed by mod

  • PortNull ( portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    The one good thing of brexit: UK isn’t beholden to this.

    The bad thing is that their own laws aren’t much better. And of course all the other brexit bad stuff

    • Matt ( DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      From the Online Safety Act Wikipedia page:

      The act also requires platforms – including end-to-end encrypted message providers – to scan for child pornography and terrorism content, which experts say is not possible to implement without undermining users’ privacy.

  • gandalf_der_12te ( gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    For years the plan was to make this scanning mandatory. In early November 2025, however, the Danish government amended the text: scanning is now “voluntary” for individual EU states to decide upon. That small word change was enough for the 27 EU countries to agree on November 26.

    If chat control would have been made mandatory, you can bet (and i’d be willing to bet a lot of money on it) that you’re going to have AfD in germany and FPÖ in austria (since they’re already pretty anti-EU) making a lot of noise about how evil the EU is for infringing on people’s privacy. (And they would be right about this, as much as i don’t like to agree with them.) This would give them more votes, than they already have.

    Making it voluntary is a clever trick of the EU to not make yourself extremely unpopular among the population. Well done, i’d say.

    • just_an_average_joe ( just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      AfD is already #1 party in Germany

    • Ferk ( Ferk@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It seems the article is misinterpreting things. It’s not that it’s “voluntary for individual EU states”… but rather “voluntary” for service providers. The service providers don’t have to implement this chat detection if they don’t want to.

      The thing is that if they don’t pass something like this, then by April 2026 a bunch of current services that are already doing CP detection would be breaking the law, since the temporary derogation of the e-Privacy Directive will expire. But I don’t think this affects services like signal/simplex who voluntarily choose to not try to detect it.

  • moretruth ( moretruth@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wow, this is bad. I thought this was over when Germany chose not to support it. Apparently not!

    • Ferk ( Ferk@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I believe Germany is now in favor of this new proposal, according to https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

      Only Italy, Netherlands, Czech Republic and Poland are against. This seems to be based on “leaked documents from the September 12 meeting of the EU Council’s Law Enforcement Working Party”.

    • Asfalttikyntaja ( Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Show is not over until the fat lady sings.

  • chaoticnumber ( chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Dear mods, watch what you remove from these chats, our freedoms are getting fucked, people should be allowed to be indignant.

    That being said i hope the legislators sit on cacti all day every day, those fucking assholes are exempt from this bullshit.

    They will take my data out of my cold dead hands. It was a matter of time, sure, but I was actually holding on to hope for this one. I am pissed, dismayed even.

    Session, signal, simplex are your friends. If those give up the ghost and bend the knee then we are going back to irc and aliases. Fucking shit!

  • Giraffe ( Giraffe@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • Matt ( DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Now let’s hope Parliament will still vote against it.

    • Hirom ( Hirom@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Caling your MEP is more efficient.

  • dontblink ( dontblink@feddit.it ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    OK I’m getting a flip phone

  • wooffersyt ( wooffersyt@lemmings.world ) BannedBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Removed by mod

    • smiletolerantly ( smiletolerantly@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Matrix will not be affected. At all.

      CP is just a pretext here.

    • furry toaster ( protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      this also does nothing to pgp encrypted email, or criminal with a brain cell capable of encrypting the files before sending it

  • birdwing ( birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Every single person that voted in favour must be held on corruption charges. No running free.

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 750 users / week
  • 2.19K users / month
  • 6.63K users / 6 months
  • 851 local subscribers
  • 51.4K subscribers
  • 4.57K Posts
  • 59.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t ( k_o_t@lemmy.ml ) 
  • tmpod ( tmpod@lemmy.pt ) 
  • Yayannick ( Yayannick@lemmy.ml ) 
  • ranok ( ranok@sopuli.xyz ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code