Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Florencia (she/her) ( florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone )  to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years ago

Signal is not the place for top secret communications, but it might be the right choice for you – a cybersecurity expert on what to look for in a secure messaging app

theconversation.com

external-link
message-square
77
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
308
external-link

Signal is not the place for top secret communications, but it might be the right choice for you – a cybersecurity expert on what to look for in a secure messaging app

theconversation.com

Florencia (she/her) ( florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone )  to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
77
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Keeping your chats secure is a good idea, but end-to-end encryption is just the beginning of the list of options to consider when picking a messaging app.
  • Termight ( Termight@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Here are two reasons you might not want to use Signal: Your contacts, your settings, your entire Signal experience is tied to a Signal account managed by Signal. Metadata—who you’re talking to, when, and how often—can still be collected and analyzed. Question everything.

    • sqgl ( sqgl@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      “The only metadata that Signal would have access to, is the phone number used to register, the date of initial registration, and the date of last use.”

      https://www.reddit.com/r/signal/comments/exd92f/what_kind_of_usermessage_metadata_is_observed_and/

    • Special Wall ( specialwall@midwest.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      The issue of centralization can be a problem, but in regards to metadata, sealed sender does a lot to prevent Signal’s servers from knowing who messages who, which makes Signal a lot more private than described here.

    • quincunx ( quincunx@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      So use no messenger? Any decentralized options?

      • sqgl ( sqgl@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        SimpleX is decentralized, requires no phone number, based on Signal code. Screws up invitations via FB/Messenger though.

        • HotCoffee ( HotCoffee@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Salute fellow simplex enjoyer 🗿

        • quincunx ( quincunx@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thank you

      • Termight ( Termight@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        So use no messenger? Any decentralized options?

        Alternatives to Signal that prioritize decentralized communication.

        • Briar Project (https://briarproject.org/ ): A compelling choice for censorship resistance. Briar employs peer-to-peer messaging, connecting via Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or Tor, and incorporates privacy features by design. It’s a robust solution for those concerned about surveillance.
        • Delta Chat (https://delta.chat/ ): A decentralized and secure messenger application. It’s often praised for its ease of use and integration with existing email accounts.
        • XMPP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMPP ): Less of an application and more of a foundational protocol. XMPP is an open standard for instant messaging, allowing for decentralized implementations – though setting up and maintaining such a system requires a degree of technical expertise.

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 66 users / day
  • 718 users / week
  • 2.92K users / month
  • 6.76K users / 6 months
  • 852 local subscribers
  • 51.1K subscribers
  • 4.55K Posts
  • 59.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t ( k_o_t@lemmy.ml ) 
  • tmpod ( tmpod@lemmy.pt ) 
  • Yayannick ( Yayannick@lemmy.ml ) 
  • ranok ( ranok@sopuli.xyz ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code