• edel ( edel@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    As I mentioned more in detail in other post, Proton is not the pro-MAGA many had misinterpreted. It is just sloppy at the marketing campaign and its leader makes statements that can easily misunderstood too.

    That said, Proton has decided to aim for the masses, which has proven to be a winning business formula here. However, in that quest, it’s natural that concerns from top-tier privacy users (Linux users, those wanting non-Google push notifications, too-many-eggs-in-a-basket, etc.) get relegated in favor of the bulk of their primary target customers, the regular Joe who simply wants to move away from email and web traffic scraping. We should all applaud that decision, but we also recognize the limitations and big risks of having a single company holding some 80% of this privacy market, both for us and even for Proton. It would be better to foster a healthy, diverse, and more equitable privacy ecosystem.

        • Alaknár ( Alaknar@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe because it’s a bit like if someone said “I got the test results, I don’t have cancer”, and that dude replied with “the fact that you think cancer is the only danger you should be concerned about is telling”.

          Sure, it’s technically correct, but it’s obnoxious and, without any further context, just seems to be off-topic.

          • Cethin ( Cethin@lemmy.zip ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I love that the comment explaining it already existed when you wrote this. No, it couldn’t be that you were out of line! It had to just be the liberals!

            As a leftist, maybe shut the fuck up sometimes. Maybe you aren’t always the smartest person in the room, and complaining about stuff that isn’t even relevant is, at best, annoying, if not actively harmful because people will ignore it when it is relevant.

  • Tieas ( Tieas@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 months ago

    They screwed up, admitted it, apologized, don’t see why people are calling for blood anymore. People are allowed to make mistakes, they owned it and they cut ties with the guy.

    • While I agree that the response is heavily AI generated, I have to disagree that he’s pro-Maga. He reached out to both democrats and republicans to talk about the importance of privacy and the democrats turned him down (or entirely ignored him) while the republicans met with him.

      He then went on Xitter to shame the Dems and said that the Republicans seemed to be the party caring about privacy.

      He’s definitely a dumbass for trying to play it that way, but he did not come out in support of Maga.

    • He was not pro maga just because he could gain an audience with GOP members but not dems on a lobbying trip. There has never been a single shred of evidence showing he is pro maga, and at this point I’m just going to assume it’s a smear campaign against a Google competitor.

      Change my mind. I dare anyone to show the proof.

      • BigJohnnyHines ( BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        How does that make sense? Google is also maga. Hell, YouTube is one of the biggest rabbit holes for extremism in general. They could tune their algorithms for anything they wanted - it’s pretty clear.

        For Proton we’ll it’s easy to say there is no evidence after dismissing all of it. How maga of you.

  • fredposner ( fredposner@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    I loved proton years ago… even did a paid account for a while. This isn’t their first wtf moment and won’t be their last. The problem for me, its that I expect more carefulness and thoughtfulness from a company that promotes encryption and privacy.

    Showing me how easily you make mistakes is a quick way for me to question how well you’re safeguarding the platform.

    I’ve moved away. Will take some time for them to earn back the trust, but honestly… I don’t see a huge need for them anymore. I simply don’t consider email secure. If you want real secure communication (that you can host on a server yourself) Matrix and XMPP are a much better choice.

    Anyway… the response is nice. Just doesn’t fix anything.

  • 0_o7 ( 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    They seem to know that the market for privacy is more than people who want just want their private data safe. There are also people that use these services for controversial and or illegal shit. So they use these chuds and reach those spaces.

    It’s the swiss business model. A lot of controversial and corrupted people, politicians hide their money in privacy oriented banks offshore. They make profits no matter where the money comes from.

    A little bad press after the stuff is out doesn’t really matter all that much if that drives more profits. The backlash might even get them more exposure.

    They apologize and say they’ll never do it again and everyone moves on.

  • rose56 ( roserose56@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s why I’m leaving proton and it’s community. Lots of drama and political shit that I don’t want to know, not to mention the whole thing where proton from just an email provider, now sells VPN and other services l.