The same is true in the US. Charging infrastructure has been getting better and better. Not perfect, and China is beating us hands down, but it is 100% doable nowadays. Aging Wheels has several great videos about EV charging on trips.
Like another commenter said, charging at businesses and homes needs to be improved. Apartments should be adding outlets next to parking spots and cities adding them on streets.
I’m in the PNW, so ideal conditions outside the house are uncommon. PETG or ABS seem better suited, but I for sure don’t have the gun expertise
Reverse experience and I am also surprised. Seems like the worst material for almost anything around a gun
I live in the US and it’s not the gun ownership that was weird to me. Beehaw has never really been a hotbed of 2A activity, so seeing something about it was weird. I don’t see an issue with this post, other than maybe wrong community. Also not sure on the rules around gun posting
I might be able to translate based on my experience in 3D printing. I do not have a guns, though, which is what this appears to be about.
Glock is a gun manufacturer. Invader v2 is probably a specific model.
Squirted seems to be a slang term for 3D printed.
PLA is the most common kind of 3D printing material/filament.
A compensator is an attachment for a gun that I believe reduces recoil, but don’t quote me on that.
Lade I think is a typo and they meant made.
The image is of said 3D printed attachment on the business end of a pistol, presumably the aforementioned Glock Invader v2.
Definitely seems out of place on Beehaw.
I’ve never heard it used that way. I see it used more like cis and trans. Just a descriptor
They could not have known you wanted no other information and that you did not want a video. All you mentioned was the battery life.
lol, saying the thing you did is not antagonistic. I don’t even think what you did was antagonist. My point was that you weren’t specific. You never said no videos, no other information. Someone gave you a thing that includes what you said you wanted, and you were like, “No, this isn’t right, and also I will have to wait for the thing that is closer to what I want but still isn’t right” It was funny. In that “How could the person who was literally trying to help have known?” kind of way.
Like, just say, “Thanks, but this isn’t what I was looking for for [these reasons]. I didn’t state them ahead of time”
No, but your reaction was. You were given the thing you asked for, then complained. Then complained the thing wasn’t in a different format not previously specified. Like, someone was trying to be helpful without much context and you were like, “No, this is the wrong kind of help”
“This review is not comprehensive enough”
Handed review that is more comprehensive
“This review is too comprehensive and also I have to wait for an extra thing they do as a bonus”
Quite the take
We have literally no way of knowing. Even if you specified the category of Casio product, it would be impossible. How do we know what you don’t know?
I 100% get where you’re coming from. I don’t even disagree that it is a simple excuse to ignore responsibility. From experience, I know police departments simply don’t care about that. Look at Seattle Police. They spent 13 years under federal oversight, marginally improved, then the feds ended it, despite still being incredibly horrible to non-white, non-straight people.
It didn’t. Not defending these fascists, but the sooner we can move past the “republicans are all closeted” trope the better. Caelan Conrad did a great breakdown https://youtu.be/GHeAJPbx0SI
I don’t that level of faith in the court, especially the SCOTUS, to have that level of optimism.
I understand it is unconstitutional. My point is that it simply does not matter to the cops. Again, the easier thing is to not have cameras at all. Systems can be circumvented. Not having the cameras at all makes it so nobody can abuse them. Mass surveillance is not necessary or good.
Stalking is also illegal. Doesn’t seem to stop them
Should, yes, but they won’t. Cops in the US are some of the most corrupt people. The simpler and safer solution is to not have the cameras at all. Mass surveillance is never the answer
Considering the ridiculous amount of stalking from cops using these cameras, no, I don’t think people would be OK with only local cops having access
I dunno, at first pass it seems really slut shamey, then at another it seems to take the stance that monogamy is the “right” way to do relationships. “Of course they caught and STD, they have multiple partners, duh.” It is boomer humor
It wasn’t half the country, it was half of the people that voted, and voter turnout was 63.7%. I am always annoyed by this particular argument because the republicans are doing so much to disenfranchise voters. They are wild unpopular, they are also wildly corrupt. Not that dems are better, mind you, but painting half the country as racist fascists is just plain wrong