I was looking for something different from Tor and not like I2P. Someone give a look on Lokinet? What’s your thoughts?
Edit : I know that is based on oninon nodes I mean about the privacy feature and what have to offer more
- EngineerGaming ( @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl ) 9•1 year ago
I am concerned that the payment for starting a node would create an effect opposite of what’s advertised. Looked it up and the cost of setting up a node is more than all my savings. That absolutely deters an average Joe who just wants to contribute to the network. Who would want and be able to set up a node then? Either crypto enthusiasts or someone who has big funds already. Like big corporations and government agencies. Also if the operators of the nodes receive money, that means someone would have to lose money, right? Sounds a little bit like a pyramid. Maybe I am wrong, but the logic seems weird.
- ReversalHatchery ( @ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org ) 4•1 year ago
I’m not sure it’s a pyramid structure. To me what you have described is rather a service provider structure. In a pyramid those who pay don’t get anything in return, no?
- EngineerGaming ( @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl ) 3•1 year ago
I mean, I am confused where they would take the money if we assume everyone who paid to set up a node gets 100% of their money back.
- GonzoKnows ( @gonzoknowsdotcom1@monero.town ) 7•1 year ago
Just stick to signal, briar and matrix for now, this network still needs to stand the test of time
- ReversalHatchery ( @ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org ) 7•1 year ago
Those are messaging apps, totally different things. What OP tells about is overlay networks over the internet that hide your traffic.
- GonzoKnows ( @gonzoknowsdotcom1@monero.town ) English2•1 year ago
Briar is a network it uses tor as well
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English2•1 year ago
Tor is to lokinet just as briar is to session
- Devjavu ( @Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 3•1 year ago
Can also recommend signal and matrix
- auth ( @authed@lemmy.ml ) 6•1 year ago
Briar is probably the best of the 3 except that it uses too much battery
- Devjavu ( @Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 2•1 year ago
Not for privacy it isn’t
- jet ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) English3•1 year ago
can you explain how briar isn’t the best for privacy?
- Devjavu ( @Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 2•1 year ago
That is because I had Matrix and briar confused. Matrix is the one with no forward secrecy or whatever it was called. If someone gets your Matrix key, they have all your previous messages.
- auth ( @authed@lemmy.ml ) 2•1 year ago
Maybe edit your reply then
- Devjavu ( @Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 1•1 year ago
I think downvotes should be enough ;)
- ninchuka ( @ninchuka@lemmy.one ) 1•1 year ago
No they don’t, matrix has partial forward security, it does rotate the keys for messages, not for every message, but it does rotate them for all users in an encrypted room if a user has a new login so that session can’t read past messages until it gets keys shared by verifying with another session, same for when a user joins the room and maybe leaves the room
- Devjavu ( @Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 1•1 year ago
If you call it forward security I think you should ask yourself if the dude who swapped names is maybe more correct as he has the right jargon ;)
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English2•1 year ago
It seems promising but its not the only player in the game. Tor is the oldest and most reliable but there is also i2p and the new freenet
- AHEHE ( @Nerdic@unilem.org ) 2•1 year ago
It has some theoretical advantages over tor/i2p, but it’s still too early to really tell how well it matches up.