Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 Nils   ( @nils@feddit.de )  to Technology · 2 years ago

Google's New Web Environment Integrity Proposal Dismissed by Brave, Mozilla, and Vivaldi

news.itsfoss.com

external-link
message-square
102
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • tech@kbin.social
980
external-link

Google's New Web Environment Integrity Proposal Dismissed by Brave, Mozilla, and Vivaldi

news.itsfoss.com

 Nils   ( @nils@feddit.de )  to Technology · 2 years ago
message-square
102
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • tech@kbin.social
When it is Google, you expect controversy. Let us find out what it is this time.
  •  shrugal   ( @shrugal@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 years ago

    Apple already added basically the same thing about a year ago: https://blog.cloudflare.com/eliminating-captchas-on-iphones-and-macs-using-new-standard/

    •  floofloof   ( @floofloof@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is this technically equivalent to Google’s proposal? Apple say that their version was developed in collaboration with Google, so it would be surprising for Google to go and deploy a second version of the same thing, were it not for the fact that Google always has two competing versions of everything.

      And I guess the main reason people are more concerned about Google’s version is that they are so dominant in the browser market.

      •  shrugal   ( @shrugal@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 years ago

        The details are a bit different. PATs use HTTP headers during a request while WEI is a JS browser API. But otherwise the general structure and end result are the same. A website requests an integrity check, an attester checks your device, and if the attester doesn’t like your device then you’re SOL.

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 214 users / day
  • 480 users / week
  • 2.7K users / month
  • 6.3K users / 6 months
  • 5.07K local subscribers
  • 41.1K subscribers
  • 5.52K Posts
  • 98.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  Chris Remington   ( @remington@beehaw.org ) 
  •  alyaza [they/she]   ( @alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  •  gyrfalcon   ( @gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  •  rs5th   ( @rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  •  coldredlight   ( @coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  •  Leigh   ( @SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code