Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Karna ( KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml )  to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

Tor says it’s "still safe" amid reports of police deanonymizing users

www.bleepingcomputer.com

external-link
message-square
29
link
fedilink
119
external-link

Tor says it’s "still safe" amid reports of police deanonymizing users

www.bleepingcomputer.com

Karna ( KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml )  to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago
message-square
29
link
fedilink
Just a moment...
www.bleepingcomputer.com
external-link
  • ExtremeDullard ( ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    The TOR network itself is safe - at least assuming the TLAs don’t control at least half of the nodes, which is far from impossible. But let’s assume…

    The weak point comes from the browser: that’s how the fuzz deanonymizes users. The only safe browser to use on TOR is the TOR browser, and that’s the problem: it disables so many unsafe functionalities that it’s essentially unusable on a lot of websites. So people use regular browsers over TOR, the browser leaks identifying data and that’s how they get caught.

    • delirious_owl ( delirious_owl@discuss.online ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      My understanding is that Tor Browser works fine, there’s just some dumb website owners that block Tor traffic by IP address.

      • CCRhode ( CCRhode@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        And … guess what … www.bleepingcomputer.com, the source of the story, is one of those.

        • delirious_owl ( delirious_owl@discuss.online ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 years ago

          Maybe email them and let them know about the misconfiguration

          Let them know that tor users can’t read their article about Tor

          • CCRhode ( CCRhode@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            CRhode

            Done!

    • Trainguyrom ( Trainguyrom@reddthat.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, the advice I’ve heard for one who’s threat model is “the feds are actively trying to identify me” is to have a dedicated burner computer that you do all of your illegal activities on and no other activities. Then of course on top of that avoid saving secrets onto the device and type them in manually every time (ephemeral distros like Tails are good for that)

    • chappedafloat ( chappedafloat@lemmy.wtf ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Do you think it’s better to use a VPN if you aren’t using TOR Browser?

      • schnurrito ( schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        All VPNs do is change who has your browsing data: your ISP or the VPN operator. You may or may not trust either of them not to keep records, in either case you have no way of verifying this.

        • HelixDab2 ( HelixDab2@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 years ago

          ISPs definitely keep records. At least some VPNs claim that they don’t, and that their networks are set up in such a way that they can’t. Some organizations claim to validate the claims of the VPNs, but it’s unclear if they’re trustworthy.

          So your choice is to use something that definitely keeps logs, or to use a company that at least says that they don’t/can’t.

          • communism ( communism@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes, and there’s also the fact that some VPNs such as Mullvad let you be anonymous so even if Mullvad were keeping logs, if you pay privately they have no way of knowing whose logs they are (unless the content itself of your internet history reveals your identity). Meanwhile your ISP definitely knows who you are, and absolutely will collaborate with the police if asked to.

            • electric_nan ( electric_nan@lemmy.ml ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 years ago

              You can pay anonymously, but if you regularly connect from your home IP address, it hardly matters.

              • sunzu2 ( sunzu2@thebrainbin.org ) BannedBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                I think the point here is to deny ISP data to sell.

                • electric_nan ( electric_nan@lemmy.ml ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah I use mullvad for mostly that reason myself.

          • Possibly linux ( possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            The VPN company themselves may not keep logs. However, they might be a little black box somewhere in the data center…

            • NauticalNoodle ( NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 years ago

              As Proton made evident, VPNs can be legally compelled to start keeping logs on specific accounts as the result of a court order. So if you’re gonna do something incriminating, then I guess you should create a new account each time.

              • orcrist ( orcrist@lemm.ee ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 years ago

                deleted by creator

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1.42K users / month
  • 6.39K users / 6 months
  • 852 local subscribers
  • 51.4K subscribers
  • 4.57K Posts
  • 59.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t ( k_o_t@lemmy.ml ) 
  • tmpod ( tmpod@lemmy.pt ) 
  • Yayannick ( Yayannick@lemmy.ml ) 
  • ranok ( ranok@sopuli.xyz ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code