OneMeaningManyNames ( whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml ) to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoSo much for Blockchain's real life use caseslemmy.mlimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1286
arrow-up1286imageSo much for Blockchain's real life use caseslemmy.mlOneMeaningManyNames ( whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml ) to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square55linkfedilink
minus-square_MusicJunkie ( _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoFor each project there is one authoritative instance, one “server” that everyone pushes to. Otherwise you get chaos.
minus-squareAsyx ( Asyx@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years agoThat’s not a git thing though. You can totally have multiple remotes and the remotes are just git repositories themselves. Git is 100% decentralized. There is technically nothing stopping you from having multiple remotes.
minus-squareperishthethought ( perishthethought@lemm.ee ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoThat may be how you use it, but that’s not baked into git. See my previous response. There’s a bunch of FUD in this thread for some reason.
minus-squareThann ( Thann@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoPeople want simple answers, and “blockchain bad” seems to satisfy many
minus-squareTja ( Tja@programming.dev ) linkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoOtherwise you get git. You’re describing svn.
minus-squareThann ( Thann@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoAnd nobody ever forked a project, and lived happily ever after, then end.
minus-square_MusicJunkie ( _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoIf you want to work with the original project, you have to push to the server that controls the original project.
minus-squareThann ( Thann@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoNo you don’t, you can just fork it, add a commit, and walk away, and everyone can decide which one they want to clone
For each project there is one authoritative instance, one “server” that everyone pushes to. Otherwise you get chaos.
That’s not a git thing though. You can totally have multiple remotes and the remotes are just git repositories themselves. Git is 100% decentralized. There is technically nothing stopping you from having multiple remotes.
That may be how you use it, but that’s not baked into git. See my previous response. There’s a bunch of FUD in this thread for some reason.
People want simple answers, and “blockchain bad” seems to satisfy many
Otherwise you get git. You’re describing svn.
And nobody ever forked a project, and lived happily ever after, then end.
If you want to work with the original project, you have to push to the server that controls the original project.
No you don’t, you can just fork it, add a commit, and walk away, and everyone can decide which one they want to clone