I just started playing COD Black Ops Cold War because I got it through my PlayStation Plus subscription and wanted to try it out. I’ve previously played some others like Modern Warfare (1 and 2) and WWII. While it always felt a bit over the top and propaganda-ish, I really liked it for the blockbuster feeling and just turning your mind off and enjoying the set pieces. However, Cold War has a section in Vietnam and I suddenly started feeling really uncomfortable and just turned the game off.
In WWII you can easily feel like the “defender”, and even Modern Warfare felt like fighting a very specific organisation that wanted to kill millions. Here however it just becomes so hard to explain why I’m happily mowing down hundreds of clearly Vietnamese locals that I was unable to turn my mind off and just enjoy the spectacle.
I turned to the internet and started browsing and found this article and I really agree with what the author is saying.
I don’t know if I will be continuing the campaign or not, but I just feel that I don’t want to support these kinds of minimizations of military interventions.
I just wish there were more high budget / setpiece games that don’t glorify real life wars. Spec Ops The Line was amazing in that sense, but it’s also quite old already.
I would love to hear your opinions on this subject.
- sobersquid ( @sobersquid@beehaw.org ) English80•1 year ago
Perhaps my memory is clouded, as it has been a long time since I had played a Call of Duty game, but I believe there was a time when most of it felt anti-war, in that you would die frequently and often, then be shown a quote that was about how there are no winners in war, providing a sharp contrast between the actions you were taking and the grin reality of what was occuring. After I believe Modern Warfare 2, the CEOs of Infinity War stepped down, and since then the quotes stopped being more anti-war, and much more pro-war, highlighting heroism and such in the quotes. I always viewed it as a studio change and just stopped playing after that, feeling the games were just missing the mark and farming more and more of that sweet multiplayer money.
- glockenspiel ( @glockenspiel@programming.dev ) 42•1 year ago
Citations Needed had a mini series where they discussed why this happened. The US government will give material support to movie and game studios in exchange for some creative control over the content. That’s why so many movies with military equipment in it are rabidly pro-war; the studios don’t get access to the real equipment without the government’s support, and they don’t sign off on extremely critical scripts.
COD and similar games don’t just pop out of a void and still strive for some semblance of realism. That is a huge selling point after all. So the government gets involved, even if in little ways. Same way China gets to censor movies, either by omission or fundamentally changing things, around the world.
- orca ( @orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts ) 26•1 year ago
This is the same reason TV shows like NCIS get 500 seasons.
- oddspinnaker ( @oddspinnaker@lemm.ee ) 10•1 year ago
Ooooh, I feel dumb that I didn’t pick up on this before.
I knew about movies (Top Gun and all) but not other things, for whatever reason.
- thoro ( @thoro@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
Yeah there was a little bit of that in the original WW2 games: CoD 1-3 and the expansion games and console exclusives.
- kingthrillgore ( @KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml ) 52•1 year ago
Activision receives preferential access and funding from the DOD. Much like with films and sports presentations, Call of Duty is a PR arm of the military industrial complex.
The upside is I don’t see how its improved recruitment numbers.
- Cethin ( @Cethin@lemmy.zip ) English11•1 year ago
At one point in time I certain it has. Right now people seem more skeptical, which is pretty fair since anyone joining now has lived their entire life during a pointless war.
- IWantToFuckSpez ( @IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social ) 46•1 year ago
It’s always been like that https://www.eurogamer.net/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-accused-of-rewriting-history-to-blame-russia-for-controversial-us-attacks
Also there is literally a former CIA exec in the exec suite of Activision.
https://www.activisionblizzard.com/leadership/brian-bulatao
And the Homeland Security Advisor to Dubya was also an exec at Activision
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Townsend
How many other game companies have executives with close ties to the military?
- Commiunism ( @Commiunism@lemmy.wtf ) 29•1 year ago
I think they were/are getting funding from some US military defense sector, the same one that was funding a lot of pro-american propaganda films. So even without taking the actual campaign/story of COD games into consideration, it’s definitely in their interest to make a propaganda game.
- Blackmist ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) English26•1 year ago
I mean, yeah. CoD has always glorified it. Even more so in recent years as they push for multiplayer and the massive payday that came with that. The earlier games often had a “war can be bad too” bits. The Russian bit in CoD1. The nuke. “No Russian”. But otherwise it’s a Michael Bay movie in game form.
Spec Ops The Line was the only game I can think of that bucked that. Even the publishers had no idea what it was, despite the antagonist literally being called Konrad.
- tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺 ( @tryptaminev@feddit.de ) 4•1 year ago
I found Red Orchestra to be more of an anti war game too. The way people die, you can die quickly w.o. knowing what hit you exactly, strong supression, having to respawn in another wave in the single player campaign constantly etc. really make you feel that real war sucks.
- sandriver ( @sandriver@beehaw.org ) 4•1 year ago
Old game, but Cannon Fodder was an anti-war satire, and also self-aware about the ridiculousness of making a fun game in the context of the horrors of war.
Yasumi Matsuno’s career was also built on quite rich and sophisticated crypto-Marxist critiques of superstructures and warfare, although he slid it under the radar via medieval fantasy. Tactics Ogre is probably the most famous Japanese game about genocide and class struggle. Probably the double whammy for why Western games criticism tried so hard to make it flop.
- SokathHisEyesOpen ( @Anticorp@lemmy.ml ) English3•1 year ago
The first CoD definitely showed the horrors of war. By the “Russian Bit” I suppose you mean the part where a Russian soldier tries to retreat and is shot by his commanding officer. Or maybe you mean where you have to wait for the soldier in front of you to die so you can pick up a gun and boots. But every CoD since that game has been more of a game and less of a history lesson.
- Blackmist ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) English4•1 year ago
Yeah, that bit.
Even though it was based on events from WW1, stolen under cinematic license for use in WW2 by Enemy at the Gates, and then subsequently stolen again by Infinity Ward.
But hey, it looks good.
- shoe ( @minishoemaze@beehaw.org ) 21•1 year ago
The most stark example against this is the original MW2 - in addition to the anti-war quotes everyone loves to talk about every time you die, the main antagonist is literally a US Army General (admittedly he is distanced from the actual Army by the end, using a PMC instead).
The black ops games have some twist that often provoke the the thought of whether the ends justify the means. ::: In Cold War, the main character, Bell, is actually a captured Russian soldier that they have brainwashed to fight for the US as part of an experimental program. When this is revealed, you have the option to betray your “team” and lead them into a Russian trap :::
That being said, I haven’t played all of the cod campaigns, especially some of the more “historical” entries. It’s more fun to play this type of game when it makes you feel like what you’re doing is justified. It’s important to remember it’s all fiction, but hey, it’s not going to be for everyone. If you feel like the game you’re playing goes against your morals, no shame in switching it off for something else.
As Reggie from Nintendo once said, “If it isn’t fun, why bother.”
- TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 12•1 year ago
As Reggie from Nintendo once said, “If it isn’t fun, why bother.”
I haven’t played enough to make a judgment about COD in particular, but like you said, this is from Nintendo, a company whose main franchise is a game for kids about a funny little man stomping evil turtles in a fantasy world. It doesn’t even have the trappings of something that you can take seriously and use to inform your real life. Nobody would mistake it for anything close to a realistic historical account, unlike COD.
Is Schindler’s List fun?
There is more to media and art than whether its fun. Art can be engaging and intriguing without being “fun”. I wouldn’t call Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice “fun” per se, but it’s definitely a good game.
- ShadowRam ( @ShadowRam@kbin.social ) 17•1 year ago
Would you define this as your “Are we the baddies?” moment?
Well, not really as I’m European and have no connection to any side in the Vietnam war.
I just feel that if your game is based on real life wars than you should be very careful to give a nuanced view of the situation. Even allowing a campaign on both sides would be interesting if executed well.
French colonization of Vietnam was what the VCP were fighting against at the beginning of the war. The Soviet Union and China got involved to help kick France and Britain out and US involvement came when it was clear France and Britain had lost the war. But other than that and the coalition troops I guess Europe wasn’t involved in the Vietnam War.
I knew about this. As a Belgian though, I don’t believe we had a lot of presence there.
Sadly, we have done our share of horrible stuff on foreign soil (but we haven’t made any videogames about it)
- Carlo ( @Carlo@lemmy.ca ) 2•1 year ago
(but we haven’t made any videogames about it)
I tried to find one, but it looks like you’re right. This is the closest I could find, and they seem to be based in Paris.
- kitonthenet ( @kitonthenet@kbin.social ) 17•1 year ago
Certainly we already had this conversation like ten years ago right? Call of duty has never been anything but that, you really can’t make a war game that is both fun and anything but pro war
- TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 13•1 year ago
I don’t think this is a conversation we can have once ten years ago and forget about it, as long as the franchise is still going.
- kitonthenet ( @kitonthenet@kbin.social ) 1•1 year ago
I think you’ve mistaken being pro war with being unpopular or being abolished or something
- TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 6•1 year ago
I don’t even know where you got that from. What I’m saying is that there is plenty of reason to keep talking about it.
- Gamey ( @Gamey@feddit.de ) 5•1 year ago
I never played much CoD so I might be wrong here but there is a difference betwesn debicting war and rewriting history in favor of the US and I think that’s what the author wants to point out, the US loves to be debicted as the good guys even if it’s anything but true and their collaborations with Hollywood show that really fucking well.
- Perfide ( @Perfide@reddthat.com ) 3•1 year ago
Yeah well, the propaganda has gotten even more blatant and it’s still the worlds best selling game every year. So I think it’s totally reasonable to continue having this conversation.
- Cyborganism ( @cyborganism@lemmy.ca ) 15•1 year ago
Yeah. I never played any other CoD games than the WWII ones. CoD 1, 2, the Pacific one (world at war?) and the latest WWII.
When I saw them release the modern warfare one after the invasion of Iraq, I thought it was so distasteful I never bothered to pay any other CoD game because I knew it would be uncomfortable.
- TheBlue22 ( @TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 14•1 year ago
Don’t they recieve funding from the us armed forces? No shit its pro army propaganda
- MinusPi ( @MinusPi@yiffit.net ) 8•1 year ago
Did anyone not realize this?
- TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 5•1 year ago
A lot of teenagers with poor history education probably never did.
- Eggyhead ( @Eggyhead@kbin.social ) 8•1 year ago
I installed all 100+ gb on my PS5, played 2 or 3 matches with a friend online, laughed a lot at how gruff-guy, teenage edge-lord it all was, then promptly deleted it in order to see if Destiny 2 was any better. (We’re still playing Destiny 2, but have all but given up on ever understanding what the hell we’re supposed to do in that game or how to even go about doing it.)
- Fizz ( @Fizz@mastodon.nz ) 7•1 year ago
@knokelmaat As someone who used to play call of duty I don’t think anyone plays the campaign and thinks its anything more than fantasy.
- prole ( @prole@beehaw.org ) English18•1 year ago
You forget that literal children play these games
- TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 9•1 year ago
And also US puts out enough propaganda about their role in wars that enough grown-ass adults have very idealized views about them.
- Silejonu ( @Silejonu@kbin.social ) 16•1 year ago
The US Army would disagree, and I’m certain they know better than you. They literally use CoD in their recruitment campaigns.
- Fizz ( @Fizz@mastodon.nz ) 1•1 year ago
@Silejonu @knokelmaat The article that you linked does not support your argument at all. It mentions that the US Army tried to make a video game to recruit people but its a game no one has heard of. Most of their budget is used to sponsor esports teams and streamers. That is not relevant to the propaganda in the CoD campaign.
- murtaza64 ( @murtaza64@programming.dev ) 14•1 year ago
Young and impressionable kids? I started playing the original MW2 when I was 11.
- Fizz ( @Fizz@lemmy.nz ) 5•1 year ago
Did you think it was real?
- WarmSoda ( @WarmSoda@lemm.ee ) 3•1 year ago
You thought it depicted reality?
Even if you know it’s fiction you get the feeling that you are on the “good” side, which may colour your perception on the US military interventions.
- WarmSoda ( @WarmSoda@lemm.ee ) 4•1 year ago
True. The teenage mutant ninja turtles colored my perception of giant crime fighting amphibious creatures when I was young…
Why are you giving an example that is not based on a real war or context?
Of course this doesn’t influence your opinion of real life as the subject doesn’t refer to real life (as you so clearly describe with the “giant crime fighting amphibious creatures”).
- WarmSoda ( @WarmSoda@lemm.ee ) 1•1 year ago
Because it’s the same thing.
Are you unable to distinguish fiction from reality? Do you also believe GI Joe was real? Does Grand Thieft Auto make you want to steal cars and beat up prostitutes?It’s a video game. You have much much bigger problems to worry about if you’re having trouble disconnecting from it in your mind.
Are you saying that fiction has no influence on how we view the world?
I’m sorry, but that is just wrong. Using fictional works as propaganda is a thing, so it most certainly has an effect on the public.
Other research papers after a quick search, these indicate influence between fiction and beliefs/opinions of the consumers:
- prole ( @prole@beehaw.org ) English16•1 year ago
What a brain rot take. They are children, my guy. I know you think you’re the smartest 12 year old in you class, but not everyone is as clever as you .
Or maybe this is just you telling everyone that you know don’t know how propaganda works.
- irmoz ( @irmoz@reddthat.com ) 8•1 year ago
You can’t act like media doesn’t help inform your biases. Sure, your opinion on nonexistent crime fighting turtles may not have changed, since that is complete fantasy. But your view on crime itself?
I saw Batman as a kid, and, though Batman obviously isn’t real, crime certainly is, and so are urban decay and bad neighbourhoods in cities. Seeing Batman take out goons and thugs made be believe those goons and thugs existed, and that I’d be in danger if I went out at night. More scared, in fact, because I knew Batman wouldn’t save me, since he isn’t real. The Batman films made Batman feel necessary, and his absence made the world scarier.
- kitonthenet ( @kitonthenet@kbin.social ) 10•1 year ago
That’s not incompatible with the thesis, fantasy can and does have a point of view
- irmoz ( @irmoz@reddthat.com ) 2•1 year ago
Exactly. For an extreme example, to “fantasise” about CSA requires a very warped POV.
- saigot ( @saigot@lemmy.ca ) 1•1 year ago
I know people who thought the infamous “no russian” mission was based on a real thing.
- teawrecks ( @teawrecks@sopuli.xyz ) 6•1 year ago
I think at this point, the only way they get media attention is if they do something outlandish like this. The adults get huffy and make posts like this, the kids don’t care at all and call them boomers, and all press is good for them. It started with “remember, no russian” and it’s the only reason I ever hear about COD anymore.