• I hate how when there is any picture of Soviet blocks it’s always shot in autumn or winter when it’s overcast. I live in an ex Soviet country and when these bad boys are maintained they can outperform new apartments, be it in functionality, amenities or price.

  • The USSR didn’t do much good but those apartment buildings are definitely good. I used to live in a soviet apartment building and the funny thing about that was that every wall was a load bearing wall since all of them could hold up everything. They were thick as hell and fully concrete.

  •  BarqsHasBite   ( @someguy3@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I don’t get people that have such a visceral reaction to apartments (the horror). What they write is frankly hilarious how they think. Right up there with what they write about transit (ohhh noooo) and electric stoves [sobbing noises].

    •  masterspace   ( @masterspace@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      There’s a pretty big spectrum though. On the one hand you have people in suburbs or in-city suburbs complaining about not building the occasional apartment building, essentially because they’re scared of poor people, but then on the other hand you have people living in dense desirable mid sized cities watching them get manhattanized and have their relatively dense yet still pleasant row houses get torn to build rows of ugly skyscrapers that block sunlight from even reaching street level.

      The shift of housing from being predominantly individually owned to being parts of major buildings has also come along with the corporatization of real estate, where individuals have less choice, less freedom, and are in many many cases, are being actively exploited by for profit landlords and real estate developers.

      Yes, we need to density and build more apartments but people on the left these days who I normally agree with are so laser focused on building housing at all costs that they don’t even realize that they’re racing to the bottom. By today’s standards Jane Jacobs, basically the founder of the entire modern urbanism movement, would be a NIMBY just because she advocated for making sure that cities remain livable rather than just building at all costs.

      Let’s build way more low and mid rise apartment buildings, and let’s build way more transit so that cities other than just the major ones are livable without a car, let’s ban airbnb, and let’s severely tax real estate and landlord profits to prevent them from hoarding supply. And yeah we’re gonna have to build some high rises, but let’s not pretend like replacing all of our individual housing with towers is universally a great thing.

      •  BarqsHasBite   ( @someguy3@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You’re showing exactly what I said.

        apartment building, essentially because they’re scared of poor people

        Fake association that people in apartments are poor. Don’t know if you hold that idea, but you’re repeating it

        ugly skyscrapers

        You’ve now defined them as ugly and thus undesirable.

        individuals have less choice, less freedom

        Now you say apartments are against freeeeeddooomm lol.

        actively exploited

        As if you can’t own a condo.

        Or if we increase apartments builds then there will be actual competition. Instead of the current scarcity. Basic supply and demand.

        building housing at all costs

        Not like we have a mf housing crisis. Noooo.

        making sure that cities remain livable rather than just building at all costs.

        Now you suggest that building apartments makes things unlivable! The very place people live is somehow unlivable. Or that apartments inherently make the surrounding area undesirable.

        Yeah. Visceral reaction to apartments. Peace.

        •  masterspace   ( @masterspace@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          On the one hand you have people in suburbs or in-city suburbs complaining about not building the occasional apartment building, essentially because they’re scared of poor people,

          Fake association that people in apartments are poor. Don’t know if you hold that idea, but you’re repeating it

          It’s pretty obvious I don’t, and if you think accurately describing the misguided motivations of people counts as repeating propaganda, then you must live in a pretty thick bubble.

          You’ve now defined them as ugly and thus undesirable.

          They are.

          As if you can’t own a condo.

          You have to buy the condo from a corporation, you have to pay condo fees to a condo board that is out of your control, and much of the quality of your home is determined by the original corporation that built it, as well as that board that you have no real control over and typically pays out maintenance, repairs, upgrades, etc. to other corporations.

          Or if we increase apartments builds then there will be actual competition. Instead of the current scarcity. Basic supply and demand.

          I advocated for increasing apartment builds. I also advocated for numerous other measures to increase rental supply, I just didn’t advocate for blindly buying the developer propaganda and letting them build high rise after high rise.

          Not like we have a mf housing crisis. Noooo.

          So since we have a food supply crisis we should all stop cooking and hand over all food control to corporations that will sell us back bland nutrition paste?

          Now you suggest that building apartments makes things unlivable! The very place people live is somehow unlivable. Or that apartments inherently make the surrounding area undesirable.

          They literally do. Go live in Manhattan, it sucks. Sunlight literally doesn’t hit street level except for at noon because you’ve put a bunch of gargantuan towers everywhere. Go look at a complex like Habitat 67 that actually tried to make apartments pleasant to live in instead of just being the cheapest they can possibly be to maximize developer profit. Go look at the size of Walmart parking lots in small towns that are the size of entire Manhattan blocks. Yes we need to densify, no we don’t need to necessarily build blindly and continue just letting the free market decide what gets built where.

          Yeah. Visceral reaction to apartments. Peace.

          Yeah, not having a visceral reaction to anything, just plainly stating their benefits and downsides, though you seem to be having a visceral reaction to any perceived criticism of apartments whatsoever.

  • I understand the point. But France has done this and ended up with giant ghettos filled with si much crime that no emergency services whatsoever go there anymore.

    In the US, they built giant housing projects like this where poverty was concentrated and the same thing happened. Crime installed itself in those projects and these neighbourhoods became dangerous ghettos.

    Picture 1 is not the solution you think you want.

    The condo building where I live is not so big. And it was built with 25% dedicated to social housing where poor families and underpaid workers can live comfortably in an apartment unit as big as my condo unit, which I paid nearly $400k CAD, for the price of about $650 CAD per month. This allows them to integrate with everyone else and live with everyone else and near where all the jobs are.

    •  Blackmist   ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 months ago

      I don’t think “progressives” have any issue with housing the homeless. The issue is where.

      Go to a conservative (or indeed any) neighbourhood and tell them you’ll be building 200 apartments nearby to house rough sleepers, see how that goes down.

      Most homeless are invisible to us anyway. They hold down jobs, they have gym memberships, they just sleep in their car, or on a mate’s sofa every so often. Nobody would have a problem with them moving in nearby.

      It’s the aggressive beggars, addicts, and shitting in shop doorways (and these three are the same person) that nobody wants anywhere near them. These are who most people think of when they hear the word “homeless”. Most of them need more treatment than just a roof. We don’t have enough of that either.

      I’ve no issue with my taxes helping all these people. I’m happy to pay tax to reduce the chances of me personally being robbed by somebody in desperate poverty.

      • I think fears about the homeless robbing you are massively overblown. I’ve been panhandled hundreds of times, and the worst response I’ve ever gotten is a dirty look.

        I also think that the people shitting on public, etc. are more likely to be mentally ill than addicted (although they could be both). The reason is that Drugs Are Really Expensive. Also, I’m not aware of any addiction that causes you to shit in public, but it’s easy to find mental illnesses that would.

        •  Blackmist   ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          What causes the homeless to shit in public is that we barely have any public toilets. And the ones we do have are locked overnight, because we’re terrified that gays will have sex in them.

    • The left leaning rich progressives are all hypocrites when it comes to investing, money, housing, tech, jobs, waste, emissions, and more.

      Who knew the people who have the most to gain from capitalism would be so willing to also suck the dick of it for their own personal gain. Imagine that.

  • What a stupid snivelling American sophomoric bullshit opinion.

    The bottom problem is drug addiction, not capitalism.

    The top photo isn’t about what it’s like to fucking look at , it’s about what it’s like to live in.

    And I can tell you that there is plenty of crime there.

    •  Grayox   ( @Grayox@lemmy.ml ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      What a stupid sniveling fascist freshman bullshit opinion

      Material Conditions lead them to that drug abuse

      Capitalism made those material conditions literally unavoidable

      Crime is easier to deal with when you live inside of four walls with a roof and a locking door as opposed to a motherfucking tent.

      I know you dont give a fuck, but your arguments are DUMBBB. Are you being purposely disingenuous or are you just stupid?

      • Material Conditions lead them to that drug abuse

        This is how I know you have exactly zero life experience, and clearly never given the topic more than a moments thought.

        You call me dumb - but are you seriously saying that the only reason people become substance abusers is because of poverty?

        Think about that for just thirty seconds.

      • Where living in such apartments would be hell because they’d expect them to be built out of sticks and cardboard, as it is common in the USA. Someone sneezes in the south end on the 2nd floor, the guy on the 12th floor north end goes bless you.

        Buildings in Europe are built from proper building materials, concrete, steel, glass, and bricks. Not cardboard and sticks and paper. Hence living in them is actually much nicer than one used to US buildings would expect.