• There is no stance that Mullvad can take on this in order to make me want to stay with them, since this is not an abstract, philosophical matter. It’s simple: Daniel partially owns a pro profit company. I pay Daniel’s company some money. Daniel reaps - as he should - parts of the company’s revenue as wage (which is my money). Daniel uses that wage to fund whatever the hell he wants - as he should - with my money. I’m either fine with contributing to this or not. Period. I am not fine with it, so I’m flirting with IVPN.

    • ramble81 ( ramble81@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thought experiment time…

      part of the company’s revenue as wage

      How far down the chain does that count for you? If there was a VP, Manager, or Individual Contributor that took their (personal) wages and donated to a cause you didn’t like, would you still pull your money?

      • Good question! I guess it does matter that he’s a cofounder and CEO. I honestly don’t know how I would react if we were talking about an employee instead. I’d deliberate and make up my mind there and then. Which sheds light on the fact that the matter isn’t as black and white as my comment made it sound.

        Possibly off topic:

        I work within the criminal justice system and I believe cops are pigs, while I know for a fact that there are good people on the force too. I wouldn’t give up my current position just because another “lowly” employee is rotten.

        • Random Dent ( CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s also the scale of the donation for me. He didn’t just make a donation the way you or I probably would - his donation accounted for 72% of the party’s entire income for 2025. So the money that Mullvad makes is now tied to the continued existence of the party, albeit indirectly.

        • ramble81 ( ramble81@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          It was something I didn’t have a good answer for either. I think ownership is a good criteria but then I was trying to figure out why it was to me. Since it’s passed to an individual, via salary, is it still “my money”?

          Amount could have something to do, but it’s possible for a highly paid IC to donate quite a bit.

          The one that is cut-and-dry for me is something like Chic-Fil-A. My money is going directly to their foundation, which is used against LGBTQ people, so that’s an immediate hard no.

          • chris ( chris@links.openriver.net ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            He is providing that political party with over half of its income if I recall correctly.

            If Mullvad’s janitor were someone doing that and Mullvad refused to terminate them, I’d quit Mullvad.

            • Just to make sure I understand, you do support employer discrimination against employees, just only for the political beliefs you find offensive. Do I understand that correctly? While I believe the only good nazi is a dead one, I alao believe the systems we set up generate the crap we have to deal with later.

              • chris ( chris@links.openriver.net ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s Karl Popper’s tolerance paradox. To answer your question, yes I am in support of discrimination against anyone using their salary to fund over half the annual budget of a white nationalist political party.

              • ZeroHora ( ZeroHora@lemmy.ml ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                In any sane country a “national socialist” aka nazi party is illegal, an employee funding a party like that are committing a crime so any morality bullshit about freeze peach is beyond that.

  • katy ✨ ( cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 months ago

    even if you do believe in freedom of expression and information, why would you donate to a fascist group which have been using suppression of expression - either it is attacking immigrants, pushing age gate laws, or attacking trans rights - as their path to power?

  • sp3ctre ( sp3ctre@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have no problem, if the service gets used for things I don’t agree with (I will not know anyway). But I do have a problem when one of the founders I paid (with the money from my subscription) openly supports this kind of party. No hard feelings, but with that knowledge, I prefer to give my money to another VPN.

    Got my refund from Mullvad so I’m fine now.

    • eremophila ( eremophila@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Time will tell, the industry is based on paid ‘reviews’, and manipulation. There is little reason for any of them to pretend to be ethical, the biggest companies definitely aren’t. Mullvad are likely to feel this though, since they most likely have a more ethical user base than the competition. Airvpn and ivpn are no doubt gaining new customers.

      • My point was that their user base is more technologically adept than other businesses, and therefore it matters more for them. Also their selling point is that you “trust” them not to give your info away, and anything that makes them seem untrustworthy is bound to hurt their business. So they’re not really comparable to regular businesses when it comes to that.

  • Most predictable response ever. Some shite about the free market of ideas and some other shite about the need to engage with “ideas you personally dislike”.

    In other words, we should give fascists a seat at the table and hope we can debate them away. Been there done that, doesn’t work.

    I don’t expect a company to just condemn fascism completely unprompted. But in a situation like this, if you can’t even commit to taking action to ensure that a fascist party does not receive any of your funding again, then your mission isn’t worth shit.

    I’m sure that the people who would be forcibly “remigrated” by this particular political party would not feel very free from authority and surveillance.

  • Dave8008 ( Dave8008@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have had a Mullvad account for many years. I now have an iVPN acc. It’s a very simple choice for me. If Mullvad’s success results in funding far right racists then I don’t care to assist that happening

    • carg ( omxxi@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Interesting reading to try to get into the mind of a left thinker voting extreme right. Although I didn’t share such opinion, his argument sounds like “I don’t trust/like my government, so, let’s support Hitler to do some opposition with the hope that he won’t be too powerful to enforce his policies what I don’t share”. Historically that doesn’t end well and it sounds really naive.

  • spizzat2 ( spizzat2@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Self-censorship out of fear is an even bigger dampener than direct censorship.

    Man, I hate having to think about the effects of my actions before I do something. It’s so much better to just do things, and then see if there are consequences.

    /s

  • iByteABit ( iByteABit@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    We have nurtured a culture of radical tolerance. Even when some in our sphere of collaborators have advocated for actors and views that have personally and severely affected the founders and their family members, this has not stood in the way of cooperation.

    The leopards that ate other people’s faces will definitely not eat my face too