Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Hellfire103 ( hellfire103@sopuli.xyz )  to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years ago

Google are so shit

0x0.st

external-link
message-square
31
link
fedilink
410
external-link

Google are so shit

0x0.st

Hellfire103 ( hellfire103@sopuli.xyz )  to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
31
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • A10@kerala.party ( A10@kerala.party ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 years ago

    How many chrome vs Firefox memes do you want Lemmy?

    • Hellfire103 ( hellfire103@sopuli.xyz ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      3 years ago

      MORE!!!

    • Gamey ( gamey@feddit.rocks ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 years ago

      We will meme Chrome to death!

    • manpacket ( manpacket@lemmyrs.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 years ago

      All of them.

    • Dataprolet ( dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) Banned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yes

  • macniel ( DmMacniel@feddit.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 years ago

    We can only hope. But then again, we saw how people act when it comes to those changes. They will try it for a bit but then fall right back and accept the shit they wanted to flee from.

    • Gamey ( gamey@feddit.rocks ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      On one hand I agree but on the other I feel like ads are a lot more trouble than a new browser to most users so that part might actually work for us. The really sad thing is that all browsers want to support all majore websites and once something like Youtube requires web DRM we basically lost because everyone will add it! :/

  • rambos ( rambos@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 years ago

    Anyone have any content blocker for chrome? I want to see adds only

    • starman ( starman@programming.dev ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Don’t worry, google will handle it for you

    • lhamil64 ( lhamil64@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Personally I’d like to only see multiplies, thanks.

  • lemillionsocks ( lemillionsocks@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 years ago

    I know that the jump to chrom was aided by a number of factors, with one of the bigger ones being how fluid technology use was at the time. Everything was new and anything could become number 1.

    Still it’s so frustrating that when firefox had the memory leak and “took a long time to launch” the web was flooded with complaints and people jumping to chrome and congratulating google on what a modern browser they built.

    Meanwhile everytime chrome gets caught with high memory usage, pushing their own web standards, or destroying adblock and a free web as we know it, the internet as a whole shrugs as if there isnt anything that can be done.

    • rckclmbr ( rckclmbr@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Remember Google AMP? And Google was proxying sites that implemented it? That shit would have been so abused if it had reached as critical mass as Chrome

  • Holzkohlen ( Holzkohlen@feddit.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    Death to Google. After that Microsoft is next on my list.

  • lobut ( lobut@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 years ago

    Not gonna lie, unlike just of you guys I don’t really care for ad blocking. I pay for YouTube premium and other sites I visit I don’t really get bothered by it.

    However I’m more disturbed about the overreach this is and the control we’re giving to Google or whoever. That’s the reason I use Firefox.

    • Stoneykins [any] ( Stoneykins@mander.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 years ago

      Its like a ransom if the stakes were as low as possible. They hold your state of non-annoyance hostage and ask for a negligible amount for it so no one gets emotionally involved in this exchange regardless of whether or not they wanna pay the ransom. Instead of subterfuge or the threat of violence they “get away with it” by nature of being generally inconsequential.

      All this to say, seeing as you payed the “ransom”, I would personally describe you as more bothered by ads than anyone else. Not a value judgement, just an observation.

      In order of least to most bothered by ads, doesn’t it make sense to assume

      1. People who watch ads (unbothered)

      2. People who install adblockers (somewhat bothered)

      3. People that pay money to remove ads (extremely bothered)

  • Rizoid ( Rizoid@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’ve tried firefox in the past. Back and forth I go when google does something dumb but I always go back. This time I think I’ll deal with the stuff I don’t like for now, or maybe make extensions to fill the voids that I miss desperately.

  • Mandy ( Mandy@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    We both know barely a single person this is referring to even knows what a browser is

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬 ( Dirk@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    I just tried Firefox: Startup took around 40 seconds, UI was not responsive at all, and I couldn’t install locally developed extensions.

    • macniel ( DmMacniel@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 years ago

      Snap version?

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬 ( Dirk@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Nope, right from the repos.

        • manpacket ( manpacket@lemmyrs.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          Ubuntu ships Firefox as a snap now so you have to get it from outside of the repo if you want it to be normal.

          • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬 ( Dirk@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            I’m on Arch.

            • manpacket ( manpacket@lemmyrs.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              There’s a few suggestions about debugging it in Fedora, you should be able to replicate most of them. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Firefox_problems

    • ReCursing ( ReCursing@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      And what about the second time you started it and it didn’t need to build a user profile first?

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬 ( Dirk@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        I thought the same, but no, takes that long, too.

        • BCsven ( BCsven@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Its less than 1 second on my wife’s 2011 laptop, something is wrong with your system

    • jinarched ( jinarched@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      40 seconds to boot? I’ve never experienced this even on my 20 years old potatoe. I find that very hard to believe.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬 ( Dirk@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yep. I don’t think it’s a performance issue. But I don’t get any logs either.

    • DarkenLM ( DarkenLM@artemis.camp ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I also experienced this, and immediately after a reinstall, Firefox decided that it didn’t like to be reinstalled and bricked my OS. I had to completely reinstall it because the boot section was nowhere to be found, and barely any data was salvageable.

      So, even if Chrome is bad, I prefer to use Ungoogled Chromium or other chromium forks that don’t nuke my computer than using a browser that has consistently given me extreme problems.

    • waka ( waka@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      40 seconds startup?! What? Should open within like 2-3 Seconds. 5 if your system RAM is maxing out.

      Abou locally developed extensions, you will need to follow the specific developer directions on that. But if you code, you should’ve figured that out already. If not, you tried doing shady things, which Firefox rightfully blocked.

  • Veraxus ( Veraxus@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    If you are a Mac user, Orion is also a great choice.

Memes@lemmy.ml

memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1.74K users / month
  • 5.47K users / 6 months
  • 1.36K local subscribers
  • 57.2K subscribers
  • 10.8K Posts
  • 84.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop ( gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml ) 
  • Cyclohexane ( cyclohexane@lemmy.ml ) 
  • Arthur Besse ( cypherpunks@lemmy.ml ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code