Mozilla is in a tricky position. It contains both a nonprofit organization dedicated to making the internet a better place for everyone, and a for-profit arm dedicated to, you know, making money. In the best of times, these things feed each other: The company makes great products that advance its goals for the web, and the nonprofit gets to both advocate for a better web and show people what it looks like. But these are not the best of times. Mozilla has spent the last couple of years implementing layoffs and restructuring, attempting to explain how it can fight for privacy and openness when Google pays most of its bills, while trying to find its place in an increasingly frothy AI landscape.
Fun times to be the new Mozilla CEO, right? But when I put all that to Anthony Enzor-DeMeo, the company’s just-announced chief executive, he swears he sees opportunity in all the upheaval. “I think what’s actually needed now is a technology company that people can trust,” Enzor-DeMeo says. “What I’ve seen with AI is an erosion of trust.”
Mozilla is not going to train its own giant LLM anytime soon. But there’s still an AI Mode coming to Firefox next year, which Enzor-DeMeo says will offer users their choice of model and product, all in a browser they can understand and from a company they can trust. “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.”
-_-
so many people focusing on the ai part and not this part:
He’s also bullish that things like built-in VPN and a privacy service called Monitor can get more people to pay for their browser. He says he could begin to block ad blockers in Firefox and estimates that’d bring in another $150 million , but he doesn’t want to do that. It feels off-mission.
He doesn’t want to do that, yet…
The biggest firefox extensions are adblockers and other tracker blockers.
What the absolute fuck is going on over there?
Anyone not working in stock trading/investing who uses the term “bullish” to describe how they feel about something that’s not itself a financial market is just indicating that they are a terminally-online crypto-bro, or have been heavily influenced by the memes of that community.
I’m not surprised a cretin like this would completely miss the USP of the company that they were put in charge of.
he actually got started in the real estate market so close enough
If he blocks ad-blockers on Firefox, that will be the end of Firefox. I would personally just move to a Chromium based browser that has ad-blocking allowed by default.
deleted by creator
I don’t think a Mozilla VPN nor Monitor could get Firefox income. When it comes to VPN’s I’m more trusting of a VPN-first company, and Monitor is something I’ve never even heard of.
Don’t know how blocking adblockers would get Mozilla more money.
monitor is basically a dark web, er, monitoring service so it could be monitized but doing so is also kinda creepy, considering the whole point is to monitor breeches.
Mozilla needs so much to stop having a fucking CEO who gets paid millions and start using that money to improve the browser.
Yes, every neo-liberal ceo they have had, are dragging mozilla towards a full commercial strategy, while loosing market shares af! I don’t think US have many non-neo-liberal leader types…Anyway, they and their anti-community attitudes have the full responsibility for the multi-year dive.
The more you pay for a CEO, the worse said CEO is.
There’s no money in improving the browser
deleted by creator
How is it that no CEO sees the writing on the wall and goes “you know what? Everyone’s sick of AI and it’s a great opportunity for PR if we just said we’re NOT going to integrate AI anytime soon.”
That will actually differentiate your company from the sea of “embracing AI as the future” everyone else is doing. Especially for an open source company, surely they’ve done user demographic studies and realized that they have more anti-AI users than most mainstream software, why not cater to them when no one else is, and secure their good will?
Everyone’s sick of AI
But not everyone are ! But a group of people have gone to the ‘hate the tool’ corner, are very aggressive and feel that ‘everybody else hates it’. But ‘we’/‘they’ don’t - some do.
Any software/tool that leaves it up to the user if they want to use such a feature or not, are okay. Open source and Foss doesn’t exclude the use of AI, and ‘catering’ to a special group of angry people that just want to remove the option entirely for everyone else, is not very ‘community’ aligned in my view.
There will be plenty of clones that pull out this or that part of the official source tree, so nobody will lack a normal browser. I currently use ‘Zen’ and I had to ‘force’ AI on. Other will just remove it entirely.
Still, I feel this would have been much better received if they made an extension. That’s literally the point of having an extension system, so people can download optional features they like without it being forced on everyone. Nothing about their AI features I’ve seen requires direct integration with the app and can’t be done with the already very powerful extension APIs (then again I didn’t develop it so there could be details I’m missing).
Or if it supported custom Ollama APIs as an option, so people can host their own AI. People tend to be more supportive of that since you directly control both your data and the energy consumption. Instead your options are the biggest commercial cloud AI providers that people have by far the most problem with. For something like summarizing a webpage a small local model running on CPU works fine. If they truly see generative AI as the future, then they should know there’s more to the technology than just using commercial APIs.
I actually don’t blanket hate generative AI as a whole, but their implementation of it is the exact same as every other software company and has all the same problems with no unique solutions that differentiate Firefox from proprietary browsers with much more mature AI features. That’s what I don’t like about the direction they’re going. If you specifically want AI in your browser, there’s no reason to go with Firefox over Chrome or Edge; if you care about privacy or FOSS, AI on Firefox is no better because you still can’t use an open source model you control; and if you hate any generative AI in general, they’ve just alienated you, possibly permanently, by including it by default. Firefox keeps wanting to be like the mainstream browsers while forgetting about the niche that’s allowed them to thrive when every other browser fell to Chrome.
deleted by creator
Ah yes, just like Vivaldi is now the #1 browser now that they’ve adopted this strategy.
If they were smart they would hedge and use AI but not call it AI. Actually build a product that leverages AI and give it an appropriate name.
deleted by creator
Just let me turn it off if I want to, and we’re cool. Because I like the rest of Firefox.
I wouldn’t mind if they added integration for ollama, but right now the feature is useless to me as they only seem to have the major commercial LLMs integrated.
No, you can access something like ‘localhost:8080’, so if you have your ollama/webui or other agent/llm listening there, FF will show that interface in the side window. Summary etc still works. You just chose ‘localhost’ as your provider.
Better search, but it looks like this: browser.ml.chat.provider http://192.168.1.83:8080/
deleted by creator
I have used firefox for a very long time and have taken a lot of “controversy’s” with a grain of salt but this feels a bit to much like windows 11 and the you can turn it off is hitting me about the same. I may need to find an alternative but the browser space is not great. Going to likely be the projects that keep up with firefox/chrome but pull out the bs.
deleted by creator
