Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
🌈 vanta rainbow black 🌈 ( vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone )  to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months ago

mastodon age verification

cyberpunk.lol

external-link
message-square
31
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • mastodon@lemmy.ml
  • fediverse@lemmy.ml
39
external-link

mastodon age verification

cyberpunk.lol

🌈 vanta rainbow black 🌈 ( vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone )  to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months ago
message-square
31
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • mastodon@lemmy.ml
  • fediverse@lemmy.ml
🌈 vanta rainbow black 🌈 (@vantablack@cyberpunk.lol)
cyberpunk.lol
external-link
Attached: 1 image WHAT the FUCK mastodon?!?!?!?! do NOT do the fucking age verification bullshit what the fuck is wrong with you https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/02/connecting-the-world-through-thriving-online-communities/ #AgeVerification #mastodon #MastoAdmin #FediAdmin #fediverse

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/02/connecting-the-world-through-thriving-online-communities/

alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • PiraHxCx ( PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m all pro Age Verification, the good old “If you are over 18 click yes”

    • rants_unnecessarily ( rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      We need old school Leisure Suite Larry age verification questions asking things like, “Where were you on 9/11”, or “What’s George Bush’s middle name’s first letter?”

      • YiddishMcSquidish ( YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If someone is eighteen today, they would’ve been negative eight years old during 9/11.

        • rants_unnecessarily ( rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Tough! Better luck with the next question. Luckily it’s best out of 3.

  • MentalEdge ( MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean… They have to.

    Countries are making it law, so sooner or later, fedi projects are going to have to deal with that crap.

    • Skavau ( Skavau@piefed.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      Do they? There’s one thing to make it law, another thing to enforce it. OSA in the UK has been around since last July and managed to do nothing other than pick a fight with 4chan and get nowhere. I seem to recall someone mentioned Lemmy to Ofcom in a discussion regarding OSA and they were literally like “What’s a Lemmy?”

      How on earth do you imagine a regulator is going to work out how to deal with 50+ federated instances (for instance)?

      • MentalEdge ( MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean if they can really just do nothing, then that is also something it would be good to be sure about.

        Nintendo has shown that it is possible to attack open source projects at the repository level, and while that wouldn’t necessarily stop development, it would be a step down to force development technically “underground”.

        And if instances have to start being regularly replaced, that WILL cause attrition.

        • Skavau ( Skavau@piefed.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I just think this is a logistical dead-end for regulators who may rely on the chilling effect of the thought of being targeted rather than actually being targeted. Unless the Fediverse somehow becomes massive, I don’t see that it’ll ever enter their eyes. Especially as many places will be based in the USA who is the least likely country to implement these laws, and the most hostile to any threats from foreign regulators (see again the 4chan example).

          • MentalEdge ( MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Especially as many places will be based in the USA who is the least likely

            uh, what?

            • Skavau ( Skavau@piefed.social ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yes? USA is the least likely to do this. Porn laws in various states don’t apply to social media.

              Other attempts have been stuck in legislative hell, been unenforced or have court cases challenging their legality (Mississipi)

              • Twongo [she/her] ( Twongo@lemmy.ml ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                US Tech firms profit the most from it, the verification data lands on some palantir server - as the recent discord fiasco implied.

                • Skavau ( Skavau@piefed.social ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Whether they do so optionally is a different thing entirely, to be fair.

              • MentalEdge ( MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Not even two weeks later, California is making OS level age verification a thing.

                • Skavau ( Skavau@piefed.social ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I’m not even sure how that is remotely enforceable, although this also is a somewhat different thing to what this thread is about.

        • ageedizzle ( ageedizzle@piefed.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • bonn2 ( bonn2@lemmy.zip ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Probably talking about Nintendos recent re-crackdown on the repos of Switch emulators.

    • MrSoup ( MrSoup@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Still waiting for wikipedia to block itself in UK.

      • Skavau ( Skavau@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wikipedia took UK to court over the fear of being targeted, it was dismissed purely on the basis of “Well they haven’t done anything to you yet”. And Ofcom clearly hasn’t got the balls to do it.

  • ISOmorph ( ISOmorph@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not worried. Either it’ll only affect their dedicated servers. Or it’ll be integrated into mastodon itself and then quickly forked.

  • kylian0087 ( kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    We shut migratie everything to I2P and Tor.

  • WhatSaid ( WhatSaid@lem.ugh.im ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t be lawful evil, be neutral good. Or even chaotic good.

  • T (they/she) ( Templa@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I am failing to see how the highlighted text is saying that they will implement it. My understanding is that they are evaluating yhe situation. Am I wrong?

  • MonkderVierte ( MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    deleted by creator

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1.44K users / month
  • 6.41K users / 6 months
  • 852 local subscribers
  • 51.4K subscribers
  • 4.57K Posts
  • 59.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t ( k_o_t@lemmy.ml ) 
  • tmpod ( tmpod@lemmy.pt ) 
  • Yayannick ( Yayannick@lemmy.ml ) 
  • ranok ( ranok@sopuli.xyz ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code