• Here’s what N. M. Klein wrote about the internet all the way back in 1998, likening it to a labyrinth.
    I don’t say this often, but this text has completely changed the course of my life.
    Some choice quotes:

    1998 is still a dangerously nascent stage in the Internet, while a trillion dollar nest of dragons sets up shop.
    Inside, you have seemingly infinite choice, but practically no way out. In fact, you prefer being trapped a bit. That gives the story some bite. Why enter Happy Imprisonment? Because you slowly catch your breath. You expect to outwit the program.
    Pockets of confusion in the system let the player imagine that there are ways to subvert it. It’s a Faustian sim-bargain. The player submits to the labyrinth, then pretends to cheat.
    Simulating revolt is more fun, and a better investment. […] But consider what sim-revolt implies as a broader model for public life? We pretend that the labyrinth of the Web makes us free of the global corporate program that builds and owns it. We feel above the swamp of idiotic web sites. We know how to surf. The demon apparatus can’t get us. We can dig out of anything. We’re never trapped.
    Recently, there is talk of voting on the Web. Is a cross between ergonomic fascism and the shopping mall the best frame of mind for making political decisions? Let us not mystify information delivery too much. Despite the services, it is not fundamentally democratic, only the freedom to chat. The server and the search engine are a feudal plantation. They decide for us, when to plant, when to hunt.
    The labyrinth is a mood of passivity. It’s like saying you’re never really trapped in bad traffic. Just because we can subvert the Web by saying nasty things or engaging in cyber-sex in the margins, or downloading information cheaply, does not mean that we are subverting any core reality.

  • Yeah and this is why my friends all have gibbity subscriptions: “its so much easier to find info instead of scrolling through reddit or a ton of google pages that are ads! I set my gibbity up to tell me the weather!”

    Jfc people are stupid and I hate everyone and I must scream.

    /rant.

  • This is canonically accurate as in the beginning, it was basically universities that had the connections from “the Internet”. Of course, the defense dept had it first and then probably couldn’t figure out and gave it to smarter people. The rest is history.

  • Tja ( Tja@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Wait, what? Now it’s easier than ever to find information on the internet, what difficulties do people have?

    Is this person the one who writes “pls help me” in YouTube comments and doesn’t ever explain their problem or come back?

    • theneverfox ( theneverfox@pawb.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 days ago

      I strongly beg to differ

      3 years ago, when I searched for something I found it. Even the esoteric little details buried in an old forum weren’t that hard to find

      Now? It’s fine if you want the most common information, but it’s impossible to find the little details

      And those little details are critical for developers. A single sentence can give you an answer that could easily take hours or days to figure out

      Programmers aren’t only switching to AI because it’s easier… The old way of doing things has been crippled

        • theneverfox ( theneverfox@pawb.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 days ago

          Cool, those would be common information. Easier to find than ever

          Hell, if you search it it’ll come up multiple times. Hell, the AI summary will include exactly the lines I’m looking for. Hell, I probably don’t even bother, most of the time I’ll just click through in my IDE and read the relevant bit of the source code myself.

          If the answer is in the man pages, the problem is so simple I won’t remember there was a problem

          I’m still going to need that single forum post where the author of a framework makes an offhand comment that tangentially hints at the cause of the bug I’m hitting my head against

          No amount of man pages are going to tell me I need to downgrade a library, or change a configuration value no one bothered to properly document

          • Tja ( Tja@programming.dev ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            That was never easy to find, Google was never good at finding tangential hints. And nowadays you can ask a (local, if you want) agent to analyze the whole library and tell you where the library is crashing. Or open a github issue with the framework to have the author, or the community give you the hint. Good luck doing that on sourceforge.

            • theneverfox ( theneverfox@pawb.social ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 days ago

              That was never easy to find, Google was never good at finding tangential hints.

              It absolutely used to be, it was a huge part of my workflow. You put in the framework/library and one or two related terms, and it would bring up pages of information. If you dug through that, maybe make the terms more general once or twice, you literally would find some random forum post that gives you exactly what you needed. Usually someone else who solved the problem, but occasionally it was just a little detail in something unrelated. Or sometimes there just really was nothing, now it’s all the time

              Hell, you used to be able to paste the error directly with the project name and get that specific error through the stack and line numbers. Now, it just sees an error message and abstractes it into “any error message”. After the first few results, it’ll be random stack errors now also from completely different projects

              And I have tried to use a local LLM to dig through results, the problem is the information no longer comes up. Between sites closing themselves off to prevent scraping and Google intentionally demolishing their search capabilities, that entire branch of development skill is just gone

              It was a stark change, just around 2 years ago I noticed it happening, and it’s only gotten worse

              At this point you really need an AI to read through the source if you don’t want to do it yourself

              I guess you could contact the developers, but it’s generally faster to figure it out yourself, so I never got into the habit

                • theneverfox ( theneverfox@pawb.social ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  Easier than the alternative multiple times over… and these were examples of how powerful it used to be. These were esoteric problems that couldn’t be worked around, either new libraries we were using to do something wired or legacy code we had to interface with

                  Like I mentioned, normally you could just Google the stack trace and find a discussion on your error immediately. AI is a decent replacement for that at least

    • bold_omi ( bold_omi@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      It is not easier to find information; real information exists still, but it has been drowned out by garbage. Consider Borges’s “The Library of Babel”, or watch the Fractal Philosophy video concerning “surviving a dead Internet”.

      There is also the issue of knowledge being paywalled. Consider the Guerilla Open Access Manifesto and its context.