You must log in or # to comment.
Somebody coming across this and briefly checking out the context section could think this is just a regular old mass surveillance law, but when you look at the High Level Group advice EU is citing as a key source you’ll see the full image.
The craziest thing is that when a German MEP Patrick Breyer asked the EU to release the names of the people who were a part of the so called High Level Group that wrote this proposal, they replied with a list with all names blacked out. Here is Patrick Breyer’s own blog post on the subject
According to Edri ”The HLG has kept its work sessions closed, by strictly controlling which stakeholders got invited and effectively shutting down civil society participation.”. Very nice.
You can read the full High Level Group proposal here.TL;DR
they want to sanction unlicensed messaging apps, hosting services and websites that don’t spy on users (and impose criminal penalties)
mandatory data retention, all your online activity must be tied to your identity
end of privacy friendly VPN’s and other services
cooperate with hardware manufacturers to ensure lawful access by design (backdoors for phones and computers)
And much, much more. And this law isn’t aimed towards big companies, all communication service providers are explicitly in scope no matter how small or open source.
A mass surveillance law being written by unknown lobbyists behind closed doors, demanding that the EU should monitor the internet more than Russia, being pushed by the EU commission. Should be the biggest news of the decade, but isn’t.
Also, EU commission (Ursula, Virkkunen, Brunner as the key players) are using the same high level group as a key source in their ProtectEU plan, which is their strategy for 2029 and includes restricting encryption. Politico article on the subject
Yeah, it’s a blatant attempt to establish a draconic police state for the average citizenry, abhorrent shit.
deleted by creator
Why do you think they cooperate with hardware manufacturers instead of OS producers or infiltrating the FOSS community harder?
I can’t wait for the first fully open source computer.
And if anyone needs to send an email to MEP from your country about how concerning this initiative is.
We must talk about this and raise awareness.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/full-list/all
All elected MEP, download the pdf and search on your country name or party. (no alternative since there is no search functionnalities on that page sadly)
My feedback: stop this bullshit and focus on actual problems.
Can we go 5 minutes without someone proposing a ridicilous law?!
Can’t they focus on problems that actually matter?!
The Europol’s precog crime-prevention AI needs to be fed again, I see. I’m assuming this is “for the safety of our children” again.
The only needed response is “no”.
Why do they use American SSOs?
Um… I’ve read the document, where does it say anything nefarious? All I can see is unifying requirements for metadata storage and time to live?
As in - to what exactly should I object, where’s the hidden poison?
Done.
It’s great that the EU asks for feedback like this
While coming up with such flawed laws as well. I doubt they even look at the feedback
