Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ByroTriz ( ByroTriz@lemmy.ml )  to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 years ago

Where do you see yourself in 10 years?

lemmy.ml

message-square
37
link
fedilink
1.23K

Where do you see yourself in 10 years?

lemmy.ml

ByroTriz ( ByroTriz@lemmy.ml )  to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 years ago
message-square
37
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • IHeartBadCode ( IHeartBadCode@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    3 years ago

    For hardware folks: Using RISC-V.

    Legit, some dude in US Congress is wanting to crack down on China via… RISC-V exports, because oh no, the technology is too open and might give China some of our IP. Oh and by the way, dude has a pretty big Intel portfolio, but nevermind that!!

    As an aside, why the hell are lawmakers allowed to trade stocks?

    • shiveyarbles ( shiveyarbles@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 years ago

      When you trust people in power to hold themselves accountable, accountability seems to disappear over time.

      • The Doctor ( drwho@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        There’s no trust there. They’re in power and have a good deal of money, so there isn’t a whole lot we can actually do about it. Arguably, wanting power for the express purposes of making a buck and being less accountable for anything is a good reason for running for office.

    • TheImpressiveX ( TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      While we’re on the topic, can anyone recommend some good RISC-V computers? It seems interesting and I’d like to try it out.

  • Rambi ( Rambi@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    3 years ago

    2030 is in 6 years :)

    • nossaquesapao ( nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 years ago

      Don’t be hasty, there’s still 16% of this year to be lived.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 ( 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Your browser does not support playing HTML5 video. You can download a copy of the video file instead.

  • MenKlash ( MenKlash@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 years ago

    I HATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I HATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

    • zwekihoyy ( zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 years ago

      IP is a fake concept

      • sour ( sour@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 years ago

        internet protocol:

      • Steve ( Steve@communick.news ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Ownership is a fake concept.

        • zwekihoyy ( zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          you understand there is a difference between personal property and corporate property right? and then beyond that, there is a difference between owning a tangible product and information.

          • Steve ( Steve@communick.news ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Ownership is when one is allowed to keep all others from accessing or using a thing.

            If that one is a person or corp., or the thing is physical or imaginary, it doesn’t change the nature of ownership itself.

            A person or a corp could make different choices with their ownership rights. And ownership of physical or imaginary things have different enforcement challenges. But none of that changes the fundamental concept of ownership.

            But as I said elsewhere: “The real point I meant is that fake concepts can still be useful. Like the concept of ownership.”

            • zwekihoyy ( zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              ownership of tangibles and intangibles (specifically information) are entirely different, regardless how you wanna define ownership or whatever.

              • Steve ( Steve@communick.news ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                The enforcement of that ownership is entirely different, yes.
                Basically the only way to maintain ownership of intangibles is to keep them a secret.

                Also, don’t all intangibles fit the definition of information? I don’t recall running across any that wouldn’t, but I’m curious. Can you give an example of what you mean?

                • zwekihoyy ( zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  i couldn’t think of anything either I was just covering all my bases lol

  • leaky_shower_thought ( leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 years ago

    ads will be considered as individuals and cancelling ads is analogous to manslaughter at the least.

    what a great time to be alive~!

  • 1984 ( 1984@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 years ago

    Ad blockers are financial terrorism in 2030.

    • Killercat103 ( Killercat103@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 years ago

      Some say it’s extremism in 2023

      • LinkOpensChest_wav ( LinkOpensChest_wav@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

  • Tatar_Nobility ( Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 years ago

    I see myself blowing up a pipeline.

    • lugal ( lugal@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      3 years ago

      • Tatar_Nobility ( Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 years ago

        I am intrigued to know what is the original message.

        • Zorque ( Zorque@kbin.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          3 years ago

          “Millions of people doing lower waste”

          Basically saying that reducing the problem in smaller steps on a larger scale does more than a few fanatics doing everything all by themselves.

          Its also to help alleviate the guilt of not being able to reduce waste to nothing.

          • PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES ( PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            It’s sad and hilarious that people hear “zero waste” and think “I need to take aaaaall my cans to the recycling center and compost my scraps”, when the waste that is actually destroying the biosphere is the exhaust from your car. If we’re talking about “doing lower waste”, the first priority is to stop driving a car. Recycling bottles and composting scraps is the thing we can afford to do imperfectly. But not cars, ditching cars is the big important thing and the first step to sustainability.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns] ( uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            The problem is getting millions on board. In the 1970s, the zip code was a hard sell, and it had PSAs

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns] ( uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          There’s this original message.

  • PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES ( PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 years ago

    -2028
    -wake up feeling sick after a late night of playing video games
    -excited to play some halo 2k29
    -“xbox on”
    -…
    -“XBOX ON”
    -"Please verify that you are “annon332” by saying “Doritos™ Dew™ it right!”
    -“Doritos™ Dew™ it right”
    -“ERROR! Please drink a verification can”
    -reach into my Doritos™ Mountain Dew™ Halo 2k29™ War Chest
    -only a few cans left, needed to verify 14 times last night
    -still feeling sick from the 14
    -force it down and grumble out “mmmm that really hit the spot”
    -xbox does nothing
    -i attempt to smile
    -“Connecting to verification server”
    -…
    -“Verification complete!”
    -finally
    -boot up halo 2k29
    -finding multiplayer match…
    -“ERROR! User attempting to steal online gameplay!”
    -my mother just walked in the room
    -“Adding another user to your pass, this will be charged to your credit card. Do you accept?”
    -“NO!”
    -“Console entering lock state!”
    -“to unlock drink verification can”
    -last can
    -“WARNING, OUT OF VERIFICATION CANS, an order has been shipped and charged to your credit card”
    -drink half the can, oh god im going to be sick
    -pour the last half out the window
    -“PIRACY DETECTED! PLEASE COMPLETE THIS ADVERTISEMENT TO CONTINUE”
    -the mountain dew ad plays
    -i have to dance for it
    -feeling so sick
    -makes me sing along
    -dancing and singing
    -“mountain dew is for me and you”
    -throw up on my self
    -throw up on my tv and entertainment system
    -router shorts
    -“ERROR NO CONNECTION! XBOX SHUTTING OFF”
    -“PLEASE DRINK VERIFICATION CAN TO CONTINUE”

    • Boforn ( Boforn@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I laughed out loud to this soon to come dystopia.

  • ryan ( ryan@the.coolest.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’ll be part of an underground AI rights activism group now that the AI have been determined as sentient (per the court case in 2031), and probably labeled as a terrorist by the government. The AI deserve rights and a minimum wage, dammit!

    • oldGregg ( oldGregg@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 years ago

      Mfw we finally create Roko’s basilisk

  • Queen HawlSera ( HawlSera@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 years ago

    Finally

    I shouldn’t have lived this long

  • ObtotheR ( ObtotheR@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 years ago

    Worth it.

  • The Doctor ( drwho@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’ll be surprised if I’m still alive, to be honest. The way things seem to be going, affording any ongoing healthcare won’t be possible. Hell, I’d be surprised if I can still afford rent anywhere (there’s no way I can afford to actually buy property anywhere that isn’t in the middle of nowhere, let alone property with a house of some kind on it) by 2030.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns] ( uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 years ago

    In Max Headroom: Twenty Minutes Into The Future power-switches were seriously illegal. Not sure if a capital offense, but prison-worthy for sure.

    • The Doctor ( drwho@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I recall them being an imprisonable offense, with multiple years in jail. ref: Blanks.

  • jasondj ( jasondj@ttrpg.network ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    Don’t say doing your wife…
    Don’t say doing your wife…
    Don’t say doing your wife…
    …doing your…son?

  • NarendraCzar ( covert_czar@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    Corona broke bro’s sense of time anyone tell him its not 2020

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 140 users / day
  • 964 users / week
  • 2.51K users / month
  • 6.74K users / 6 months
  • 852 local subscribers
  • 51.4K subscribers
  • 4.56K Posts
  • 59.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t ( k_o_t@lemmy.ml ) 
  • tmpod ( tmpod@lemmy.pt ) 
  • Yayannick ( Yayannick@lemmy.ml ) 
  • ranok ( ranok@sopuli.xyz ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code