- cross-posted to:
- automotive@discuss.tchncs.de
- technews@radiation.party
Japanese firm believes it could make a solid-state battery with a range of 745 miles that charges in 10 minutes
Japanese firm believes it could make a solid-state battery with a range of 745 miles that charges in 10 minutes
My partner and I have owned an EV since 2017, so I am going to weigh in with my experiences.
I think this is implying that you can rotate drivers without breaks to get more miles, and that is also not great. Yes, you’re stopping briefly to rotate seats, but that is not really a break unless you are taking a 15-30 minutes to nap or walk around a little bit. I’ve done this and it is not fun and does not feel like you have taken any breaks.
With the EV, we are forced to stop more on road trips, and we typically arrive feeling like we can actually do something rather than crash in the campsite/hotel. For reference, a road trip from Seattle to the middle of nowhere Idaho took a little longer, especially with a car that only had 180 miles of range, but the in the end we still got there in plenty of time and did not feel like going directly to bed.
If you are going uphill only, yes. That being said, regeneration has got to the point where if you are going downhill, you’ll recoup most of that lost energy.
This is not true at all. 50% range loss is not only not common, the top selling EVs get at most 30% range loss. Most are in the 15-20% loss range.
https://www.recurrentauto.com/research/winter-ev-range-loss
Basically, if you live or travel in an area with cold weather, make sure you get a car with a heat pump.
Again, if you are going uphill only in cold weather this is going to be closer to 2-2.5 hours based on this metric, but most people go up then down hills when driving.
This is absolutely the biggest issue. If you are sticking to the major highways you are usually fine, but more rural ares are seriously under served.
Someone else already went into way more detail on this one, but I will absolutely agree that the rural US needs more infrastructure.
This can and does happen. Trip planning requires a bit more effort because of it for sure, but there are tools (A Better Route Planner and PlugShare) that can help. If you take a lot of trips, getting a Tesla Tap and making sure you get hotels with Tesla destination chargers helps a lot.
This really depends on the DC fast charging ability of the car and the charging station infrastructure (which needs a ton of work). Most of the cars currently available have 150kWh fast charging, which will take you about 20-30 minutes per charge. With the Hyundai/Kia eGMP platform you can get 350kWh charging, which will take you about 15 minutes per charge if you get a 350kWh charging station. The only car I would not recommend if you road trip is a Chevy Bolt, which only has 50kWh DC fast charging.
For more info you should check out MKBHD’s video about road tripping against a gas car or Aging Wheels/Technology Connections video about road tripping with a Hyundai Ionic 5 (with 350kWh charging).
As an aside, as much as I hate Elon/think Teslas are not great cars, they are starting to open their charging network and big car companies are adopting their charging port. This will help a lot with infrastructure since they have one of the biggest networks in the US, and with an adapter you can use CCS chargers with a Tesla port, so you’re not loosing out on non-Tesla chargers.
Yes. Because you can literally sleep the other two hours your other shift is driving. We do it regularly.
That’s unfortunate for you. Every single person I know does fine rotating drivers. Semis also do it all the time and it’s considered safe enough.
Unfortunately not because the primary energy losses come from aerodynamics not from the climb. So you can recover a decent amount, and the slower you go the more you can theoretically approach 99% recovery, but in practice this is not the case.
🎶safety factors🎶
it was a comment on having to use alternate routes to stay charged, not on the actual duration of charging, which can potentially add up is still only around 20% added trip time.
Thank you for the links, I appreciate the thought but we have an EV in the family, most of what I’ve said here relates to safety and practical outcomes and considerations we’ve made and worst case scenarios. In other words we have already done road tripping ourselves.
The tesla charger was forced to be an open standard and is being adopted for practical reasons, which works out.
It is still not the same thing as taking a break. Some people can’t sleep in cars, most people don’t sleep well in cars. I’m glad you can. Just because you can does not mean most people can
Semis literally have beds in them. That is not the same as sleeping in a car
EVs take into account a ton of aero, and the aerodynamics don’t change going up or down hill. Also, in practice, regeneration going downhill does recuperate the range loss from going uphill. I have done it many, many times. Sometimes you even overcome range loss and end up with more than when you started if the descent is particularly steep, though that is much more rare.
You keep saying safety factors, but it seems to be based on just a hunch
That certainly can be a factor based on infrastructure. Again, we need a lot more out there
So do you have an EV or do you have family from out of town that does? You’ve kinda said both. Also, you have said you don’t want individual car arguments, but you seem to be basing everything on an individual car (the one in your family). The reality is the make/model of the car does make a difference, but it is becoming less and less of an issue as EV tech progresses, and a majority of them don’t have the issues you are concerned about. Unless you are road tripping in a gen 1 Leaf or Chevy Bolt, the concerns are more anxiety than anything.
My partner and I go camping a bunch (no charging stations in the bushes), road trip from Seattle down to Oregon quite a bit. Like I said, we have also done very long road trips, but those are more rare (as they are with most people). We have never run into an issue where the extra time was an issue, have never lost 40% range in the cold (with 3 different EVs), and have never had an issue with hills or mountains (again, we have always gone down the other side or back down the same way in the case of camping). Hell, we live in Seattle which is a steep city and my partner drives for work (75-100 miles/day) and have not run into these issues. I will say we are lucky to live on the west coast where the infrastructure is much better than other areas, but I have always agreed we need more infrastructure. Even so, now that we have a place to charge at night, we don’t use much of the local infrastructure (which is a privilege, I know).
More important than stuff we’ve been discussing (IMO, since most folks don’t actually road trip that much), I think more important things to argue for are infrastructure in rural areas, and infrastructure for people in apartments. Right now, not having a place to charge at night is a big barrier for most people in apartments. In rural areas, the distance between chargers is currently too high, though if folks have a place to charge at home, that is less of an issue for daily use.
K. Different people have different experiences. Given I was responding to someone’s assumption that cars only transfer 1 person at a time over long distances, I’m going to say my response was pretty safely addressing this exact point. Feel free to disagree.
True, and from personal experience the cars were more comfortable. Sleeper cabs are not that big.
See my other response.
Given one was explicit and the other is your inference this has been covered.
Right, because I’m offering conservative estimates on the details using it to counter an anecdotal belief to point out that it’s not exactly as simple as the op was commenting on. This discussion is so far removed and so terminally reddit, christ.
Something that is likely happening here is your definition of cold weather is not my definition of cold weather. Even the link I sent, which approaches 30%, barely touches below 20F. This is cold, sure, but not the most cold. Which when you are planning driving, you generally want to be able to drive in the worst conditions for your area so you don’t, you know, get stranded and/or die. Given temperatures in my area reach as low as -20F yearly you might benefit from reconsidering your assumptions.
These are entirely independent problems with independent research teams and are so removed from each other as “battery research” is obviously research, while “infrastructure every 50 miles” is political. These aren’t more or less important, they are entirely independent discussions.
This argument is so nitpicky and feels like bleed over from reddit. It’s not about anything useful, it’s about you misunderstanding the point I’m making and nitpicking the rhetoric until you’ve decided I’ve said something in a way you would have also said it, and therefore it is acceptable to you. I’m done here, have a good one.
Apologies for frustrating you. My whole point was to respond with your bullet list with more context from my experience. Have a good one