I have been using Bitwarden for around 7~ years. Subscription for this long too, at 10USD p/year. I will be switching due to lack of transparency, and would love to hear others thoughts on this.

The linked article goes into further detail, but here is a small summary that very much concern me / are sus:

  • that 10USD per year has gone up quietly . I just checked and I have no email telling me it’s increased. It renews in like 2 months, so this is good timing for me
  • Originally Bitwarden had values as apart of the acronym “GRIT”. Gratitude, Responsibility, Inclusion, and Transparency. They have changed the last two words to “Innovation, Trust”
  • There is now a new CEO, this was not announced and the only reason people outside of Bitwarden know is that someone saw this change on LinkedIn
  • The free tier momentarily disappeared from their product page for about a month (april14-may14). People were likely still able to make free accounts during this period. Bitwarden says it was a marketing mistake

The price hike is one thing, but for me the acronym change is most concerning, which is why I will be looking at another password manger (probably keepassxc)

  • The CEO apparently is a big private equity guy, and those bloodsucking ticks only know how to do one thing: Suck every last drop of money and goodwill from the company and its customers as quickly as possible.

    Breaks my heart, I’ve been a massive Bitwarden advocate for years. Been happily paying for the individual paid plan. I’m now working on setting up KeyPassXC with syncthing.

  • Yeah, I switched to KeePass for the same reason. The only way I trust software is if they’ll show me the code, and the only reason to replace “transparency” with “trust” IMHO is because they want to go closed source. Innovation also tends to just mean 'we’re going to be charging you for features that used to be free ’

      • Not really, just had to install KeePass on my computer and export my bitwarden passwords BW makes that easy to do) and import them to KeePass. I haven’t set up the browser extension yet, as at a glance it says it doesn’t work with browsers installed with flatpak and that’s how I have LibreWolf installed. Setting up syncthing was also pretty straightforward.

        • Tekdeb ( tekdeb@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I tested this a few weeks ago, but one thing I struggled with was having custom fields imported. Don’t know if I somehow did something wrong, but while the export data had them as expected, KeePassXC just didn’t import it all? The standard Notes did get imported, but none of my custom fields.

  • myrmidex ( myrmidex@belgae.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 months ago

    Totally agree. I’ve been a multi-year paying customer of bitwarden for the family, always happy with their service, especially when compared with the 1pass I use at work. But that CEO avatar picture alone gives me enough bad vibes, let alone his credentials, the acronym change, so yea I too reckon I’ve been putting off the switch long enough now.

    I came from keepass, can’t go back there, even if I now have syncthing set up everywhere. Also, how would that work for the family, you force everyone to set up their own file and hope they manage it well? Highly doubtful.

    I saw aliasvault pop up too, this last week. Haven’t looked into it yet, and although a great contender, it’s probably too young to seriously consider.

    These are the alternatives according to selfh.st/apps :

    • Vaultwarden
    • Password Pusher
    • KeePassXC
    • Passbolt
    • Infisical
    • OpenBao
    • YeetFile
    • AliasVault
    • OrigamiVault

    Anyone here had some bad experiences with any of these?

    • lime! ( lime@feddit.nu ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      vaultwarden allows you to keep using the bitwarden client i think, just with your own server. should be the most seamless for the family.

        • LedgeDrop ( LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’d asked a similar question. Basically, the response I got was: if the something goes sideways, the community can hard fork all their clients and use vaultwarden as a server (their current licenses would allow that).

          Another suggestion was that you can always use the web ui bundled with vaultwarden directly (heh, I’ve been using vaultwarden for years and I don’t think I ever used the web ui - just the applications, CLI, browser extension).

      • myrmidex ( myrmidex@belgae.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good point, that is a big factor indeed, ease of migration. Vaultwarden should get bonus points for this, so I’ll be sure to add it to the list of alternatives to try out. Thanks!

    • oats ( oats@piefed.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Switched from keepassxc to vaultwarden a while ago (mostly due to the horrible syncing experience, and to use the same password manager as my family so I could help out better).

      It’s a selfhosted and open source version of the Bitwarden server, you’ll use the (open source) Bitwarden clients. So its all features of Bitwarden plus full transparency

        • oats ( oats@piefed.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, the clients (Desktop, Web, Browser, Mobile, CLI) are published by Bitwarden under GPL3 license, so you can always fork them.

          Bitwarden could delete the repos, but the code is out there.

      • myrmidex ( myrmidex@belgae.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        still in beta

        any idea when they will release a major version?

        Is AliasVault here for the long term?

        Yes. We build AliasVault with a long-term vision, not with a quick exit in mind. The product is never “done”; we keep developing, improving, and refining AliasVault continuously to give users the best possible experience over the long term.

        Our spiritual predecessor, SpamOK.com, has been running since 2013. That is more than 13 years of uninterrupted service helping people fight spam and protect their privacy online. The same long-term mindset applies to AliasVault.

        That does inspire confidence, so I’ll add it to the list!

    • kittenroar ( kittenroar@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      vaultwarden has an uncertain future with the new bitwarden management – we would need bitwarden apps that use vaultwarden apis rather than bitwarden. I suppose if bitwarden breaks api compatibility that might happen.

      KeepPassXC is what I was using before – it’s like keepass. It has browser integration, but syncing is problematic, and it doesn’t have biometric unlock.

  • undu ( undu@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    It got bought by a company owned by Vista Equity partners, a private equity firm.

    The loss of values happened at Citrix when it was Vought by Vista. They installed Tom Krauseasthe CEO to gut it from the inside out.

    Everybody should have an exit plan ready to be able to leave bitwarden

  • Allero ( Allero@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you or someone you trust happen to have a home server, just install Vaultwarden, which is the community fork of Bitwarden without any fees, shady stuff or reliance on Bitwarden infrastructure.

      • trilobite ( trilobite@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well, when u say supereasy to set up, i don’t know. The need for reverse proxy was driving me nuts. For someone that doesn’t expose anything to the outside world, the need for a reverse proxy is overkill in my opinion. But i did hive up fairly easily, so i’ll have another go in the future when i have time. For now my Syncthing + Keepass setup will have to do but i do find its not 100% robust. If i have keepass open on both mobile and laptop, i’m at risk of loosing changes. If the change is made on one device and i close after change, i won’t see the change until i close keepass on the other device. But by then syncthing thinks that the latter is the most recent change and marks the file of first device as conflict file. So the chsnge is not lost but its not in the most “recent” version of the database.

        • Jason2357 ( Jason2357@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you have several, it really is convenient to set up an internal reverse proxy for all your internal-only services. One place to set up let’s encrypt and set up subdomains or different paths for the different services. No need for URLs with different port numbers or IP addresses.

    • I know this options exists, but honestly I don’t think I have reliable enough infrastructure. It’s hardly ever offline, but my backup game is super weak, and I have had to rebuild from scratch once in the past three years.

      What happens if I fuck up again and have to rebuild? Just feels like a massive potential failure point.

      • Auli ( Auli@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Your backup is all your clients. Every client has a blob. If you loose it export and then import. That is if everything else fails.

      • Allero ( Allero@lemmy.today ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bitwarden app is fully compatible with Vaultwarden and stores copies of all your passwords for offline access, so as long as you have access to the app somewhere, you’ll have them.

        Also, Bitwarden can export your passwords as a file in several formats, readable by Bitwarden, KeePassXC etc. You can have that stored somewhere safe.

  • Libb ( Libb@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    In the same boat as you.

    I don’t like how it’s changing, I also don’t like how the UI is changing and, sadly, as a EU citizen I can’t trust it any longer since it is made in the USA.

    But I’m no hurry to switch. I mean, I won’t rush or worry about paying one more year subscription if I have to. I’ll try alternatives as long as I have too. So far, there is

    • the Canadian 1Password and
    • the non-synced/local but free to use KeepassXC that are standing out.

    Both work with Linux.

  • BrilliantBadger ( BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Migrated to Keepass shortly before the price increase ( not because of it) just for the reason of wanting my vault fully offline. Seeing these changes at BW still makes me sad, was a long time paying user & truly enjoyed it

    Keepass is fantastiic, my vault is pretty static so just manually copy to other device as needed. And of course, have your full backup plan in place as with all things

  • RiQuY ( RiQuY@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I guess it’s time to move on, I’ll check PrivacyGuides for a better alternative while I compare by myself too.

    I’m not gonna allow a quiet price hike, this is scummy and anti-consumer.

  • kittenroar ( kittenroar@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Bitwarden was taken over by private equity just before these changes btw

    price almost doubled; it’s $19.80 a year now. Still cheaper than 1pass or lastpass, which are $3/month. I don’t think they would increase to that much, because 1pass is objectively better.

      • clb92 ( clb92@feddit.dk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Was LastPass open source to the same degree that Bitwarden is? It’s super easy to run your own Vaultwarden server already, and it shouldn’t be a problem for the community to fork and maintain unofficial clients either. Doesn’t seem like there’s much Bitwarden as a company could do about that, even if they wanted to.

            • BakedCatboy ( BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah for sure, I’m just thinking that it can be a little rocky to get governance and contribution processes set up, sometimes those last minute forks flop because the person who decided to advertise their fork ends up being ill equipped to handle running the project. If we can get a libre warden client project working before hand then it’ll make the process a lot more seamless when issues with bitwarden arise.