• Hjalmar ( Hjalamanger@feddit.nu ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      I only studied french for a short time, but I feel like that really doesn’t work for french:

      • chemisier, blouse, is masculine
      • ceinture, belt, is feminine

      Those were the two onces I could remember like this half a year after ending my french studies, but could be that those are only two uncommon counterexamples.

      Also, both of these are what you would “expect” in German (die Bluse, der Gürtel)

        • FundMECFS ( FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          vaiselle is actually inhereting its gender in an unrelated manner.

          It comes from Latin vāscellum which is a Neuter noun.

          But the specific form that gave rise to vaiselle was the collective plural of that noun vāscella. source

          And it’s a common pattern that in vulgar latin, (what gave rise to french), collective plural nouns were interpreted as feminine. I think this is a general tendency and unrelated to the noun’s meaning. The reason often given is that neuter plural endings and feminine singular endings were the same in Latin.

          BTW; this is also the latin root of the english word vessel.

          (PS: I agree with you that gender in language is problematic and I prefer non gendered as well).

    • Qwel ( Qwel@sopuli.xyz ) deleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’ll be right 50% of the times. Or 33% in german. And it doesn’t match between languages. Like, “cat” is a she in german and a he in french. Often synonyms have different genders : une lettre/un courrier (both mean a mail).

      I think the issue is that you are searching your mind for correlations between gender and sexism-related, which is often easier than searching for non-correlation. If I ask you “quick, think of a singer that wears leather”, you’ll find one instantly. But if I ask “quick, find a singer that doesn’t wear leather” it takes a while, even though there more of them.

      If you want a better impression of the phenomenon, open a dictionary, go over words one by one and count the points.


      And also “organ” (the instrument) in french is male when singular and female when plural. “C’est un bel orgue” and “Ce sont de belles orgues”.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝 ( HK65@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s what I love about my native Hungarian, even pronouns are ungendered.

      Everything else is stupid complicated though. We have tonal harmony to worry about instead.

  • CompactFlax ( CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Mark Twain also struggled with language

    To continue with the German genders: a tree is male, its buds are female, its leaves are neuter; horses are sexless, dogs are male, cats are female—tomcats included, of course; a person’s mouth, neck, bosom, elbows, fingers, nails, feet, and body are of the male sex, and his head is male or neuter according to the word selected to signify it, and NOT according to the sex of the individual who wears it—for in Germany all the women wear either male heads or sexless ones; a person’s nose, lips, shoulders, breast, hands, and toes are of the female sex; and his hair, ears, eyes, chin, legs, knees, heart, and conscience haven’t any sex at all. The inventor of the language probably got what he knew about a conscience from hearsay.

  • Lushed_Lungfish ( Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    I asked my Francophone buddy that grew up in backwoods Quebec how the hell he kept it all in his head. He said that he never bothered.

    If it had an “e” on the end, he just assumed it was feminine.

    If he was drunk, he didn’t give a single flying tabernak.

    • Qwel ( Qwel@sopuli.xyz ) deleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      How does anyone manage to keep allll the words pronunciation and spelling they know is already amazing, craming pronouns on top of that isn’t much worse

    • Rothe ( Rothe@piefed.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is not a problem for native speakers though. These kinds of things are only something you think about if you are learning it as a second language later in life. If you grew up with them you just aborb the information and use it without thinking about it.

    • SorryQuick ( SorryQuick@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s a pattern to it. I don’t know what it is, and I’m not sure anyone knows consciously. But for example, when creating new words (eg. fantasy/sci-fi context) there usually isn’t any confusion as to what that word’s gender will be, it just sounds bad with the wrong pronoun. There are a few exceptions of course, same as “autobus” and “avion” which technically have a gender assigned but people toss a coin every time.

    • Cheesus ( Cheesus@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      In French, it’s ‘le pénis,’ but nobody says that. ‘Dick,’ is feminine (la bite.)

      Also, ‘vagina’ is masculine, but ‘pussy’ is feminine, because if you were to say ‘le chat’ it would mean a cat, but by feminising the word, it becomes ‘la chatte,’ meaning pussy.

      As someone who grew up Anglophone, I actually find gendered languages much more precise. On the other hand, in order to make yourself understood one must have a rich vocabulary, because the definitions of words are often more narrow than in English.

      And don’t even get me started on phrasal verbs… English is messy.

      • I don’t get the weirdness of phrasal verbs? It’s a basic staple of every Indoeuropean language to generate verbs by tacking on prepositions. Ok, it’s a bit weird to use prepositions after the word, but that’s just standard Germanic separable verbs that are a bit regulized. So what?

        • Cheesus ( Cheesus@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re just so ubiquitous in English. In my experience, people coming from the Romance languages have a very hard time with them, because most of the actions they describe are a single verb in their mother tongues. Imagine having to remember what two words mean, but then also having to remember that when you use the two words together, they form a distinct, sometimes even unrelated, meaning.

          And there’s thousands.

          • Well, Romance languages have thousands, too, like e.g. French poser and sup-poser, dé-poser, re-poser, trans-poser, pro-poser, im-poser, ex-poser, pré-poser, anté-poser, op-poser, super-poser, com-poser, juxta-poser, ap-poser, dis-poser, postposer,

            If I call up a random French or Spanish article on wikipedia, a decent amount, if not the majority of verbs (not counting auxilliary verbs) are compounds. Somehow Romance speakers seem to have lost the ability to spot them, a Mexican coworker of mine was absolutely convinced Spanish does not have compound verbs as well.

            Oh – I see. The Romance prepositions have changed. Knowing Latin I cannot not recognise the loads of compound verbs, but with sur, de, derriere, travers, par, en, hors, avant and so on the compounds are not recognisable any longer and our poor Romance friends have to learn all the words by themselves instead of nice semilogical groups.

  • One of my languages has three genders for living creatures, and two genders for items. Those genders are all different from each other: humans and other living beings are male/female/living neutral, things are item neutral/item neutral. An item neutral plural is also used for groups of living beings, but not for all groups of items.

    One item neutral singular can in some instances be used for a living being regardless of their gender. The other item neutral would be insulting if used about living beings, and especially dehumanising to humans (wish someone had told me this sooner).

    I have no idea when to use which item neutral. Locals keep correcting me or almost imperceptibly wincing when I get it wrong, so when I want to sound more fluent I just use the item plural for singulars as well - it seems less annoying for some reason.

    Oh, and for one of the item neutrals, if you accidentally use the other item neutral it means the plural of the first one. Kill me now, lol.

  • menas ( menas@lemmy.wtf ) 
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    no rules, no sens, only disdain

    L’Académie Française existed since the 18th century to make the language too complex “for the common and the women”

  • vga ( vga@sopuli.xyz ) BannedBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    And for some reason it seems to be quite jarring for french native speakers if somebody uses the wrong gender. I have tried to learn french for like 10 years and I have received absolutely no feelings about either the right or wrong genders. Both of them always sound just as fine.

    la baguette? le baguette? No difference. But that’s how it works of course.

  • pedz ( pedz@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s the same gender than all machines, which is obviously feminine.

    There’s no fixed rule for this but if a noun ends with a consonant it’s probably masculine and if it ends with a vowel it’s possibly feminine. Again, not a consistent rule and it will not work for everything, but if you must take a guess, this might help, or not.

    Now this reminds me of Sebastian Marx and his videos on French. Like this one on pronunciation.