- cross-posted to:
- nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
You must log in or # to comment.
Except if they were halfway intelligent they wouldn’t have it go automatically to the site.
And when you do this and something goes really wrong criminal charges get laid.
I’m not sure if you could actually get criminal charges for this unless you were hosting the malware in which case that’s another issue. It would essentially be the same as walking around with a website URL on your shirt. The observer is responsible for typing in the URL or scanning the code and what they decide to do on the website that follows.
There’s the argument that you distrubuted it.
got it from a thrift shop, I don’t even know what that square thing is
I don’t know about the states, but here in Canada the government takes the position “ignorance of the law is not a defence”.
You’re not being ignorant of the law - you’re being ignorant of the weird computer square printed on the shirt you thrifted
Claiming you didn’t know it could cause harm isn’t a defense in court in Canada.
Anymore bullshit?
Christ you’re a cordial fellow
I was, I thought quite clearly, having a joking poke. Obviously “didn’t know lol” isn’t a defense.
“Malice” implies intent. Accidents are not malicious. Neglect in the worst case. So certainly any charges could not be based on malice.
I tend to agree that this is how it should be, that doesn’t mean that’s how it is. If you walk around with a T-shirt that says “kill all CEOs” along with where to find them, you’re going to run into some trouble, despite being a similar situation- you’re just giving instructions, it’s up to the viewer what to do with them.
Except the shirt doesn’t say “visit this site, there are cool things on it”. If you’re gonna make the comparison to CEOs then it would be like putting a CEOs address on your shirt.
Except that people are not halfway intelligent.
Often the apps are from what I know. Most ones I’ve used don’t open the link straight away
Criminal charges? It’s called the 1st amendment bro.
Not if it incites violence, causes harm or any of the other carve outs in the first amendment of the USA.
I am aware that the post is supposed to be funny, and you are most likely making a joke, but this is the internet and these sort of disclaimers tend to be necessary.
A smart attack would be coupled with a clear message. Have the malware clobber them with anti-evil messages and just like that you have a sound free speech defense.
a URL to malware doesn’t cause harm, the idiot who opens it does.
Why not just use this one?
Dairy Queen, word for word.
I’ll skip it :)
The largest QR code can hold up to 3 kb of data, which is more than enough to write a nasty virus in an injectable script if aimed at specific devices/apps. The main hurdle is breaking the app to execute the code instead of treating it as a string. It’s the Drop Bobby Tables joke. Developers hopefully don’t fall for this anymore.
Anyway. Making a shitty link and leading people there isn’t a new idea. You don’t even need a t-shirt. Hackers already place their own printed QR labels on top of otherwise real codes, and the user might not even notice, because they’ll be redirected to the right site after the dirty deed is done dirt cheap.
deleted by creator
X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*
Probably the closest you’re going to get
Correct :-) Has been done:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210116105900/https://www.revk.uk/2020/01/eicar-test-qr.html
Depending on what they plan to use the video for, a middle finger can be sufficient.
Tragically they were beaten to death in broad daylight by police, but there was no surviving evidence.
@compostgoblin I am up for one of those.
