the existence of a sexuality cross product implies the existence of negative gender, which implies the existence of negative gayness. a [1 0 0] * [-1 0 0] relationship would be gayness -1, while being straightness 0, suggesting some kind of anti-gay or opposite gay. rather than attempting to erase the existence of negative gender with an absolute on the cross product we must explore its implications. perhaps a negative gender individual can be found. gender theory must know!
[1, 0, 0] and [-1, 0, 0] must never meet unless they annihilate each other in a violent particle-antiparticle explosion!
but functionally, they are indistinguishable, since the effective gender is actually the complex gender absolute value squared! yes that’s right, [i, 0, 0] exists as well.
![gender math [gay calculator]](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/79007dcf-f743-42ce-86c7-e03d3631a981.webp){kind=link}
the existence of a sexuality cross product implies the existence of negative gender, which implies the existence of negative gayness. a [1 0 0] * [-1 0 0] relationship would be gayness -1, while being straightness 0, suggesting some kind of anti-gay or opposite gay. rather than attempting to erase the existence of negative gender with an absolute on the cross product we must explore its implications. perhaps a negative gender individual can be found. gender theory must know!
[1, 0, 0] and [-1, 0, 0] must never meet unless they annihilate each other in a violent particle-antiparticle explosion!
but functionally, they are indistinguishable, since the effective gender is actually the complex gender absolute value squared! yes that’s right, [i, 0, 0] exists as well.
Cis for agender nb [reversible] specifically