Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
TotallynotJessica ( TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) M to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months ago

no rule infuriates me more

lemmy.blahaj.zone

message-square
87
link
fedilink
755

no rule infuriates me more

lemmy.blahaj.zone

TotallynotJessica ( TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) M to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months ago
message-square
87
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Old Sage Rick ( OldSageRick@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    4 months ago

    I still remember how a colleague told me we should do X.

    I was bamboozeled and baffled by it because X was literally what it said on the flask of the chemical what you shoulf not do under any circumstances.

    His explanation as to why we should was, quote “I mean I know its strange, but Copilot told me it is okay and would be fine”

    • TotallynotJessica ( TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 months ago

      The world has gone mad

      • Phantaloons ( Phantaloons@piefed.zip ) Banned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I get a chill reading any historical nonfiction from the 1990s that is in any way optimistic.

        “look how far we’ve come, into the new millenium!”

        ehhhh… oh boy.

    • BurgerBaron ( BurgerBaron@quokk.au ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      If we thought outsourcing thinking to religions was bad, hoo boy. This shit is next level.

    • dustycups ( prex@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      When the boss pulls this on you and you ask for it in writing only to tell them: "I’m still not going to do it but now I have a written instruction from you to do something suicidally reckless”

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor ( AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    4 months ago

    If I wanted to know what a chatbot says, I would have asked it myself.

    • TotallynotJessica ( TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

    • Cypressed ( cyclonedusk@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hmm, you do make a fair point. Chatbots, indeed, are absolutely not velociraptors.

      … So FAR.

      • toynbee ( toynbee@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        One of my coworkers who’s into AI has a chatbot set to behave as they were an elder got, talk about code as incantations, etc.

        I wonder if, had he requested it be a velociraptor, he would have gotten mostly aggressive reptilian noises as a response.

        • Cypressed ( cyclonedusk@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          i might have been convinced that chatbots could’ve had some utility as sort of advanced ‘rubber duck debugging’, but in my humble opinion talking to an actual rubber ducky is a superior process because literal rubber duckies are not known for telling us to kill ourselves unless we’ve taken a truly apocalyptic quantity of hallucinogens.

  • Hexarei ( Hexarei@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 months ago

    Don’t ask chatgpt, I can tell you bullshit too and I’m beautiful

    • Septimaeus ( Septimaeus@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      Dig this energy. Shine on.

    • Catoblepas ( Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      A pic of a long haired calico cat with colorful overlaid text that says “stop using ChatGPT, I can also give you misinformation and I’m beautiful”

  • applebusch (she/her) ( applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 months ago

    what about “chatgpt says copy paste of LLM output”?

    might as well be a fucking bot

    • Klear ( Klear@piefed.world ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      I got a worse one. copy paste of LLM output without any mention of the source…

    • M137 ( M137@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      People seem to love being bots, half of the human internet is literally just people repeating the same shitty stuff over and over millions of times. Like half of the comments on any youtube video being “babe, wake up”, “legendary refresh pull” etc.
      And people only watching, listening to, playing, eating, wearing etc. the current popular things just because they are popular, they need to be the same as everyone else and think that people who doesn’t do that are weird and bad. It’s truly disturbing IMO.

  • uncommoncorvid ( uncommoncorvid@piefed.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 months ago

    • TotallynotJessica ( TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The most infuriating part is that they think this will actually convince you

  • Hildegard (she/her) ( hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can barely use the internet anymore. I have to filter by date to get results from before 2024. Otherwise all the results are obvious AI trash.

    When I tried to look up information about storing film negatives. Pretty obscure niche topic these days. The top pre-2024 result was from a well respected national archive, good informative page written by experts in the field.

    By contrast, the current day results were an endless sea of random websites who all by sheer coincidence decided to start writing about film archival in the year 2025.

  • maria ~ ( Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    by now, saying “i did a search” and actually having done a search and found stuff AND shared the link feels like a “good skill to have” again.

    my brother (14 y/ooooo sooooooo skibidi) uses mister gpt for all web searching which sucks big time. whenever he does use a real life search engine, hes surprised by the amount of stuff he finds by now.

    EDIT: fixed some typos…

    • Rooster326 ( Rooster326@programming.dev ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      It would be a “good skill to have” if they haven’t actively been making search engines worse, so they can make AI look better.

      How the fuck could AskJeeves from 20 years ago work better than search engines of today?

      • maria ~ ( Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        i believe search engines have been degrading prior to the LMs but might be misremembering…

        • Rooster326 ( Rooster326@programming.dev ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I tried looking up the decline but…

  • Aceticon ( Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    That sentence is a self-issued Certificate Of Stupidity.

  • unexposedhazard ( unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wish i could tell these people my honest thoughts about their idiocy but that would cause… issues…

    • rumba ( rumba@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      it’s ok, they won’t lash out at you on it, not at least until they ask chatGPT if they should be mad

  • froufox ( froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    “i asked chatgpt to calculate…”

  • Grail ( Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    I asked chatGPT to fuck off

    • TotallynotJessica ( TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

  • lost_faith ( lost_faith@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    Off topic: If said in french “ChatGPT” translates back to “Cat, I farted” - you’re welcome

  • YiddishMcSquidish ( YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    I had an Uber passenger that straight up said,“well I asked grok about restaurants around here…”

    Like no infuriation, as much as pity.

  • infinitesunrise ( infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve started encountering the occasional “I had ChatGPT summarize the issue for us” (Almost invariably three pages of nothing that could remotely be considered a summary) at work, and my reflex has been to nope the fuck out and move on to a different ticket. No faster way to move yourself to the bottom of my queue. Have fun getting ChatGPT to fix it. I want to work with humans, not their weird little emotional support sock puppets.

    • TotallynotJessica ( TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      A sock puppet would be more helpful because at least talking with one will help you reason through your problems.

  • skisnow ( skisnow@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m increasingly seeing this used as a disclaimer, as in, “don’t trust what I’m about to say; I went with the source that’s 90% useless because when I Googled it the search results were 100% useless”.

196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very “off topic”.

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren’t unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don’t rush mod actions. If a case doesn’t need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.08K users / day
  • 3.09K users / week
  • 4.82K users / month
  • 8.79K users / 6 months
  • 93 local subscribers
  • 6.95K subscribers
  • 8.79K Posts
  • 67.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • SoleInvictus ( SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  • Jorunn (she/her) ( will_steal_your_username@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  • 🏳️‍⚧️MiaCD🏳️‍⚧️ ( TheCoolerMia@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  • Jo Miran ( JoMiran@lemmy.ml ) 
  • TotallynotJessica ( TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  • erotador ( erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  • Arkhive (they/she) ( Arkhive@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  • Bad Jojo ( BadJojo@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  • rockSlayer ( rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  • Jorunn (she/her) ( WillStealYourUsername@piefed.blahaj.zone ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code