You say that like it wasn’t intentional demand manipulation on the part of Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. They have been colluding for years to manipulate the market between the three of them, so of course the system collapsed as soon as something they didn’t see coming happened (COVID, then the AI boom)
Hard disagree
I want to see something that works similar to (the way they claim) YouTube premium works.
Get a bunch of these journalism sites together and use a single sign on that catches what I actually view and pays out my single $5-10/month rate to the sites that I visit based on proportionality.
I realize that a privacy-focused community like this isn’t going to love the idea of some company tracking all the news/journalism sites they visit, but it really does seem (to me) like the best way to balance the fact that these journalists deserve to get paid and also the fact that I’m not going to give even $2/month to 20+ different sites, just because I refuse to keep track of all of those.
I mean I guess there’s always things like Patreon if those sites want to offer a like, $1-2 tier for full access, but they don’t because they think their stuff is worth more.
Man, I wonder if they could just all get together and let me pay one cost to get access to all of that.
It’s capitalism though, so it would probably have to be a different company that organized them all, right?
Then they’d need to like… negotiate prices and stuff, right?
I wonder if anyone will ever try it.
Collaborative list of basic IP blocks of known scraper hosts.
There’s no subscription, it uses servers because otherwise cheating is 100 times easier.
You cut out the crazy bit about community-created levels:
All community-created levels that were ever uploaded are now bundled with the game. You can access this massive library of content from the Custom menu (formerly Online).
Probably, but how would the federal government work with 11,600 Representatives in the House?
Or an exploit is found that can turn it on.
“We need to obfuscate all our actual goals to benefit ourselves, so let’s keep kicking a tiny minority.”
If you mean like, self-driving then I don’t know. Subaru has lane-assist and adaptive cruise control that uses only cameras though. They use two cameras for binocular vision though so it might not fall for this, I don’t know. Would be a good test.
As a YTM hater, here are my reasons:
If you played right at release, there was a bug that was causing that.
I explicitly remember it being a big annoyance of mine in my first playthrough, but it’s fixed now.
do you have the links to those actual tweets? I’d love to read what was posted, but these screenshots are too small.
A billionaire’s kid ruined a perfectly functional company/division due to being a poor judge of character and overly greedy?
Here’s my surprised face: -_-
DA2 had it IIRC but Inquisition didn’t, and it looks like it’s not in Veilguard because overview makes it look more like modern FF games which definitely don’t have anything like that.
So glad that the court system is working efficiently. This happened in 2020 and we’re only just now going to trial for it in 2024.
Yeah, I’m not completely getting this. The article reads as if the study was done just to waste time and really they wanted to propose their “if rideshare is done sustainably” suggestions.
I live in a place where a car is basically required for normal life. As such, my experience with ride-share services is exclusively when I’m traveling and thus don’t know the area super well. Ride-share rides “replace” a transit ride, yes, but in that it’s theoretically possible to have taken a different option, but does that mean that the public transit option is good or reasonable at that time or place?
Like, if my party and I have been out drinking for a while and are leaving, could we theoretically walk to a nearby subway station and figure out a couple of changes and get back home? Probably. Is it a lot easier to go “Hey Lyft/Uber please pick us up and drive us home while I wobble drunkenly in the back seat”? Yes. Does this count as a “replaced” ride? If ride-share didn’t exist, I would have had to take the public transit option (which is assuming that normal taxi’s didn’t also exist). If I knew I wouldn’t be able to ride-share home though, is there a serious chance that I would have just not done what I wanted and instead done something else while staying sober so that I could public transit home? Yes, definitely.
Ride-share to me just opens a new list of possibilities. If I know I’m relying on ride-share and I’m not worried about the cost, the list of things I can do goes up. It gives me more options for my evening. Are we saying here that that’s a problem and that people should feel limited to what they can access via public transit? I mean, fair argument but I don’t agree with it.
I didn’t say they were interesting, we didn’t get nearly enough interaction from them to know, but there was unarguably much more depth to them than “agent 123” in most shooters
Exactly, and the data shows that too. The number of questions were falling ever since the ‘game’ of the site became being able to shut down new questions with a variation of “this is a duplicate” in the exact mix of mean/demeaning/dismissive that would get the most clicks.