the existence of a sexuality cross product implies the existence of negative gender, which implies the existence of negative gayness. a [1 0 0] * [-1 0 0] relationship would be gayness -1, while being straightness 0, suggesting some kind of anti-gay or opposite gay. rather than attempting to erase the existence of negative gender with an absolute on the cross product we must explore its implications. perhaps a negative gender individual can be found. gender theory must know!
[1, 0, 0] and [-1, 0, 0] must never meet unless they annihilate each other in a violent particle-antiparticle explosion!
but functionally, they are indistinguishable, since the effective gender is actually the complex gender absolute value squared! yes that’s right, [i, 0, 0] exists as well.
Cis for agender nb [reversible] specifically
Inside the Gaytrix
Something worth noting here for people confused, is that this isn’t for computing or representing gay identity, its for computing gay expression of a couple. Each vector is one person describing their gender expression, and the output of the math is “how gay of a couple are they”.
All in good fun, I assume, but just wanted to clarify that this doesn’t calculate how gay a person is in isolation. Which is why they don’t have to worry about Bi/Pan, because it’s not about identity, it’s about optics, I guess.
What about transbian.
[1 0 0]
[0 1 1]
?
A man or woman is more straight for loving nonbinary as well, than just the opposite gender. You might even say they are super straight.
deleted by creator
![gender math [gay calculator]](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/79007dcf-f743-42ce-86c7-e03d3631a981.webp){kind=link}