Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 Bri Guy   ( @brihuang95@sopuli.xyz )  to GamingEnglish · 2 years ago

The Elder Scrolls VI will skip PS5 and isn’t coming until at least 2026

www.theverge.com

external-link
message-square
84
link
fedilink
119
external-link

The Elder Scrolls VI will skip PS5 and isn’t coming until at least 2026

www.theverge.com

 Bri Guy   ( @brihuang95@sopuli.xyz )  to GamingEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
84
link
fedilink
Not exactly surprising.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  •  ghashul   ( @ghashul@feddit.dk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would be surprised if it released in 2026.

  •  Wahots   ( @Wahots@pawb.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    Shit, if they haven’t started it yet, it better not be coming out in 2026. I want at least four years of peaceful development without them rushing it and burning out the devs. I want good stories and plenty of werewolf content. And no gamebreaking bugs like Cyberpunk, whose campaign got glitched for me.

    •  barsoap   ( @barsoap@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 years ago

      And no gamebreaking bugs

      …with Bethesda? You’ll have to wait for the community patch.

    •  hyorvenn   ( @hyorvenn@jlai.lu ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      To be fair a game like elder scrolls might even need a whole decade of proper development to avoid gamebreaking bugs, Skyrim took 6 years and we got the civil war quest line…

    •  Jimbo   ( @Jimbo@yiffit.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      If there’s not plenty of werewolf content I’m sure modders will fix that. “Other” kind of content too I’m sure. :3

      •  Wahots   ( @Wahots@pawb.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        As much fun as werewolf penis is, I want real story development, haha. Questlines, explore the affliction, marginalized werewolf underground societies, maybe even a remote village where everyone, men/women/children are werewolves and/or other types of were creatures? I feel like there’s plenty to explore aside from the yiff and relationship type stuff!

        •  Jimbo   ( @Jimbo@yiffit.net ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Haha yes this is fair.

          maybe even a remote village where everyone, men/women/children are werewolves and/or other types of were creatures?

          It was some time ago but I’m pretty sure I did a quest in The Elder Scrolls Online that had something like this… Not sure where it was but it was a good side quest with its own hidden area

  •  Squirrel   ( @Squirrel@thelemmy.club ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Elder Scrolls is the best series I’ve stopped caring about.

  •  Leafeytea   ( @Leafeytea@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    •  CrateDane   ( @CrateDane@feddit.dk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Baldur’s Gate 3 comes to mind. It was announced in 2002 and launched in 2023. They even had to cut all the content about black hounds.

      •  TheRoarer   ( @TheRoarer@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        But bg3 black hounds wasn’t Larian. That was Blackisle and it got canceled. It wasn’t the same game or the same studio.

        •  Robmart   ( @Robmart@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes… that is the joke.

          •  TheRoarer   ( @TheRoarer@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            The comment makes complete sense now.

    •  Dee   ( @Dee@lemmings.world ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Star Citizen might take the cake, I say as an original Kickstarter backer of Star Citizen.

      •  terny   ( @terny@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        What’s the current state of that? Haven’t really kept up with SC news for years mow.

        •  ursakhiin   ( @ursakhiin@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Most resources have been diverted to the single player campaign for a while. (Squadron 42)

          They communicate what is being done for the persistent universe (Star Citizen) but it’s a slower trickle of features due to the resource allocation.

          Generally, they made some really great gameplay engagements over the years but features are being prioritized based on the S42 needs. They only update on S42 once a month, but the updates have been looking like they are nearing feature completion (community speculation, not announcement) just due to them moving more toward bug fix/QA type stuff in recent months.

          The next big information dump is scheduled for October at the convention that’s coming up.

          They’ve given up on giving dates because the community is very unforgiving if the dates are missed. And in software, dates are almost always missed.

          •  HidingCat   ( @HidingCat@kbin.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Especially when it’s being run by a terrible project manager like Chris Roberts. Dates will be missed.

            I’m surprised they’re putting more effort into Squadron 42, it’s the only part I was interested in. Wonder if it’ll actually be released.

            •  ursakhiin   ( @ursakhiin@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              They have a progress tracker on the website that shows the various components that are left to be worked on and which game is for. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/roadmap/progress-tracker/deliverables

              Always take the dates with a grain of salt because they usually only list about 1-2 quarters only. But until recently, most of the bars were in S42 rows. I’m hoping for big news around it in October.

              The other big indicator for their focus on it was last year when they relocated a bunch of senior leadership in the org to the UK with the stated reasoning of focus on S42 with the trans that were already working on it.

        •  BaroqueInMind   ( @BaroqueInMind@kbin.social ) Banned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Removed by mod

        •  Dee   ( @Dee@lemmings.world ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s still moving towards completion. At a snail’s pace but it’s moving. To their defense they’ve done some really cool tech with the game engine and stuff but idk if that justifies the timeline imo.

          My money is spent regardless though, so I’ll zoom around in my leather interior ship whenever it does release.

          •  Jimbo   ( @Jimbo@yiffit.net ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            So better than Elite: Dangerous then

            •  Dee   ( @Dee@lemmings.world ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Lol arguably, you can actually walk around the interior of your ship in SC. The FPS portions are pretty good. But last time I played (like two years ago) I fell through a staircase.

              I should give it another go soon.

            •  interolivary   ( @interolivary@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              That’s not a very high bar, though. ED is light-years wide and an inch deep

        •  theolodger   ( @theolodger@feddit.uk ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Same as usual…

    •  bermuda   ( @bermuda@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      The previous world record holder before BG&E2 was Duke Nukem Forever which took 14 years to develop and 9 years from the initial announcement in 2001 to the release in 2010.

      •  MJBrune   ( @MJBrune@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

  •  LoamImprovement   ( @LoamImprovement@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh goddamnit, another creation engine game?!

    •  phuntis   ( @phuntis@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      a wholly new engine would almost certainly break mods or atleast make them harder to make as janky as creation engine can be it’s the best engine for modding there is and bethesda games absolutely need modding and not just cause the glitches

      •  Squirrel   ( @Squirrel@thelemmy.club ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m out of breath from reading this.

        •  phuntis   ( @phuntis@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          then breathe

      •  Erk   ( @Erk@cdda.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        A new engine would just have to have a new mod API. Plenty of engines have mod APIs. Nothing’s really stopping them, but they really love driving creation engine onward for some reason.

        •  phuntis   ( @phuntis@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          bethesda is not making a whole new engine from scratch that just isn’t happening if they switched engine it’d probably just be to a licensed engine like unreal and that sucks for mod support the reality isn’t creation engine vs a from scratch in house engine that supports modding just as well but with less jank it’s creation engine vs unreal or something else maybe but not in house and there’s no other engine out there that currently exists that’s as good for modding

          •  fox_the_apprentice   ( @fox_the_apprentice@lemmynsfw.com ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Please consider using punctuation!

    •  falsem   ( @falsem@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      We used to blame the Bethesda jank on their last engine, Game ryo. Safe to say that it’s not the engine at this point.

      •  ag_roberston_author   ( @ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        2 years ago

        Creation Engine is based on Gamebryo.

        •  AnonTwo   ( @AnonTwo@kbin.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Then making a new engine won’t fix the problem, because it’ll just be based off creation engine.

          •  🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆   ( @Kolanaki@yiffit.net ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            They don’t need to make one; they can use one of the many engines that already exist and can do everything their games try to do, but with far less jank. Unless they somehow manage to insert it in regardless, which I would not put past them.

            •  millie   ( @millie@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              ·
              2 years ago

              Why would a company with multiple blockbuster franchises completely scrap the engine they’re made in?

              •  WeLoveCastingSpellz   ( @WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.fmhy.net ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 years ago

                Because the engine is behind the standard set by decade out games

                •  millie   ( @millie@beehaw.org ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Weird that they keep hitting the ball out of the park.

            •  sickday   ( @sickday@kbin.social ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 years ago

              Or they can keep using the same engine with the same issues because gamers will definitely buy their next title en-masse despite the previously mentioned issues. Eg. Starfield

              •  KairuByte   ( @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 years ago

                To be fair, the engine has been overhauled since the original CE. So, while it’s not “new” it’s also not “the same engine.”

                •  barsoap   ( @barsoap@lemm.ee ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  They tend to do that by tacking on new jank without removing (much) of the old stuff, though, presumably because they have base assets and scripts that they’re constantly re-using. Or, differently put: As long as Papyrus will still be in the thing I seriously doubt they’re giving any thought to technical debt. Already in Skyrim people rather used the UI to script stuff (because that’s Flash and ActionScript is at least remotely sane and fast) but ultimately it’s SKSE (that is, native dlls) for anything that isn’t a lag fest.

                  It’s not so much that CreationEngine is easy to mod, it’s that it’s what a gigantic community of modders are used to and have developed tooling for (you can get by with little to no use of CreationKit which is an abomination all on its own). Stockholm Syndrome at its finest or we’d have seen much more content for RedEngine which is far technically superior (and yet CDPR is abandoning it for Unreal).

    •  MJBrune   ( @MJBrune@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  •  Nioxic   ( @Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    30 fps on a not very good looking game full of bugs

    Cant wait to pirate it

    •  MJBrune   ( @MJBrune@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      •  butter   ( @butter@midwest.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Disagree. It takes very little time to pirate something. Anything.

        Also, there are a lot of numbers between 0 and 60 that someone may be willing to pay to play a game. But for a modern game with DLC and stuff, more like 120.

        •  MJBrune   ( @MJBrune@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          deleted by creator

          •  interolivary   ( @interolivary@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s like the gamer equivalent of hatefucking. I don’t get it either.

            Like, if you know you’re not going to enjoy something why the hell force yourself to do it, if it’s just going to end up with you complaining about it on the internet?

          •  millie   ( @millie@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Why is everyone so worried about what other people play? Weirdly controlling.

            •  MJBrune   ( @MJBrune@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              deleted by creator

              •  millie   ( @millie@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Piracy is literally the only method by which a lot of media is preserved in the era of subscription services and abandoned properties. It’s a public service that ensures that some of the most significant art of the last century isn’t lost.

                The archives of pirates are a digital museum for a culture that can’t be bothered to preserve its own legacy.

                •  MJBrune   ( @MJBrune@beehaw.org ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  deleted by creator

          •  butter   ( @butter@midwest.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I should clarify, I haven’t pirated a game since prototype 1. At least a game that I could buy. I have pirated games I have emulated, but this is clearly a different thing.

            You can also use pirating to send a message. If a company does something really bad, like loot boxes or micro transactions, you can pirate take money they likely got from someone who’s addicted to gambling.

      •  noobdoomguy8658   ( @noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not about being worth playing - it’s about not being worth the money asked for, along with the scummy practices. Sometimes it’s a stance.

        And for some, it’s purely financial decision.

        •  MJBrune   ( @MJBrune@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          deleted by creator

          •  noobdoomguy8658   ( @noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            For some, $10 is not a sum they can spend on non-essentials. Some don’t want to wait for various legitimate reasons. Some want to be able to try the game out before making up their mind on whether they’ll pay for it. Some just don’t care about giving money to a massive corporation that’s definitely not suffering from the lack of money, for one reason or another: one of them, a very prominent one, is to avoid supporting the greedy corporate practices with your wallet, such as the lack of proper optimization and control over the graphical fidelity wrapped up in the “Oh, we just wanna preserve the look for everybody” bullshit.

            Lastly, if you really insist on defending paying against piracy, you should know that pirates either never pay in the first place, so it’s not like some poor big corp lost some sales, or they’re one of the most consistently paying customers for a given media, as has been the case for decades now.

            As for whether $10 is a lot… it’s really not up to you to decide when someone can or cannot afford to spend their money on. Not to mention that there’s no reason to defend a company that has more money than you can imagine, ripping off its employees only because of greed rather than lack of funds, yet they still decide to outsource basically the entire game to a gazillion of other studios, resulting in a game that’s kinda good, but very flawed with massive inconsistencies and “play it safe” decisions coupled with good-for-nothing premium editions and confirmed upcoming DLCs only to squeeze more money out of their consumers.

            •  MJBrune   ( @MJBrune@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              deleted by creator

              •  noobdoomguy8658   ( @noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                If the game’s worth it and I can easily obtain it legally at a sensible price, the pirating the game isn’t my first urge for sure… Again, if I pirate something I was never going to buy in the first place for one reason or the other, there’s no theft to speak of.

                Maybe I could transfer you several billion dollars right now, plus some change to cover up for the fees and taxes that may come up, but I just don’t - would you say I stole that money from you? You probably wouldn’t, because that was just a expectation and you never had the money in the first place, so there was no way for me to take it, and the fact that you expected to have more, didn’t get anything as a result, and did not actually lose anything does not constitute a theft.

  •  amio   ( @amio@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Judging by Starfield, they need all the time they can possibly get. It’s gonna be a long’un.

  •  WarmSoda   ( @WarmSoda@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Obviously

  •  Queen HawlSera   ( @HawlSera@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m pretty sure Elder Scrolls 6 never existed and was just made up to distract people from all the overreaction to Creation Club.

  •  ILikeBoobies   ( @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    That puts it at “at least” 15 years after the last entry in the series

    Hard to imagine it will have much of a fan base

    •  d3Xt3r   ( @d3Xt3r@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      But Bethesda could very well release a Skyrim Extra Special Edition in the interim, and fans will lap it up, no doubt. Jokes aside, there are many large fan-projects in the works which fans are looking forward to, such such as OpenMW, Skyblivion and Skywind, not to mention more “normal” mods for Skyrim itself, so I doubt the interest in the franchise is going away any time soon.

    •  millie   ( @millie@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      To be fair, Baldur’s Gate 1 and 2 came out in the 90s.

      •  ILikeBoobies   ( @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I would have attributed it’s success to the success of Divinity and DnD

  •  sadreality   ( @sadreality@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wait we are expecting new consoles by 2026?

    •  TowardsTheFuture   ( @TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Bad title. Will be console exclusive. Not saying it will be next gen.

      •  jonsnothere   ( @jonsnothere@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well, Xbox and PC exclusive.

        •  TowardsTheFuture   ( @TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah sorry meant that.

    •  giantofthenorth   ( @giantofthenorth@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Why wouldn’t we? The PS5 is already 3* years old, most cycles are around 7 years

    •  johnthedoe   ( @johnthedoe@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s what I was wondering. Do they know something? I would’ve assumed ps5 have enough tech to get to 2026

      •  navi   ( @navi@lemmy.tespia.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        Pretty sure this is referring to platform exclusives and not next-gen consoles.

  •  manapropos   ( @manapropos@lemmy.basedcount.com ) Banned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    ES7 won’t come until 2050

    •  massive_bereavement   ( @massive_bereavement@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      And be released anually until homo sapiens is no more.

      •  Zorque   ( @Zorque@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        So probably around 2052?

        •  interolivary   ( @interolivary@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ah, I see you’re an optimist

    •  BigBananaDealer   ( @BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      todd howard wont be leading es7. es6 and fo5 are his last

      •  MJBrune   ( @MJBrune@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

  •  AutoTL;DR   ( @autotldr@lemmings.world ) B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    A document released as part of the FTC v. Microsoft case confirms what was long expected: The Elder Scrolls VI isn’t going to launch for a few years, and it isn’t coming to PlayStation.

    And much like Bethesda’s most recent games — Starfield and Redfall — it’ll be available on both PC and Xbox when it does launch.

    In a statement about exclusivity attached to The Elder Scrolls VI section of the chart, which comes from an interview with Xbox head Phil Spencer in GQ, Spencer said, “In order to be on Xbox, I want us to be able to bring the full complete package of what we have.

    The Elder Scrolls VI was first revealed back in 2018, though we haven’t heard much about Bethesda’s next fantasy adventure since then.

    That would include Starfield, The Elder Scrolls VI, and the upcoming Indiana Jones game.

    This reveal is just part of a deluge of new details that came out of the case today, including Microsoft’s plan to stream PC cloud games, Activision Blizzard’s briefing on the next Nintendo Switch, and Microsoft’s reaction to the PS5 announcement.


    Saved 32% of original text.

  •  thejml   ( @thejml@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I could have sworn they mentioned targeting 2026 years ago when the teaser trailer dropped. I’m honestly surprised that it hasn’t been pushed back further with everything that happened with the studio in the years since.

    •  comicallycluttered   ( @comicallycluttered@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

  •  ampersandrew   ( @ampersandrew@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Company Losing Market Share to Competitor With Exclusive Games Bought Studios To Make Their Own Exclusive Games

Gaming

gaming

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !gaming@beehaw.org

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it’s gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming’s sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 59 users / day
  • 628 users / week
  • 1.43K users / month
  • 4.26K users / 6 months
  • 4.32K local subscribers
  • 33.3K subscribers
  • 4.17K Posts
  • 67.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  Chris Remington   ( @remington@beehaw.org ) 
  •  alyaza [they/she]   ( @alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  •  gyrfalcon   ( @gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  •  Whom   ( @Whom@beehaw.org ) 
  •  The_Hunted_One   ( @The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org ) 
  •  Chloyster [she/her]   ( @chloyster@beehaw.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code