• azezeB ( azezeB@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not vegan or vegeterian. But I feel like that “unless you are doing both” is kinda a wrong argument to make, even almost bad faith.

    Because i could say “ah so you are anti work abuse? Curious, you are using a phone made by leveraging abuse”

    I think a more honest argument would be to weight the possibilities and the outcomes.

    Producing meat does increase the carbon footprint, and the same can be said for flying.

    The idea is, how much can beign vegan reduce this footprint, and how much removing unnecessary flights can save? So overall, how much i am saving doing one of those, instead of both?

    Also, eating is an everyday activity, flying usually isn’t (in the example you reported)

    I have no answers, i just didn’t like the argument

    • Fair enough,

      The point I’m trying to make is there are many ways to live more ethically, If you’re a vegan but fly a private jet, you don’t give a fuck about the environment, you’re just pretending you do.

      You could also not be a vegan and care more about the environment than a lot of vegans.

      I knew a militant vegan who removed the emissions filter from his diesel car, and tuned it to ‘roll coal’ (emit tons of smoke) because he thought it was cool.

      There’s a lot of nuance