eatham 🇦🇺 ( eatham@aussie.zone ) to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agocreator trollyaussie.zoneimagemessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1695cross-posted to: exchristian@lemmy.one
arrow-up1695imagecreator trollyaussie.zoneeatham 🇦🇺 ( eatham@aussie.zone ) to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square23linkfedilinkcross-posted to: exchristian@lemmy.one
minus-squareThat Dutch guy ( TvanBuuren@feddit.nl ) linkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 years agoBut what if following the rules got the pet or child hurt, and not following them would not hurt them. Because that is the case here. I completely understand the analogy, but the result bestowed upon the child/pet is what determines the subject : good/evil. Though I read a very good comment here that said both options could and should be replaced by “responsible”, which actually makes a lot is sense.
But what if following the rules got the pet or child hurt, and not following them would not hurt them. Because that is the case here.
I completely understand the analogy, but the result bestowed upon the child/pet is what determines the subject : good/evil.
Though I read a very good comment here that said both options could and should be replaced by “responsible”, which actually makes a lot is sense.