Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
copacetic ( copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de )  to rpg@ttrpg.networkEnglish · 6 months ago

TTRPG Wiki — Compare Tabletop RPG Systems

ttrpgwiki.com

external-link
message-square
7
link
fedilink
28
external-link

TTRPG Wiki — Compare Tabletop RPG Systems

ttrpgwiki.com

copacetic ( copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de )  to rpg@ttrpg.networkEnglish · 6 months ago
message-square
7
link
fedilink
Compare 243+ Tabletop RPG Systems — TTRPG Wiki
ttrpgwiki.com
external-link
Compare 243+ tabletop RPG systems side by side: filter by genre, complexity, cost, and play style. From D&D and Pathfinder to Call of Cthulhu and indie games.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • iamthetot ( iamthetot@piefed.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    See Pathfinder 2e is “high” complexity, check Lancer, “high” complexity… Bruh what is very high then?

    • ...m... ( myrrh@ttrpg.network ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • BentiGorlich ( BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Do you know what is meant by accessibility? I would have thought it is just an inverse score for complexity (high complexity -> low accessibility and vice versa)

    • copacetic ( copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The site has this description:

      Complexity — How many rules and subsystems players need to learn

      Accessibility — How easy it is to find rules, starter sets, and learning resources

      Community — Size and activity of the player community and third-party content

      • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is nice but I wish you could filter by sort levels as well.

      • BentiGorlich ( BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thanks, I couldn’t find it… But I do not understand their rating of Savage worlds. You can play it with really basic rules and it still works fine. Its one of the core strengths of that system 😅

    • roflo1 ( roflo1@ttrpg.network ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Huh. Didn’t pay much attention myself, but perhaps they meant to convey “availability” instead?

  • Scallops ( Scallops@ttrpg.network ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hate the name, though. Nothing about that site is a Wiki. Call it TTRPG Catalog, Folio, whatever. If there’s no way to directly edit anything, it’s not a wiki. (And no, I don’t think a wiki would be a good idea for a website of this kind.)

rpg@ttrpg.network

rpg@ttrpg.network

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !rpg@ttrpg.network

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

  • Do not distribute pirate content
  • Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
  • Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
  • Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
  • Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
  • Do not advertise for livestreams
  • Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
  • Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
  • No Zak S content.
  • Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.
  • No AI-generated content. Discussion of AI generation pertaining to RPGs is explicitly allowed.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 13 users / week
  • 54 users / month
  • 364 users / 6 months
  • 82 local subscribers
  • 5.01K subscribers
  • 699 Posts
  • 2.64K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • sirblastalot ( sirblastalot@ttrpg.network ) 
  • TripHammer ( TripHammer@ttrpg.network ) 
  • Primarch ( Primarch@ttrpg.network ) 
  • BrentTaylor ( BrentTaylor@ttrpg.network ) 
  • Avogadro ( Avogadro@ttrpg.network ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code