This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy.

    • Oh_Sheila ( iloveyou@lemmy.zip ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’m 100% not convinced that it will stay this way. This, to me, is a push towards ID verification. Age verification is a first step. To me, it feels more like a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user

      • MalReynolds ( MalReynolds@slrpnk.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user

        I’m inclined to believe that infrastructure already exists (both state intelligence services and corpos like Meta), this is about being able to use it in the legal system and getting people to self censor.

        • 4am ( 4am@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          For normal activities this absolutely exists, and when you are just being you on the internet, a nation state could easily track you down.

          However, it’s exploitable and avoidable. Probably not entirely, but if you want to you can make their life difficult.

          They won’t stop until your digital identification cryptographically signs every packet you send, I guarantee it.

    • qyron ( qyron@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      My country provides ID from birth.

      Biometrics are only collected around 5 years old, and only for the indicators, while signature only is requested around 7, after pre-school or first year of literacy.

      Photo is taken with days or weeks. The state, all of us, recognize everyone as a citizens and their rights from birth.