not_IO ( not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 months agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up1449
arrow-up1449imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO ( not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square45linkfedilink
minus-squareDagwoodIII ( DagwoodIII@piefed.social ) Banned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoYes, because 14 year olds are so responsible otherwise. A drunk 14 year old on a bike is probably in more danger than a drunk 21 year old in a car. And don’t get me started on what trouble a drunk 14 year old girl can get into.
minus-squareHerbGrower ( HerbGrower@slrpnk.net ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 months agoA drunk 21 year old in a car could wipe out a family. A drunk 14 year old on a bike is probably at worst only going to kill themselves.
minus-squareDagwoodIII ( DagwoodIII@piefed.social ) Banned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI wrote twice that the drunk kid was going to hurt themselves. How you got that I approve adults driving drunk is a mystery to me, one I prefer not to waste time solving.
Yes, because 14 year olds are so responsible otherwise.
A drunk 14 year old on a bike is probably in more danger than a drunk 21 year old in a car.
And don’t get me started on what trouble a drunk 14 year old girl can get into.
A drunk 21 year old in a car could wipe out a family. A drunk 14 year old on a bike is probably at worst only going to kill themselves.
I wrote twice that the drunk kid was going to hurt themselves.
How you got that I approve adults driving drunk is a mystery to me, one I prefer not to waste time solving.