Many of us have seen it happening in the last 4-5 years. reddit subs, and reddit in general has become a bit s***. Of course there are still good subs, especially the truly niche ones can often have a small helpful crowd. But with 100s of thousands of users, some sub drown in hate and negativity.

I’ve been thinking about why. With the offical reddit app, reddit is as easy as facebook, many people even refer the the platform as an “app”. Perhaps this ease of use attracts the wrong kind of people. This place is currently very far removed from this. You applied to get in, you chose this instance on the fediverse among a selection of other instances.

Calling it a concern would overstating things, but I think maybe we shouldn’t strive to become as ubiquitous as reddit has become. A couple of 100K users on this instance and maybe a couple of million spread across the fediverse is enough users. The ‘gate’ you have to go through to register actually makes this place so much better than reddit.

What are your thought?

  • i think that’s an intrinsic value of beehaw. if someone wants a more “reddit” experience, other prominent instances give that. beehaw curates a safe environment for discussion and by default i think that will make it a smaller community.

  •  NausetJF   ( @NausetJF@vlemmy.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I can see the logic in it, but it’s a tough pill to swallow for me. Sometimes not seeing much activity can feel pretty lonely. IDK, Im afraid a lot of my favorite topics will not transition to Lemmy cus of its complexity.

    •  Rannoch   ( @Rannoch@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I think it’s definitely a weird & difficult balance to try and hit - grow enough to sustain enough active, interesting communities for folks to want to stick around longterm, but not big enough to turn into whatever reddit/twitter/other sites have become. I’m not really sure how to do that, and my only main thought so far as a brand new user here is that it was surprisingly confusing, at least for someone like me with very little technical knowledge/etc. I definitely had to take a sort of “leap of faith” and power through the confusingness to get to this point where I have an account, an instance, am interacting, etc, but I am a little worried that other communities/people who would help create and build awesome communities on here will be confused or discouraged enough to not make it past understanding the site, instances/communities, finding communities they’re interested in, etc.

      Edit: rereading your comment, I especially felt the “seeing little activity” thing. I’ve been poking around trying to find communities to subscribe to, to build a page for myself that offers enough of the things I’m interested in, but have been finding most communities empty, mostly empty, or nonexistent, which is unfortunate. I know that logically I can create my own communities if I want, but I don’t really know how to do that and start from scratch, so I unfortunately then just end up not being a part of communities I’d be interested in being a part of, and I imagine many others hit the same wall.

      •  NausetJF   ( @NausetJF@vlemmy.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        Yeah. There are some communities that I can see having a hard time swallowing the initial entry into this place. Kerbal Space Program, Hyun’s Dojo and other more niche communities are the first that come to mind for me

  • Not buying it. The main subreddits got crappy when they got flooded with people, but part of having a million billion users is that some of them go off and make the niche subs that are great. A lot of quality is a function of quantity. If I can dodge mud-slinging titans ala r/movies and r/videos with a single “block magazine” click, but get 40 active niche magazines, 3 of which I care about, in exchange for it, that makes the site better.

    • Agreed. I love small communities, but i love small communities about topics i actuallly care about. And so far the only magazines i’ve found on Kbin/Lemmy that have any activity in them are about super generic stuff.

      I don’t want r/movies, r/anime or r/games, i want r/moviesfromthatoneobscuredirectorilike, r/thatonenicheanimenobodyelsewatches and r/thatoldassgameonlymeand10otherpeopleplay

      •  Phantome   ( @Phantome@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’m totally with you on the very niche topics. I understand the need to stay somewhat generic while the userbase grows, but I’d love to see more specific communities flourish too. I can’t imagine it would be possible to start an in-depth discussion on a game like Lisa the Painful RPG on here. Those places were my favorites on reddit.

    •  Rannoch   ( @Rannoch@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yes! This is what I think I was attempting to get across in another comment, but you said it better. In my opinion, it’s difficult or impossible to create a number of niche, high-value communities if the overall number of people is kept quite low. You end up with only general topics forums like you mentioned. Based on what I’ve heard so far, I think my opinion is - in order to get those niche communities (that I’m certainly hoping I’m able to find on here someday, as those are the ones that I spent the most time on and was most heavily invested in), those larger, more general communities also have to exist and have to exist with a large enough userbase to allow the branching off to occur successfully. I think limiting to a small number of total people kind of stifles the cool things a larger number of (good faith) people could create together. But, I’m very new here, so I’m interested to read others’ thoughts!

      Edit: I seem to always remember one thing I forgot to say right after posting. I agree with most commenters here who say they prefer a small community - I just think that in order to get that for particular topics you’re most interested in, it likely takes a large number of overall people, versus keeping it a small number of people with only general topics available, if that makes sense?

  •  Autumn   ( @Autumnal@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1611 months ago

    I definitely prefer a smaller community over a large one. I actually feel more inclined to interact with others in a small community like this. It feels less intimidating.

  • I’m actually more turned off by the (growing, it seems) protective attitude towards platforms like bluesky/Mastadon/Lemmy/beehaw :/ I don’t think making or keeping things less accessible is overall a great mindset for progress — isolationism always does just that, isolates

  •  Jeff   ( @jeff@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1511 months ago

    I’m just glad there isn’t the dang karma thing. That was a downfall to many folks and posts and not so great content. Also larger instances right now are shuddering from the Reddit hug.

  •  Spudger   ( @Spudger@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    As someone that never had a Reddit account* but still read about 18 subs on a daily basis (via Teddit) I was a bit sceptical about the value of signing up for Lemmy. So far, so excellent. It reminds me of the newsgroups I used to frequent 25 years ago. Big enough to be useful, small enough to be comfortable.

    *I never had a Facebook or MySpace account either. I used Twitter for a year about a decade ago but it all seemed a bit “look at me” for my taste.

    •  can   ( @can@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      Agreed. This is reminiscent of an earlier time on the web. Everyone complaining about potentially needing a second lemmy account doesn’t know what it was like to have an acount at several bb forums.

  •  chris.   ( @nihilx7E3@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1211 months ago

    100% agree. in my experience in various internet communities (both centralized & federated) over the years, small-medium sized communities have a lot more fruitful, intelligent, high quality content & discussion than larger ones, & once a community starts to go above the size of medium, a large part of the content takes a nosedive no matter how much the community tries to preserve the same vibe. the problem is simply scale - while it’s definitely possible to have a well-run large community, it’s a lot harder, & requires a lot more people & logistics than many internet moderation teams even have. thus, enshittification ensues.

    hell, even large companies like facebook & twitter have basically given up on moderation recently, & while part of that is no doubt due to apathy on the parts of leadership, i’d bet my dinner that the other large part is just simply a result of just how hard it is to moderate sites that big. at some point even growing the team & hiring/volunteering more moderators doesn’t even help, because now you have to deal with the issues that come with coordinating across such a large team (setting consistent rules/lines, ensuring everyone is moderating to code, power mods, etc). once you get to the point where your commmunity & team are that large, moderating just becomes a mess & a chore for everyone.

    imo small communities are where the fediverse shines, & where a lot of people are just missing the point by trying to grow as big as possible. trying to grow an instance to be as large as possible… just doesn’t make much sense on the fediverse. the issue with small communities on centralized platforms has always been simple numbers - when there’s not enough people in a community, it dies. you can’t talk with other communities or import the minds that feed them content, so the only choice is to grow the one you’re on. therefore, the only way to survive is to have more & more users on a single server.

    federation resolves this issue by letting small communities congregate & interact with each other. it essentially eliminates the above problem by letting all the small, scattered communities form into a large community on posts/threads/comments without having to take on the issues that comes with taking said community fully under their wings. i could make a single user instance right now, & still be a part of the overall community here & everywhere else. here we don’t have to follow the tenet of infinite growth to ensure our survival, & we can actually focus on cultivating our community instead. (defederation is imo just as crucial to this aspect as federation, but this comment is already getting too long so that’s another topic for another day)

    from what i’ve seen, the only reason why people want lemmy to grow as big as possible is either because they want lemmy to be reddit, or because they want to get “revenge” on the reddit app situation by seeing the company bleed users & die. but lemmy is not reddit in any sense but the ui & basic concept, most lemmy instances cannot hold all of reddit’s users, & despite some of our best efforts, reddit is not even close to dying. imo lemmy users focusing so much on reddit is just like when people focus on their ex after a breakup - it’s a lot healthier & more rewarding to just move on & focus on building something better.

  •  Veraticus   ( @Veraticus@lib.lgbt ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1211 months ago

    I agree with your points.

    That said I think one of the biggest draws of reddit (to me) was the constant influx of content. You could scroll and scroll and scroll and very rarely see repetitive content and there was always something new.

    While this behavior was addictive and probably bad for me, it is something I miss with Lemmy, which just has less content because it has less users. More users would probably solve this problem, but I get how it also destroys communities really easily, so… tradeoffs I guess.

  •  abhibeckert   ( @abhibeckert@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I disagree. There are millions of topics that you just can’t discuss on the fediverse, because you won’t find anyone interested in them.

    While having more people obviously makes some things more challenging, just because Reddit failed to deal with that doesn’t mean the fediverse will. As evidenced by recent decisions, Reddit is run by idiots. Over here on the fediverse, we can require instances be run by people who know what they’re doing - or be defederated. We’re already seeing that happen.

    Yes, there will be growing pains. I think it’s worth it.

    Also - you can have your cake and eat it too. An individual instance, maybe even one that decides to defederate itself entirely, can have a small number of users. Those instances will exist if that’s what you want.

    Also, I don’t think we really have a choice. This is a good community already. People will discover it and sign up. We can’t stop it (well, we can’t stop it on the full fediverse, maybe we can here on Beehaw).

  •  Pixel   ( @pixel@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1111 months ago

    Here’s the thing, for beehaw? yes. absolutely. But for lemmy? we don’t get to choose. That’s the cool part about federated social media though, is that as a corner of it grows, the whole concept grows. Which is really cool but also kind of an interesting problem for scalability

  •  esaru   ( @esaru@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 months ago

    The upvoting system rates a post in relation to other posts and does not depend on a large user base.

    The quality of posts depends on the type of users, and that can be better managed in medium-sized platforms like Beehaw and its application-style subscription.

    On those two aspects, the Fediverse is already better than Reddit for me, especially on Beehaw.

    Only in niche areas is a large user base still beneficial. However, I am confident that over time, niche communities will emerge on the Fediverse.