• I’ve never got this either. I’ve been using Linux exclusively for over 4 years, multiple devices, tested dozens of distros, almost all Systemd-based and I havent ever experienced any problems that the anti-systemd folks talk about.

      Or at least, they were so rare and minimal that I didn’t notice.

      Coming from an IT background dealing with 99% Windows machines and Microsoft products, maybe my bar was on the floor, but Linux has been soooo much more stable and dependable than Windows.

      • Helix 🧬 ( Helix@feddit.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 years ago

        Been using Linux since 2004 and systemd has made my life significantly easier. People bickering about systemd are usually ultra nerds without arguments real people would consider important.

        • intensely_human ( intensely_human@lemm.ee ) Banned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          I remember in my coding class when the prof claimed the language we were learning didn’t have GOTO, but it also didn’t need it because anything that could be accomplished with GOTO could be accomplished with loops and conditionals.

          Now looking back I can’t believe what a tech debt nightmare goto is, and I’m glad I weaned off it.

          Startup scripts seem more powerful because they’re code you know will be executed sequentially. For a developer that feels nice.

          But a declarative system like systemd is so much more predictable and stable, specifically because it does NOT allow for sequential execution of code.

          Once I made that switch I was a fan. It’s so much more predictable and standardized.

          • Helix 🧬 ( Helix@feddit.de ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 years ago

            Exactly my sentiment. Why would you want something with more moving parts than systemd which is also slower? :D

            There are some good alternatives to SysV init.d scripts nowadays which only came to fruition after systemd existed and people noticed it’s possible to write something like this.

            I used OpenRC and s6 and both of them worked better and were easier to configure than SysV init.

    • I agree. Coming from the Windows world, systemd felt quite familiar compared to other components in a typical linux system, I always liked it. It doesn’t really follow the unix philosophy though, so it gets a lot of hate.

    • Was a little bit of a hassle initially to convert various custom init scripts into systemd unit files, but it was worth it IMO. Now the init scripts feel kinda jank in comparison lol.

      On a barebones or embedded system I can see a lightweight init having a very big appeal though

    • I used Linux (and some Unix) before systemd was a thing and init scripts are jank. So much boilerplate and that was before things like proper isolation existed and other more modern features.

      I don’t understand why anyone would want that back.

      A replacement of systemd with something else would be fine, but please no more init scripts and pointless run levels.

    • Dandroid ( dandroid@dandroid.app ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 years ago

      For the longest time I didn’t even know what cilantro tasted like. I thought maybe it tasted like nothing to me. The reason for this was once when my wife and I were at a Mexican restaurant, I got some green salsa. I dipped my chip in and complained to my wife that it tasted like nothing. She dipped a chip in and started gagging. She said it tasted like pure liquid cilantro.

      One day I was cutting some cilantro for some tacos I was making at home, and I took a big bite. It didn’t taste like nothing to me. I just always associated the flavor with lime because anytime I have something with cilantro, I always squeeze a lime over it.

      I always thought that was mildly interesting.

    • Oh I’m quite aware, tomatoes too.

      Every little bit I eat them to see if I like them (or can force myself to) but I just haven’t been able to yet. I really wish I could just get over my dislike but I can’t seem to enjoy the taste.

      • I saw someone commenting how they specifically don’t like “raw tomatoes”. I was wondering why you’d be eating raw tomatoes to begin with but they just meant like regular tomatoes, ones you haven’t cooked since for them the cooked ones were the norm. And it had so many people agreeing with them about how “raw tomatoes” are disgusting.

        It’s a weird world out there.

          • I’d call “raw” tomatoes, as in regular eatable ones as just regular tomatoes. Raw to me sounds like unripe. While prepared, I guess that is self-explanatory. But I guess that’s more about cultural or language differences.

            What do you not like about “raw” (I guess it is now warranted since there’s ambiguity, so fair enough) tomatoes? I think they’re the tits! First time I hear the term “heirloom tomatoes” btw.

  • saigot ( saigot@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I played like 40hours of Cyberpunk 2077 before going on social media. I Thought it was going to get “mid” reviews, but I guess I got really lucky to not hit any serious bugs. Lesson being: If you wanna enjoy a game, don’t look at any marketing materials, and don’t seek out social media about it until you’ve had time to form your own opinions.

    • weew ( weew@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 years ago

      I read reviews before buying on day 2, basically. Sure, I expected some bugs, as the reviewers warned. I barely got any, just some visual glitches during cutscenes. Still, I would give the game a solid 8/10.

      Came out of my playthrough to everyone raging about everything about the game. Couldn’t even give an honest opinion about the game without being downvoted to oblivion because people who never even played the game refused to believe the game was playable at all.

      • Lith ( Lith@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        It would be one thing if people were just overhyping things, but a lot of the outrage was over how much they just blatantly lied while marketing the game. They promised a lot of specific things and then released something that was aesthetically impressive but ultimately outdone in just about every other category by sometimes decades old games, and lacked all of the groundbreaking features they marketed.

        Personally, even coming back to it much later and trying to enjoy it at face value with all of its updates, it still felt like a boring and shallow GTA clone with a neon glaze. That’s not to mention the fact that it’s still frustratingly buggy.

      • saigot ( saigot@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yeah I think the same thing is happening with starfield as well. People expected skyrim x elite dangerous x the good parts of no man’s sky and I think that just isn’t realistic. That said I find starfield pretty meh in it’s current state, I am waiting for the QOL mods to stabilize before I play much as I just ran into way too many issues.

        • mortrek ( mortrek@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          My biggest (not only) complaint so far is that entire planets have maybe 8 or 9 species of plants and animals. Hopefully biodiversity mods will pop up. It seems like a decent platform to build future content into.

    • Same. I played it on stadia and it was pretty stable. When I went to that other site to see what people were saying I was absolutely shocked at the amount of bugs and hate it was getting.

    • I borrowed it from a library for a PS4. It was genuinely unplayable if you actually wanted to play it, but for laughing at the bugs and whatnot it was great.

      Would’ve been pissed if I had paid anything for it.

    • Nath ( Nath@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      The original Rick roll was not a happy YouTube video link. It was a JavaScript bomb that you couldn’t get out of. Some people knew how to terminate their browser process, most people had to reboot.

    • I just don’t get it. Having a relationship with one person is hard work (anyone that says otherwise is either very lucky or their partner is making all the effort). Why on earth would you want to make your life even more difficult?

      • Tbh, my wife and I have been together for so long and through so much that is has become easy. We’ve been together more than fifteen years, and both of us consider our childhoods of abuse to be the hardest periods of our lives. We know and trust each other deeply and implicitly. She’s had an increasingly serious second partner for more than five years now, and it’s become pretty easy. I’m casually looking for a boyfriend, and she’s excited for me. It’s the foundational strength of our relationship that makes this lifestyle possible. We’ve built a big, full life together, and we have enough love and space in our lives to share <3

    • This is so strange to me. Not the polyamory, the weird hate of it. I’m in a monogamous relationship and polyamory just doesn’t appeal to me. But I don’t really give a shit about what other people do or who they fuck as long as it’s consentual.

    • No hate from me but two is almost too many people for me. I love my SO, I just have a really hard time being around anyone for any length of time. Different strokes for different folks.

    • intensely_human ( intensely_human@lemm.ee ) Banned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Here I am surprised that a person is surprised that non-preferred sexual acts would trigger visceral disgust.

      I mean, sex is actively disgusting unless your partner just happens to have the right combination of signals to transform it into something non-disgusting.

      The wonder is that any sex ever is seen as non-disgusting.

      • The wonder is that any sex ever is seen as non-disgusting.

        Well that’s what sexual arousal is: that state of being temporarily attracted to that which is repulsive. There’s an evolutionary reason to feel like sharing germs is disgusting, but also selective pressure to come together and do just that (to procreate). So we evolved this impulse to want to do what’s disgusting when we’re horny. But the bell curve of what is disgusting for us varies by person and cultural influences.

      • 5714 ( 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Polyamory is not group sex.

        Actually, if you don’t take care of yourself in polyamorous relationships, you might have less sex than in monoamorous relationships.

        Also, no, consensual sex is not disgusting. You might not want it, but then sex is not consensual. Bodies are not inherently disgusting.

        • ehhh bodies are pretty gross. teeth in places mashin up stuff, grimy bacteria in all the folds and crevasses, stinky sweaty fluids and excretions, there’s tons of stuff in the human body that is either conceptually quite horrifying or that we are downright neurologically programmed to be disgusted by. the eroticism of it all really just allows us to look past the disgust and see desire, joy, pleasure. that’s the subjective element.

          that dude was dumb for thinking polyamory is a sex act though lol

    • I’ve not met many poly groups but my experience was strained. First time meeting these people and the only thing they spoke about was them being poly and how much sex they were having. It was a bit odd for a first meeting with strangers. Not usual dinner conversation I felt.

    • Rin ( Rinna@lemm.ee ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      As an artist I think it’s a more complicated issue than a lot of people are making it out to be, and all the fearmongering some popular artists are promoting really doesn’t help.

    • DokPsy ( DokPsy@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 years ago

      I don’t mind the tool itself if you use it as such. I do mind when people use its output as the final product. See: the lawyer who used chatgpt for a legal brief

    • SpaceCowboy ( SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ) Banned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      LLM is way overhyped. So if your boss bought into that hype you’re gonna have a certain amount of animosity towards it. I’m a developer and it can be helpful at times, but managers seem to think it can write software on its own.

      It’s basically an iterative improvement over a search engine, but unlike a search engine it cuts off the people creating the content it’s scraping from any kind of revenue stream.

      And yeah there’s some real problems with it stealing content. Which isn’t being addressed at all. And bringing up these issues tend to get treated like Luddites by those that have bought into the hype.

    • Kalash ( theKalash@feddit.ch ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      It’s not that I hate it, but like, chatGPT sucks.

      There was this uber hype around it, then we started using it … and it just makes so many errors, it’s literally just generating more work. Scrapped it after less than a week. It’s modern snakeoil.

      • Mojo ( totallymojo@ttrpg.network ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        What! I have the opposite experience.
        Im a tabletop roleplaying gamemaster and it has helped me immensely with translations, formatting of text, compiling and keeping track of my players character backgrounds and even coming up with plots and scenes that are suited for each player.

    • 30p87 ( 30p87@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 years ago

      Wait it’s also proprietary in addition to being slower, more annoying and much more intrusive than Flatpaks let alone just native packages? That not only makes it heavily obsolete but is even more against the whole point of Linux than Windows’ winget (if the open source community repo is used instead of msstore), as snap is hardcoded to use the closed Servers from Canonical. That’s just bad on another level honestly.

    • megane-kun ( megane_kun@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Huh?! I’ve only discovered transition lenses a handful of years ago, but once I tried them, I’ve never looked back. I used to have a problem with glare and too much sunlight when out and about. I can’t wear sunglasses either (since I already wear prescription eyeglasses), and thus transition lenses were a great help.

        • megane-kun ( megane_kun@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Hmm, I haven’t really explored that option. I used to wear contact lenses though, and used them with sunglasses. But I found wearing contact lenses kinda finicky, so I gave up on them. I’ve also heard of those clip-on sunglasses, but along with prescription sunglasses, I find the idea of bringing an extra pair of glasses to be annoying. But then again, I could probably just put them in my bag and forget about them until they’re needed.

          But yeah, I’m pretty much happy with my transition lenses that every glasses I’ve had ever since my optician recommended them to me were all transitions. I’m just wondering why they’ve got such hate from others.