For some reason the repost didn’t include the original link. Here ya go: https://prensaobrera.com/english/there-is-no-way-forward-for-the-working-class-under-capitalism-we-need-revolutionary-organizations-capable-of-destroying-it

I played the first one. It was good enough up until the end when they blamed everything on the main character’s PTSD.

Historic doesn’t just mean old. We have plenty of cities with history. Tons of historic racism, colonialism, and slavery across the nation

Ah, the classic grade school, “Nuh-uh, you.” Good one to try after all else fails. How about this for clarity: This is my last response to you because you seem to be willfully obtuse. Judging by the use of therapy speak and viewpoint that it is the people wearing skirts at fault, I’d also guess you are not a safe person to be around. Please do better in the future, but I am done with you.

There is more than one reason to avoid AI developed software. We have no idea if they used a local model, or are paying one of the shit companies pushing AI into everything. We don’t know the skill level of the dev and if they have the ability to quality check the AI code. We don’t know if there are potential security vulnerabilities because of AI code (hopefully less likely in this kind of project). That is all in addition to the greater issues with AI.

The article is a little vague on the AI use in this project, and does not seem to tell the whole story. Here is the disclosure of the usage from the git project page:

"AI coding tools were used in developing and debugging this port. My focus has been on matching the original P.T.: comparing builds with PS4 references, identifying discrepancies, testing gameplay and prioritizing fixes.

The project uses the original game assets from the player’s own PS4 copy. Optional upscalers and neural rendering use machine-learning models when enabled."

Still pretty vague.

I often do because they are the only person I’ve seen use and I don’t interact with them much. Not to mention non-native readers and people with difficulty reading. I get the intent behind it, but at this point it seems like throwing a wrench into a tornado.

I only responded after you called them mentally ill. Your initial response was still a command to fix it, which is still being a jerk, but didn’t really warrant responding since it was pretty obvious that you were kinda trolling. Saying something like, “hey, your use of the thorn is obnoxious and makes it difficult for non-native readers and folks with reading disabilities” probably would have sparked a less adversarial discussion

You said they had a mental illness, which is being an ass and just not appropriate. Your replacement was not with established replacements though. You chose numbers that correspond to letters randomly. If you had done some l33t it would have correlated a bit better.

I get it, it is annoying to a lot of people. That being said, engaging and coming up with some salient points would have been a better course instead of going straight to being aggressive. People might not have been so keen to respond if that had been the case

The difference between what you did and what San does are pretty obvious. The thorn is an established character with a sound that has been associated with it for hundreds of years. Yes it is no longer used, but it is not a garbled mess of random characters like your example. It is a replacement of 2 specific letter with one character that represents the same sound they make. A little annoying? For some folks, yeah. Worthy of being a total ass about it? Absolutely not.

I am honestly blown away at the lack of understanding displayed here.

The shorts are not for onlookers, the shorts are to discourage onlookers from taking non-consensual photos/videos and selling them on the internet. The article even goes on to say it is a huge problem at the festival outside of this ride alone.

No, I’m not, and using therapy speak (even incorrectly) to try to deflect is pretty shitty. You are clearly not going to understand, and at this point it seems willful. I’m done repeating myself

They are saying the same thing you are but with less relevance since it has nothing to do with the issue at hand: people taking non-consensual photos and videos of people’s underwear at a festival and then selling them on on the internet, again without consent.

Because they did not do the thing that is wrong. The person who filmed them did. Blame that person for doing the harm, not the people who did nothing wrong. Saying they should be wearing shorts takes the focus off the perpetrator and puts the burden on the victim. Hence, victim blaming

The issue is recording someone without consent and posting it on the internet for profit, not what the women are wearing. You saying they should have worn something else is blaming the victim for the act of the person that did the actual thing that is wrong. Again, classic victim blaming. And before you say “They should have known that is what the ride does,” yes, hopefully they knew that and consented to riding it with that information. That is still not consent to be recorded without their knowledge and have it be posted on the internet.

That is literally what the article is about and is not a secondary concern. The people on the ride consented to that. They may not even have thought videos of them doing it would end up on the internet.

There is a difference to consenting to the ride and consenting to be recorded and those videos being sold. Like a huge difference.

How is non-consenual recordings that are being used on the internet for profit, again without consent, a secondary concern?

Wow, classic victim blaming. How embarrassing for you