A strong hunchi.imgur.comimage SandbagTiara2816 ( @SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) Memes@lemmy.ml • 6 months ago message-square31fedilinkarrow-up1426
arrow-up1426imageA strong hunchi.imgur.com SandbagTiara2816 ( @SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) Memes@lemmy.ml • 6 months ago message-square31fedilink
minus-square DessertStorms ( @DessertStorms@kbin.social ) linkfedilink1•6 months ago The ‘victim card’ is the conservative ‘race card’. Except only one of those is real, while the other is made up by those trying to use the first…
minus-square stembolts ( @stembolts@programming.dev ) linkfedilink7•edit-26 months agoBoop beep I got delete.
minus-square lad ( @sukhmel@programming.dev ) linkfedilink2•6 months agoThey may have meant that “race card” is real and “victim cars” is not. But I still don’t think that is a valid point
minus-square stembolts ( @stembolts@programming.dev ) linkfedilink2•edit-26 months agoPossibly so. When they say the “first” I cannot tell if they mean the first one I mentioned or the first one they mentioned. Relative references in language is confusing!
minus-square lad ( @sukhmel@programming.dev ) linkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoTechnically, for referencing the previous parts there are “former” and “latter”, but you never know if it was not used intentionally or not.
Except only one of those is real, while the other is made up by those trying to use the first…
Boop beep I got delete.
They may have meant that “race card” is real and “victim cars” is not. But I still don’t think that is a valid point
Possibly so.
When they say the “first” I cannot tell if they mean the first one I mentioned or the first one they mentioned.
Relative references in language is confusing!
Technically, for referencing the previous parts there are “former” and “latter”, but you never know if it was not used intentionally or not.