• PotatoPie ( PotatoPie@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it has nothing to do with the reasons they give, they just want to push western narratives of “righteousness”

      I’ve been to political rooms in blahaj before and the discussed politics always boil down to anti-conservatism and anti-russian/chinese imperialism,

      US imperialism? You’ll be called a tankie and told to stop acting like one to fit in

      Israel genocide? You’re regressing the progressiveness of empowering jews, stop being overly antisemitic and using tankie sources

      Some political news africa? Turn it about weather or not they support LGBTQ rights yet

      Riots in south america? Their governments are oppressing them, also stop using tankie sources

      There’s no way they can be this biased by coincidence, i’m not a tankie and i didn’t believe it at first but it’s true, Tankie do carry the burden of always being right!

    • It’s spurned by liberal admins and mods usually. They can’t actually argue against us so they put their cognitive dissonance into an unhealthy place of self-soothing.

      This actually isn’t unique to Lemmy at all it is the default reaction of committed liberals and liberals with thin skin. But when someone feels ownership of a place and like they’re losing legitimacy and control they can lash out.

      It’s also important to understand that most people online discussing politics in these forums know basically nothing. They don’t read. They can’t critically engage with media. They don’t question their own biases when presented with people from other cultures. They certainly don’t actually do anything irl that would teach them visceral lessons. Trying to build an organization (not a career in a non-profit), a party, or even just feeding people. They might as well be 10 year olds for all the information contained in their political opinions. But they feel extremely entitled to their positions and wrap it up in their identities. If they are contradicted they feel personally attacked. If they think something despite having never investigated it, they announce it proudly with confidence and bully those who disagree. In short, humility runs counter to their socialization.

      Finally, they’re used to punching right, or at least most of them are, and their rhetoric breaks down when they are instead forced to punch left. So they just start namecalling instead, banning, or just trolling, as it allows their egos to escape without much damage.

      Luckily, we are looking at an echo chamber of people who automatically self-isolate and can’t organize anything. In the real world conversations are faster and more productive and building things and teaching is much easier, even with an audience that isn’t entirely friendly. Irl people usually can’t get away with acting like such babies.

  • davel [he/him] ( davel@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    We know that some people eventually work past their “fuck tankies” stage because we did. Most of us used to believe the same things and for the same reasons, because we grew up under largely the same conditions.

      • Been on Lemmy for almost 2 years, that instance and the people who joined it always felt “off” to me, I’m glad I recently set up a Lemmy instance of my own because that de-federate button will likely come in handy shortly.

        • The moment they openly defended keeping chasers around and sexually tokenizing trans women, I was out. Those lead to a compatibilist approach to integration via internalizing self-deprecation and worse.

          • eldavi ( eldavi@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            The moment they openly defended keeping chasers around and sexually tokenizing trans women

            barely related tangent warning:

            chasers are thing in most lgbtqia communities and it’s fascinating to me how they’re embraced in the ones i’m a member of (bears, chubs, daddies, mature) and how they’re reviled in most of the trans communities and for the same exact reasons in all circumstances.

            it makes me wonder if the way that men and women are conditioned to regard to their own sexuality has anything to do with it.

            • One thing to consider is that the people you’re describing as accepted are fundamentally already in the in group that is oppressed - gay or bi. Chasers are basically universally cis men treating trans women as a fetish object. The dehumanizing aspect is different when it is in no way self-referential and when the basic identity is what is fetishized.

              Another way to think of it is that for a group of people oppressed in their societies, one of the few ways those (cis) societies “value” trans women is as a taboo sexual fetish, often an exploitable one.

              This does relate to gender in that these societies are misogynist and treat women’s bodies as available for purchase in one way or another, plus a long ladder up to that actual act - simulation, imagery, drama, etc. The act of “acquisition” is gender biased in the extreme and coincides with the impoverished of women, and not coincidentally trans women. What is the value of a woman?

              • eldavi ( eldavi@lemmy.ml ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                The misogyny and women’s “value” are what I was referring to when I postulated that it had something to do w societal conditioning towards their own sexualities and it’s undeniable that it plays a part.

                What’s also undeniable is that some chasers also get off on the taboos like the chubby chaser encouragers objectify their partners as a taboo (chub) within a taboo (queer).

                Also: the Kinsey scale’s behavior metric automatically qualifies those male cis-gendered objectifiers as members of the LGBTQIA umbrella – whether they want to accept that themselves or not

                So then trans women chasers seem to be cut from the same cloth as many of the chasers in other queer communities. Yet the latter is still embraced in it’s respective communities the former still reviled.

                I could understand if the issue was that the trans chasers are psychologically closeted and it makes them exhibit less than desirable behavior towards their fellow queers; but the same is true for “down low” or “discreet” men and – again – not even “down low” men engender the same level of revilement that is leveraged at the trans chasers.

  • Dessalines ( dessalines@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is impossible for liberal servers to not do this every few months.

    For them, legitimacy comes from proximity to their own media, educational institutions, state-produced propaganda, and power structures. Anything that challenges their white / western supremacist outlook gets demonized with “tankie” or “communist infiltration sapping our precious bodily fluids”.

  • pH3ra ( pH3ra@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Another case of “anyone slightly more left wing than me is a tankie, anyone slightly more right wing is a fascist” while we all boil in the same real-life-gray-area soup

  • whoisearth ( whoisearth@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Got blocked from 196 for having an opinion that, although popular, did not align with the mods there so you know what? Fuck 196 and their baby mods. They’ve shown themselves to be little bitch snowflakes so let them be?

          • whoisearth ( whoisearth@lemmy.ca ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            A few things.

            1. The parallel is stupid.
            2. If you legit have a black friend you probably have more than one.
            3. I also have LGBT friends, have walked the pride parade, fought for them, etc.
            4. Opinions are like aasholes
            5. Arguing on The Internet proves both parties are removed

            I stand by what I say. The mods on 196/balajahaja or whatever the fuck it is are snowflake babies and nothing of value for me was lost but I’m more that happy to express they are snowflake babies whenever given the opportunity.

            • Nojustice ( Nojustice@lemmy.ml ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              The mods on 196/balajahaja or whatever the fuck it is are snowflake babies

              I agree with this 100%. i have not dug into whatever comment got you in hot water

              Im just stating that being around LGBTQIA people, or any minority, or even being one of these groups, doesn’t preclude you, or anyone, from homophobia/transphobia/racism. We live in a racist ass society. we are all racist. we live in a transphobic society. we are all transphobic. instead of trying to argue why you arent these things you should instead examine why someone might say what you had done or said was transphobic.

              • whoisearth ( whoisearth@lemmy.ca ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Fundamentally I disagree with blocking outside of things like threatening life, CSAM or other extreme things. Doing it for different opinions? That’s a bitch move and sign of a weak person or persons.

                You or anyone else can go through my comment history at no point have I said anything destructive to anyone. Regardless it’s neither here nor there. The mods/admins of that instance have shown they are not interested in divergent or challenging opinions. Let them live in their walled garden. For anyone on their instance I would seriously take a second look at their bullshit policies and/or questionable moderation.

                My 2 cents.

                Edit and on your point of we live in a racist/transfobic society I agree 100%. Maybe it’s an opportunity for the people doing the banning to reflect maybe they need to pull their heads out their asses and realize intentionally removing voices from a room does not make the voices go away. And adult would have asked/talked it out. Dialogue. Nope. Bitch behaviour and block lol