Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
seasonone ( seasonone@opidea.xyz )  to World News@lemmy.ml · 3 years ago

The U.K. Government Is Very Close To Eroding Encryption Worldwide

www.eff.org

external-link
message-square
28
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • fightforprivacy@feddit.ch
  • privacy@monero.town
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • technews@radiation.party
  • hackernews@derp.foo
  • unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
  • tech@kbin.social
  • technology@lemmy.ml
112
external-link

The U.K. Government Is Very Close To Eroding Encryption Worldwide

www.eff.org

seasonone ( seasonone@opidea.xyz )  to World News@lemmy.ml · 3 years ago
message-square
28
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • fightforprivacy@feddit.ch
  • privacy@monero.town
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • technews@radiation.party
  • hackernews@derp.foo
  • unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
  • tech@kbin.social
  • technology@lemmy.ml
The U.K. Parliament is pushing ahead with a sprawling internet regulation bill that will, among other things, undermine the privacy of people around the world. The Online Safety Bill, now at the final stage before passage in the House of Lords, gives the British government the ability to force...
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • catsup ( catsup@lemmy.one ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    Outrageous. I would actually be protesting if this were to happen in my country, and you wouldn’t hear the end of it. Protect-the-children my ass, this is an attack on the freedom of the common folk. Criminals will continue to use encryption even if its against the law; they were already commiting crimes, so what’s one more in the list?

  • kool_newt ( kool_newt@lemm.ee ) deleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • socsa ( socsa@lemmy.ml ) BannedBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      This is exactly why this shit is stupid. Basic private key infrastructure will never have the backdoors they believe they need. Nor should it. The principles and algorithms are simply too well known, and there are far too many code examples to truly put this cat back in the bag. All this does is make the average person less secure while doing nothing to actual spies, terrorists or organized criminals.

    • seasonone ( seasonone@opidea.xyz ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      It will be if you don’t give them backdoor.

      • bane_killgrind ( bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        They can take my back door by force

        • bingbong ( bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Ooh la la

  • ghost_laptop ( gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    How is a country going to end encryption worldwide? The West okay, bu what jurisdiction do they have over me?

    • happyhippo ( happyhippo@feddit.it ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      That’s what I also fail to grasp.

      If things get serious and for example the WhatsApp, Telegram and Signals of the world have to disable e2ee to keep operating in the UK, I guess they could just leave that market before compromising data privacy of their users worldwide.

      I don’t see this “ending encryption worldwide” thingy happening, at all.

      But they could dig themselves a deeper hole after Brexit, that’s definitely possible and wouldn’t surprise me a bit.

      • ghost_laptop ( gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Or ship specific versions of their software for the UK, as it is done with other software in other countries with restrictions.

        • perezoso ( perezoso@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          A lot of them have already said they’d withdraw (facetime, iMessage, signal, WhatsApp included).

    • seasonone ( seasonone@opidea.xyz ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Just make a list how many companies tech companies operate from west. All those companies have to follow the law of the homeland.

      • ghost_laptop ( gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Sure, but most of those companies didn’t even care much about privacy any way. How would this affect Matrix for example?

        • f314 ( f314@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          Apple have already said they will shut down iMessage support in the UK if the bill passes.

        • seasonone ( seasonone@opidea.xyz ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          this cryptographer working thing which will affect quantum computing, blockchain and integration of data. I don’t know much about Matrix so I can’t comment on that.

    • itchy_lizard ( itchy_lizard@feddit.it ) BannedBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Not even the West. Just the UK.

    • Shikadi ( Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Idk where you live, but much of the world already lacks privacy

      • GunnarRunnar ( GunnarRunnar@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        What you said means pretty much nothing if you don’t take the time to explain it.

        • Shikadi ( Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          What I meant is, I literally don’t know where you live, so I don’t know why it doesn’t impact you “outside the west”

  • Shjosan ( Shjosan@sockermunk.se ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    This bill seems to be all sort of bad (maybe with some good intentions), really hope it doesn’t pass to not give other countries any ideas

    • ISOmorph ( ISOmorph@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 years ago

      Please don’t fall in that trap. Authoritarian attacks on citizens have always been neatly wrapped in either anti-terrorism or protect-the-children propaganda since the dawn of politics. This is a very obvious and delibirate attempt to further remove freedom from the common folk.

  • worfamerryman ( worfamerryman@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s not really that hard to deploy a matrix server. So this bill is dumb as anyone who wants encrypted messages can easily have them.

    • ReversalHatchery ( ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’m all for Matrix, but the things is, Matrix is primarily developed by people in the UK. They will be easily forced to implement backdoors.

      • worfamerryman ( worfamerryman@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        That’s good to know🙏

        Hopefully some trustworthy third party can audit the code if this ever becomes a thing.

        • ReversalHatchery ( ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          I’m not sure auditing would be enough. We would literally need a development team outside of dictatoric countries like the UK, where such things can be forced.

  • CoachDom ( CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Would VPN protect an individual against such actions?

    • thejml ( thejml@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      VPN will encrypt your communications between your local PC/phone/device and the VPN server you connect to. After that, the data packet transits just as if you’re anywhere else. So if they can crack that encryption, your data is still open. They might not know where the packet came from, but if you are talking PII, that’s not really important. (Does it really matter what IP you had when you tell them your health history and name? Or full banking info?)

      • CoachDom ( CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        I really don’t like that.

        Even if it will get dismissed/amended so it doesn’t ruin open and private internet, the direction it’s all going really worries me. Every couple of months/years you will hear that the governments are trying again and again…Eventually they will succeed - enter “1984”

      • CoachDom ( CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        What about decentralised solutions like Matrix? I think they would have hard time accessing anything if it’s stored on a private server. EDIT: Or is it on ISP level? So no matter how you access/communicate - it will all be scanned the point when data leaves your device and communicates with web.

      • itchy_lizard ( itchy_lizard@feddit.it ) BannedBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Why would they get a VPN to exit from the UK tho lol

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !worldnews@lemmy.ml

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1 user / month
  • 2.85K users / 6 months
  • 1.07K local subscribers
  • 41.8K subscribers
  • 17.4K Posts
  • 54K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin ( Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml ) 
  • AgreeableLandscape ( AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml ) deleted by creator
  • Jack. ( jackmarxist@lemmy.ml ) 
  • zephyreks ( zephyreks@lemmy.ml ) Banned
  • OurToothbrush ( OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code