Between 19:45 UTC and 19:50 UTC, there was a mistake in how information was stored temporarily (cached) on Beehaw. This mistake could have allowed some people to see and use other people’s accounts without permission.
If you were using the website during that time, please check that your account settings and email address are still correct. Also, make sure that any posts or actions you made during that time are still connected to your account.
It’s important to note that we don’t have any proof that this error was actually used by anyone to do anything bad during the short time it happened.
- Chris Remington ( @remington@beehaw.org ) English16•1 year ago
I can verify that @Penguincoder@beehaw.org is one of our volunteer sysadmins and this incident was witnessed by me.
- Helix ( @Helix@beehaw.org ) English8•1 year ago
same, same :p
- Chris Remington ( @remington@beehaw.org ) English9•1 year ago
I can, also, verify that @Helix@beehaw.org is another volunteer sysadmin here at Beehaw.
- argv_minus_one ( @argv_minus_one@beehaw.org ) English15•1 year ago
That’s one of the two hard problems of programming: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors.
- fishy 2.0 (he/him) ( @fishy_2_0@beehaw.org ) English8•1 year ago
thanks for alerting everyone to this aswell as reacring quickly
- Cougar ( @Cougar@beehaw.org ) English6•1 year ago
Do we know what could have caused this cache error?
Yes; configuration settings for the web server involving improving performance. Those settings have been changed back to the previous, non-issue ones. So this should not occur at this time, or again.
- Cougar ( @Cougar@beehaw.org ) English10•1 year ago
Is this a mistake that’s easy to do for an inexperienced instance admin or just a consequence of too much fiddling and shouldn’t be an issue for other instances?
Was a result of too much fiddling. Attempting to gain even better performance from a bottleneck issue due to recent user influx. It was not an error in the Lemmy instance or Lemmy-UI but rather the web server front-end misconfiguration.
- karce ( @karce@beehaw.org ) English6•1 year ago
Thanks for working through these issues and improving performance of the website! Very appreciated. I’ve been tempted recently to create my own Lemmy instance, was this a problem with an nginx configuration option? How much does Beehaw deviate from a standard Lemmy deployment?
Feel free to answer vaguely if you don’t feel comfortable with giving away the details : )
- Helix 🧬 ( @Helix@feddit.de ) English6•1 year ago
was this a problem with an nginx configuration option?
Basically, this was
proxy_cache_key
being configured incorrectly. If you don’t use theproxy_cache
you should be fine.The only thing we changed from the norm is
ulimit
s and some nginx settings. If we figure out what works well, we’ll probably create a post about how to host lemmy. If you stick to the defaults, you’ll be mostly fine if your instance isn’t as big as Beehaw’s.- karce ( @karce@beehaw.org ) English3•1 year ago
Awesome! Thanks for the response. I’d love a post sometime on hosting Lemmy. I’d find it very interesting and useful!
- nutomic ( @nutomic@lemmy.ml ) English2•1 year ago
Im also considering to setup nginx caching for lemmy.ml. Did you find a configuration which works?
- Helix 🧬 ( @Helix@feddit.de ) English4•1 year ago
Not yet. Session tracking in Lemmy is pretty hard to proxy, I’ll have to dive into the code to figure out why.
Yes.
Deviation is pretty minimal, related to configuration and customization.