Fubarberry ( Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ) to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agoCombining two different internet debatessopuli.xyzimagemessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1559
arrow-up1559imageCombining two different internet debatessopuli.xyzFubarberry ( Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ) to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square91linkfedilink
minus-squarePlayer2 ( Player2@sopuli.xyz ) linkfedilinkarrow-up45·3 years agoPortal would fail due to being placed on moving object
minus-squareEdge004 ( Edge004@lemm.ee ) linkfedilinkarrow-up10·3 years agoExcept for that one section in Portal 2 /s
minus-squareinsomniac_lemon ( insomniac_lemon@kbin.social ) linkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-23 years agoWhy the /s? It’s true. Obviously it makes for simpler puzzle design plus was easier to ignore the full capability (even the version in 2 seems to just work enough to allow the set-piece), so it seems silly to use developer limitation as a gotcha.
Portal would fail due to being placed on moving object
Except for that one section in Portal 2 /s
Why the
/s?It’s true. Obviously it makes for simpler puzzle design plus was easier to ignore the full capability (even the version in 2 seems to just work enough to allow the set-piece), so it seems silly to use developer limitation as a gotcha.