Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
GonzoKnows ( gonzoknowsdotcom1@monero.town )  to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years ago

Introducing Proton CAPTCHA | Proton

proton.me

external-link
message-square
30
link
fedilink
212
external-link

Introducing Proton CAPTCHA | Proton

proton.me

GonzoKnows ( gonzoknowsdotcom1@monero.town )  to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
30
link
fedilink
We developed our own CAPTCHA service to ensure it is secure, respects privacy, and optimized to be usable by everyone. Find out how it works.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Sylocule ( Sylocule@lemmy.one ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    3 years ago

    The EU has released an open source CAPTCHA solution

    https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/news/eu-captcha-under-eupl-12

    • QuazarOmega ( QuazarOmega@lemy.lol ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 years ago

      So there is one, very nice!

      • XpeeN ( XpeeN@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 years ago

        Heard about mCaptcha too

        • pedroapero ( pedroapero@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 years ago

          Not sure why they used sha256 though, it mostly defeats the goal of protecting from bots (those can get access to ASICs, as oposed to regular users).

  • ono ( ono@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Other than making the web tedious to use, my biggest CAPTCHA complaint is that it puts the main providers in a position to monitor everyone’s web use. The blog post doesn’t address that, but it does say this:

    No third-party services

    Perhaps they mean it’s self-hosted? That would be very welcome. It might require open source code to catch on, since many site owners are uncomfortable running mystery code on our servers. That would be very welcome, too.

    Here’s hoping it’s good.

  • 👁️👄👁️ ( mojo@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 years ago

    New captcha designs should require you to beat a dark souls boss

    • atreus ( atreus@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 years ago

      Next one will be to 100% every Assassins Creed game.

  • Sha'ul ( Shaul@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    Proton is trying to do too many things and can’t excel at doing one thing. It’s getting too big beyond its capabilities which means services are going to suffer at a lower quality.

    If the want blanket trust from users, remove the VPN login to make it anonymous and change the VPN code to remove all anti-features and comply with native F-Droid, other RiseUpVPN is the only choice for everybody to use.

    • 🌞🌞🌞 ( amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 years ago

      Lmao if you’re reading this, do not use RiseUp VPN.

      • ReversalHatchery ( ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        What’s the problem with riseup? I’ve also read some other comments below, but their confusing wording does not help…

    • 1chemistdown ( 1chemistdown@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 years ago

      Sure, push a known malware free vpn service while bashing a service that is very well known and respected.

      • merrick ( merrick@normalcity.life ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 years ago

        Source for Riseup having known malware?

      • speck ( speck@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 years ago

        I have to admit that I don’t know enough about any of this to be sure I’m reading in the right way. Is it “known malware, free VPN” or “known malware-free VPN”?

      • Sha'ul ( Shaul@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        You found malware in the source code for RiseUpVPN? The source code is publicly accessible, what kind of malware is in it?

      • QuazarOmega ( QuazarOmega@lemy.lol ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        It’s one of the most transparent services, there’s this neat video examining the available free VPNs by Techlore that was coincidentally made very recently: peertube/piped

    • ExpensiveConstant ( ExpensiveConstant@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      What “Anti-features” does proton VPN have?

      • Sha'ul ( Shaul@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Accoding to F-Droid build service, it says ProtonVPN depends entirely on non-free network services, which means:

        “This Anti-Feature is applied to apps that promote or depend entirely on a Non-Free network service which is impossible, or not easy to replace. Replacement requires changes to the app or service. This antifeature would not apply, if there is a simple configuration option that allows pointing the app to a running instance of an alternative, publicly available, self-hostable, free software server solution.”

        Compared to RiseUpVPN source code which has zero anti-features

  • squid ( squid@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I often won’t touch websites with captcha as its used to train ai for google so if I see open source captcha solutions of which I doubt I will see as often as id like as googles strong hold

    But proton keep up the good work

    • smollittlefrog ( smollittlefrog@lemdro.id ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      hCaptcha is catching on pretty quickly.

      • QuazarOmega ( QuazarOmega@lemy.lol ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        That’s still proprietary, so you’ll just be feeding someone else’s systems no?

        • smollittlefrog ( smollittlefrog@lemdro.id ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah I’m not saying hCaptcha is good. It just shows that new captcha systems can become popular, and that Google’s hold isn’t as strong as it may seem.

          • QuazarOmega ( QuazarOmega@lemy.lol ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Oh yeah, that’s true

  • smollittlefrog ( smollittlefrog@lemdro.id ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    No third-party services

    Support for alternative routing

    (following link)

    alternative routing requires us to use third-party infrastructure and networks we do not control

    huh

    • Dark Arc ( Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      That just means they’re using other servers to route traffic. It doesn’t mean those servers are third party services.

  • Zerush ( Zerush@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    Nice, but captchas are never a good measure to avoid bots, only to annoying users, apart from spying them, if it is from Google. Long before AI, bots could solve captchas better than humans. It is a clearly obsolete method. Apart the system used by Proton is impossible for blind users, Google captcha at least had an auditive captcha too.

    • xuniL ( xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • Zerush ( Zerush@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        This is the problem. I remember a very simple method to avoid spambots on a forum with great success. It is based on the following idea: A spambot or even a spammer necessarily uses a disposable email to register. These emails are usually not valid for more than 10-30 minutes, just to be able to receive the confirmation link. In this forum, the sending of the confirmation email has been delayed for half an hour due to this and with this the spam problems have ended. A normal user, if they really want to sign up, waits this time without problems. Then the usual 50 messages before being able to put a link as an additional measure. Simple and without third party apps.

  • kraniax ( kraniax@lemmy.wtf ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    everyday I have more reasons to not trust Proton

  • OsrsNeedsF2P ( OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s a pretty cool idea. The more you fail, the more POW is applied.

  • MonkderZweite ( MonkderZweite@feddit.ch ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Cool! But i still hate Captcha!

  • FREE_TO_SAIL ( FREE_TO_SAIL@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    FUCK ALL CAPTCHA i want to develop a program not to solve captcha but to actually break them then when they go down bypass them some how some way one day i swear i will

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 42 users / day
  • 557 users / week
  • 2.72K users / month
  • 6.69K users / 6 months
  • 852 local subscribers
  • 51.3K subscribers
  • 4.56K Posts
  • 59.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t ( k_o_t@lemmy.ml ) 
  • tmpod ( tmpod@lemmy.pt ) 
  • Yayannick ( Yayannick@lemmy.ml ) 
  • ranok ( ranok@sopuli.xyz ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code