deleted by creator
My only gripe is that it locks you in.
Removed by mod
That second part. The ‘e’ in email stands for evidence.
Please tell me of a email service that is government proof. There is none that doesn’t and will never exist. Of course Proton is private and secure as the user is. All of this boils down to the user security hygiene.
They talk about for the number of requests has grown as the number of users has. Previously they advised users to use their onion address.
Additionally they said the emails and other stuff is encrypted so it’s really just some meta data that is being handed over.
Removed by mod
Then what do you suggest for an email client? My point is, you do the best you can and not make a big deal on couple thousand requests being handed over when there are 100m accounts.
Removed by mod
Yes as I said before its not like yes I will use Proton mail for nefarious stuff and expect that Proton will defend you against a government. The user is responsible for their data safety.
I completely agree. It’s hard for a lot if people to look at the big picture and realize that the data handed over was likely for some pretty serious illegal stuff.
Additional, most people just are trying to hide their data from advertisers.
Never forget every email that leaves Protonmail to other email providors are not anymore secure or encrypted as using gmail or others.
Second no one can certify that incoming emails and meta-data can’t be read and recorded to a ghost mailbox before getting encrypted. you have no control on what happens on their servers
privacy shouldn’t rely on trust
It’s really difficult if not impossible to be private with services you can’t trust… suppose you were to not trust Tor. How can you prove it to be private if you can’t trust anything they say or share? I think it’s almost impossible, isn’t it?
You’re going to have to put trust somewhere if you want to be private, whether it’s your device’s hardware, software, ISP or other…
I don’t think that Tor relies entirely on trust. it rather relies on the probability that there needs to be at least half of entry and exit nodes compromised for a attacker to be able to deanonymize users trying to access the clearnet. the hidden network is even harder to deanonymize as there are more than 6 hops in the path. and all nodes participating in the network are visible.
proton on the other hand can do what ever they please on their servers and can never get caught with it.
I don’t disagree with you. But if you start with the assumption that a service cannot be trusted, it’s really difficult, maybe even impossible that despite it, privacy is safe. That’s a different claim. Especially as this claim would have to hold across the whole end to end. I can’t see how one can imagine having any privacy in such a scenario.
In other news, water is wet.
Only private if you use gpg… But you still leak metadata
deleted by creator
