Summary
The UK Parliament has passed the Online Safety Bill (OSB), claiming it will enhance online safety but actually leading to increased censorship and surveillance. The bill grants the government the authority to compel tech companies to scan all user data, including encrypted messages, to detect child abuse content, effectively creating a backdoor. This jeopardizes privacy and security for everyone. The bill also mandates the removal of content deemed inappropriate for children, potentially resulting in politicized censorship decisions. Age-verification systems may infringe on anonymity and free speech. The implications of how these powers will be used are a cause for concern, with the possibility that encrypted services may withdraw from the UK if their users’ security is compromised.
- simple ( @simple@lemm.ee ) English36•1 year ago
This would affect even messages and files that are end-to-end encrypted to protect user privacy.
But how would they even enforce that? It’s E2E, and I doubt anyone would add backdoors to every app, website, and service that uses it.
- Leraje ( @leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English59•1 year ago
They won’t need to. Signal, WhatsApp, Session and iMessage (Apple) have already said they’ll withdraw their products from the UK market. Meta are making similar noises regarding Facebook Messenger.
- Maeve ( @Maeve@kbin.social ) 5•1 year ago
Personally, I don’t trust or use anything Meta because I very well recall what Zuck said when fb was still university only.
- Extras ( @Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today ) 4•1 year ago
Bet they’ll try to come up with their own “private” messenger as an alternative too for the public
- Godort ( @Godort@lemm.ee ) 22•1 year ago
I suspect that the UK will just say “either you add the backdoor or you don’t operate here”
Which from a cynical perspective is just an easy check for hackers to see if a particular target is vulnerable by seeing if they’re allowed to operate in the UK
- ono ( @ono@lemmy.ca ) English22•1 year ago
They don’t need to backdoor end-to-end encryption when they can instead snoop at the endpoints (e.g. the apps).
Governments can force service providers to either do that or no longer operate in their jurisdiction.
This won’t stop especially knowledgeable people (including criminals) from using encrypted comms, but it will make it much harder to access for everyone else, thereby robbing the general population of an essential safety tool, among other things. It’s terrible for democracy and dangerous to vulnerable populations. The article is worth reading.
- Maeve ( @Maeve@kbin.social ) 2•1 year ago
They may or not, but would it be just UK downloads when it’s easier and cheaper to do it across the platform?
- Eggyhead ( @Eggyhead@artemis.camp ) 30•1 year ago
Well, I hope we get a list of businesses that comply so hopefully I can just uninstall those.
- AnonTwo ( @AnonTwo@kbin.social ) 28•1 year ago
Can only hope most products choose to leave the UK rather than go with this.
- Powerpoint ( @Powerpoint@lemmy.ca ) 22•1 year ago
The UK really is closed for business
- Echo Dot ( @echodot@feddit.uk ) 13•1 year ago
The conservatives are pretty bad at the best of times but the last 5 or 6 years they’ve been utterly appalling.
- makeasnek ( @makeasnek@lemmy.ml ) 9•1 year ago
How to contact your MP https://www.parliament.uk/get-involved/contact-an-mp-or-lord/contact-your-mp/
- LoafyLemon ( @LoafyLemon@kbin.social ) 7•1 year ago
Just fabulous! I absolutely can’t wait for Facebook and the gang to graciously remove their apps from the stores. It’s not like I rely on services like WhatsApp for daily communication or anything. But honestly, who wouldn’t want Rishi Sunak to have a front-row seat to all our messages? It’s like a dream come true, really.
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English4•1 year ago
This is why I hesitate to store my data in a foreign country. The US has lots of problems but at least I get a vote here
- MonkderZweite ( @MonkderZweite@feddit.ch ) 1•1 year ago
Now a Safe Harbour / Privacy Shield for UK, because they can’t provide a comparable level of privacy.