•  locuester   ( @locuester@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    515 months ago

    Kinda shitty of the chart creator to leave out 2018 and 2021. While the point still stands, it biases it against Netflix.

    It’s just purposefully misleading. Not cool, chart maker dude. Not cool.

  • For a streaming platform to be actually useful it needs to be a almost monopoly like steam. Netflix had a chance but missed the spot, due to the greed of Studios. So it’s back to fractured marked until someone comes with a fresh idea of how to distribute video.

    • Or many service providers competing on price, quality of service and features, not competing on exclusivity like they do now.

      Like grocery stores. Imagine if only one chain has the exclusive rights to sell potatoes and another one has rights to pasta. They can ask whatever price they want, because what you gonna do? Go to another store to get your 'taters cheaper? Hah, you’ll cry and you’ll pay what we ask! (BTW, growing your own potatos and sharing them with your neighbor infringes on our rights and is illegal. We’ll sue you to oblivion if we catch you doing it.)

      • Does not work for media, since media is a good that you need a specific version of. You don’t really care what potatoes you buy (simplification) but if you want to watch a specific show, movie or play a game -you can’t really subsidize it with another. So exclusivity does not work for potatoes but works for media. We would need a global overhaul of copyright to work this one out.

        •  tate   ( @tate@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          It totally works for media. Just need a law that says, if a work is published, anyone can distribute it for the same fair licensing fee. That’s the way “cover” music works - any cover band can play any other musician’s work. Nobody can refuse them that right. Then the venue where they perform pays a flat fee to an agency for the license. This doesn’t work great in music, but we could create a better model for streaming. it’s not impossible.

          • Musik industry has an extra layer of rights management companies that deal with exactly that issue. So I agree, we could create a legal framework or even an industry self regulating system to work that problem out. But I kind of said that already:

            We would need a global overhaul of copyright to work this one out.

      • Good point, I think it might have to do with the way music is differently licensed. You will often have a “monopolistic” rights management organization like BMI in USA whereas rights for video and games the rights management lies more with the overarching productions companies.

    •  Kichae   ( @Kichae@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m not sure why there are always monopoly apologists popping up in these. You know Netflix isn’t any less greedy than the studios, right? A private monopoly isn’t a good thing.

      • Why are you that antagonizing?

        A private monopoly isn’t a good thing.

        Most times. But for media, people want to have all their media in one place for a cheap price - so far only monopolistic or oligopolistic services were able to provide that. It worked quite well for games and in some form for music (you will often have single right management companies in the music industry - like BMI in USA or GEMA in Germany). But in general, I would agree that monopolies (outside natural monopolies and those should be run by the state) are unfavorable for the customer.

    • Netflix started out as a blessing. That’s why I bought a subscribtion intially. Nowadays they’ve been screwed over as much as I have and they suck as much as every other service, but I’m sticking with Netflix. It is the most convenient method for my kids to watch their stupid cartoons and I also get to enjoy something every once in a while. I’ve tried others, but it’s not worth it.

    • We have a way of doing that.

      It’s called Radarr, Sonarr, Jellyfin and a big fuck-off hard drive, and they won’t like it.

      But yeah, if there was a service with everything in high quality (up to 4K Blu-ray quality for those with the bandwidth) for like £30 a month (with no ads ever, and configurable UI that doesn’t try playing the next episode the millisecond the last one finishes), then they’d get paid for it. The longer they wait, the more entrenched into my setup I’ll be, and harder to wean off it.

  •  stown   ( @stown@sedd.it ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    375 months ago

    I get that “enshitification” is the hot new buzzword but cold we please give it a rest. Reading this community you start to think that people can’t express that the Internet is not to their liking in any other way.

    •  Barsukis   ( @Barsukis@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      155 months ago

      Yep. I used to share my account with my family before Netflix’s password sharing crackdown. When they did it, I deleted my account day 1.

      My dad and my sister just resubscribed separately. Unfortunately, a net win for them. Efectively +1 user. Just one example, but I’m betting this worked for many more of their users.

      •  Mkengine   ( @Mkengine@feddit.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I understand wanting them to go bankrupt (or be punished some other way) for their business practices, but they still produce a handful of good shows per year, so is it so bad that someone pays them for it? Be glad that enough people are throwing their money away so that you can pick their fruits. Maybe some day it’s too expensive for your dad and sister and then you are there to show them a better way.

      •  bitwolf   ( @bitwolf@lemmy.one ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I got this same deal from T-Mobile a while back, it gave Netflix with two screens.

        Eventually my Dad went and got an upgrade and they raised his price. He asked to join my plan so we split the bill.

        Easy, two screens two accounts, we each had our own login through Netflix family.

        I have since moved away for a job, and now he can’t use Netflix because we have different addresses. We can’t use a license we rightfully own as it was originally sold to us.

        I wish they offered another video service instead. I’d rather swap to it and not even use it just to spite the hasty cash grab Netflix made.

    • And their recommendation engine sucks.

      Netflix used to be famously good at suggesting films. Articles were written about it, and there was even a cash reward for anyone who could contribute to its performance. Then it just turned to shit.

      And the funny thing is that it would have helped counteract the shrinking library. Sure, there would be fewer films on the platform, so you’d be less likely to find a specific title, but at least you could select a film Netflix recommended based on your past ratings and be fairly confident you’d enjoy it. Now? Absolutely not.

      • I find the same thing with music streaming on Spotify. I used to discover lots of new music I liked on it but these days I can’t get it to generate an interesting playlist. It’s songs I already know interspersed with things that are boring. Seems like the recommendations got worse.

        • I quit Spotify when the “New Library Experience” completely fucked the music library side of the app. If you mostly use playlists, it was a lateral change. If you used it to collect some songs here, and album there, and keep them all sorted, it’s like it dumped your entire collection on the floor and expected a thank-you for the new organization system.

          My guess, as others have mentioned, is that Spotify tries to squeeze more profits by pushing certain songs, whether because they get paid to promote them, or the royalties are lower. That’s easier to do with their playlists and recommendations, so they pushed people to that side of the app by making everything else dogshit. And now, apparently, the curated side took it too far and is awful, too.

          I still use Apple Music, which is one of like two services that actually let you organize your music in a sensible way outside of playlists. That said, after I cut cords with video streaming services and set up my own library, I think I might do the same with music.

          • Discovery was always the thing that made streaming services better than buying recordings individually. If these services stop being good for finding new music, then there’s not much reason to keep using them.

    •  Blackmist   ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      135 months ago

      And they change the pictures around all the time to make you think it’s something new, when in fact you’ve seen it before. And because it’s bland as all fuck, you notice this like 45 minutes in.

      •  JCPhoenix   ( @JCPhoenix@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Movies and TV are some peoples’ hobbies. I have a co-worker who used to spend $300/mo on a cable bill because she had all the movie channels and stuff. She watched tons of movies and shows. At first I thought she was weird for watching so much TV, but then I thought about how much gaming I do, and realized “Oh, that’s just her hobby like gaming is mine.” Granted, I’m not spending $300/mo on gaming, but people do tend to spend money on hobbies. Sometimes even more than $300/mo.

        Anyway, I’ve been letting her use my Netflix account – surprisingly neither of us have seen anything from Netflix about it – for the last several years. She recently (finally) got a Smart TV so she cancelled her crazy-ass cable package and I think pays for YouTube TV now. I’m sure she’s watching just as much as TV and movies as ever, but at least she’s saving some money.

        • Uh that makes sense. I guess my original comment is more out of jealousy: I have so many movies that I want to watch, but I have never find the time and energy to do so. After work, dinner, chat, duolingo, and lunch prep for my wife, I barely find any time during my night, and it is kind of frustrating for me.

          Last year, I have only finished like less than 5 from like 50 titles.

          I am glad people are enjoying their hobby. I personally would not be on Netflix anymore as most of the movie I want to watch is not on there, but I can now kind of see it might be worth it for others.

          It also surprises me that this large amount of the population takes movie and TV as a hobby.

          • Gotcha, apologies for the misread!

            Honestly, I was surprised too. I guess given how ubiquitous movies and television are, it never really occurred to me that it could be a hobby. And I bet most people don’t think of it as a hobby, either. When I think of a hobby related to TV/Movies, I think more like “film snobs” (for lack of a better term). Maybe people who watch the AFI 100 or whatever and know all about film and cinematography. But not people just watching TV like anyone else. But by definition, it’s a hobby. It’s “a pursuit outside one’s regular occupation engaged in especially for relaxation.”

            For my coworker, she’s single and childless. So she has tons of time to watch movies and shows outside of work. I’m the same, but I devote it mainly towards gaming. Though I could certainly stand to devote less time to my hobby. Or pick up some new ones at least!

            Hope you’ll be able to find some more time to watch the movies and show you want!

        •  diyrebel   ( @diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You might let her know that she can borrow DVDs from the public library at no cost. Another little-known gratis option is freesat and terrestrial broadcast. I recently started using MythTV as a PVR to record broadcast TV and was pleasantly surprised to find no commercial interruptions (but if there are commercials in her region, MythTV can cut them out).

  • After seeing this post a couple times (which speaks to its relevance) it got me thinking that enshittification (of the world) will definitely continue until our morale improves, as in until we make them stop. Are there any online collectives that work together to stop this tomfoolery?

      • Long term, this is probably the consequence. But to delete a giant tree (or tumour, decide your own mental image) you have to cut it back, then cut it down, then rip out the roots, one after the other.

        You can also rip it out at once but you need giant machines and will cause tons of damage to the environment and leave a giant crater.

        I dont think capitalism is even the whole tree. Its actually greed and selfishness which needs to go.

        People who miss the basic empathy to take from others just because they can need to be educated and - if needed - contained and pathologized as to keep them from winning against the fair and „gullible“. This will be insanely complex and long to eradicate that.

        But step one is joining a collective to change things. All positive change came from collectives, never from individuals. Individuals are easy to beat, to intimidate, to silence. But groups are very hard to do this to.

        Doing something to lift the dread off your heart and getting change going is the most sane approach imo.

        •  Zworf   ( @Zworf@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          I dont think capitalism is even the whole tree. Its actually greed and selfishness which needs to go.

          This is because capitalism glorifies greed and selfishness and considers it the primary driver or human behaviour. Which it isn’t for everyone. Many of us leftists vote left despite it not being in our personal financial beat interests. Sharing is caring etc.

          Unfortunately the system is so damn rigged in favour of the multi billionaires.

          • I think capitalism favors greed and selfishness because greedy, selfish people have corrupted an otherwise useful idea. I dont think the original iteration was bad. We just left the door to the machine room ajar and a bunch of trolls laid some cables to steal power from our generator. Actually a very fitting metaphor. The sad part is that we‘re still trying to agree on the fact that someone is stealing energy.

            If you have seen lord of the rings, society is the ents, discussing endlessly if the hobbits are actually hobbits or orcs while their forest is being cut down en masse. Thats how I view humanity atm.

            •  Zworf   ( @Zworf@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              I don’t agree. Capitalism is and has always been about greed. It’s why people invest, to get maximum profits and externalise all the negative side-effects.

              I think capitalism works if it’s balanced with socialism and strongly restricted by law as we used to do in the Netherlands and some EU countries still do. Unfortunately the Netherlands was lost to the neoliberals and now to the fascists :( But luckily I don’t live there anymore.

              • I can see how you arrive at this conclusion. Not sure I necessarily follow it since I invest (and always have) in things I believe in. Buying additional plates is an investment in having guests over for example.

                But I‘m also neurologically different from most peeps. The folks that invest without empathy fall into two categories in my head: the ignorant and the evil. The ignorant need to be educated, by force if necessary. The evil need to be stopped.

                Still, I can see that capitalism has become corrupted and needs to go. It’s too complicated for everyone to understand its side effects. Maybe even for me. But I still think its people born or raised without a conscience that will corrupt anything we build. Those need to be stopped as well.

      •  diyrebel   ( @diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Ending capitalism is not the /only/ way. Within a capitalistic system, you can boycott shit. Most consumers are pushovers but it doesn’t have to be that way. I’m boycotting hundreds of shitty companies. Off the top of my head:

        • Amazon
        • Cloudflare
        • Microsoft
        • Facebook
        • Google
        • Apple
        • (surveillance advertisers in general)
        • (all closed-source s/w)
        • HP
        • Proctor & Gamble
        • Unilever
        • all ALEC members (American Express, Anheuser Busch, Boeing, CenturyLink, Charter Communications, Chevron, FedEx, Motorola, PNC bank, Sony, TimeWarner)
        • many shitty banks
        • Paypal
        • AT&T
        • GMA members (Coke, Pepsi, Kraft - Heinz, Kellogg’s, General Mills, McCormick, Hormel, Smucker)
        • BetterThanCashAlliance.org members (visa, mastercard, unilever) – war on cash
        • Bayar-Monsanto
        • Dupont
        • Hershey
        • Nestlé
        • Exxon/Mobil
        • Comcast
        • Koch
        • Home Depot
        • Lowes
        • …etc

        Those are all shitty companies that significantly worsen the world. Giving money or data to any of them contributes to enshitification of the world.

        Of course it’s an option to stop supporting assholes. Become ethical. Be the change you want to see.

    •  diyrebel   ( @diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I didn’t see the OP’s pic but these groups generally work against enshitification of the world:

      Notice that none of those communities are on Cloudflared instances (thus also avoid propagating the enshitified portion of the fedi).