• 14 Posts
  • 305 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 1st, 2023

help-circle
rss




  • Big agree on all of that, including the Any Austin recommendation!

    Skyrim is amazing for this kind of mindfulness with its environments. The NPCs are a little so-so (once you spend an extended amount of time at the same location) but you can’t go wrong with setting up campfire and just taking in the wilderness and everything around you. X4 Foundations actually is pretty great, too, for this vibe-intake, when you land on a station and just exist (or sneak into another captain’s ship and see where it takes you)




  • I don’t know how strictly your lessons are monitored, but if they aren’t, you might be able to deviate from your curriculum sometimes, especially if all of your students are on the same side as you. This field manual is a great start for teaching creative civil resistance against an oppressive regime while minimising the likelihood that the resistor loses their job doing so.

    As a teacher you wield the power to shape young people in a magnitude that is only topped by direct family and best friends. Use it wisely, while making sure to stay on curriculum enough that your students still pass their mandatory exams.








  • Samesies!


    One very important word of caution (unfortunately coming from experience): Syncthing, as the name suggests, makes it so the content of one device is the same as that of another device. So, even if you have one device set to only receive data, it means that if you delete a file from the sending device, the receiving device will also delete that file to stay in sync with the sending device.

    There is a way to use Syncthing as a simple backup storage program (not necessarily the best solution but much better than manually backing up your files every few months and just hoping for the best). But it means that you have to use the advanced folder option “ignoreDelete”. I also use the file versioning system, so even if something is automatically deleted by mistake, it’s still versioned in a special subfolder and accessible to me.


  • Couldn’t you just add up the germs found in successive swabs to the total and increase the total count with each test?

    I’m not quite sure I understand the method you’re describing 😅


    When it comes to microbiological contamination, there are a couple of factors that can make a tremendous difference. For example, the base material that the machine is made of. Up to 1980, 1990, maybe even the early 2000s, many machines were still made of steel only, instead of stainless steel, and so they needed a layer of paint to make sure that they don’t start rusting, especially in food production, which often times uses water in the production process and in the cleaning process. One disadvantage of this is that the paint at some point will start cracking and splintering off creating foreign bodies that can contaminate your product as well as creating rough textures surfaces that are perfect for germs to snuggle into.

    Also, since the hygiene requirements on food were not as strict in the past, machines from that time may not have been designed with regular deep cleaning in mind. Most modern production plants have a Cleaning In Place procedure which allows to properly clean the insides of the machines with no or minimal disassembly.

    Another factor is the design of pipes and tanks. If you have sharp 90 degree turns in your pipes or if your tank has no outflow hole on the lowest point (you can sometimes see it with beer kegs, where the tap is stuck in somewhere in the lowest eighth of the keg instead of actually on the very bottom), liquids will accumulate there and that will turn stale.

    There are more factors that make hygienic production according to today’s standards more difficult in some older machines than in newer ones, but these are the ones that come to my mind right away.



  • Hahaha the production lead actually suggested that I might have been sick and coughed germs onto the sample sponge or that the sponges themselves were already contaminated during manufacturing, because every single sample showed high counts of pseudomonas.

    Maybe instead she should start listening to us when we tell her that production equipment from 1970 might not be sufficient to run a food production with the hygiene requirements of today. But no, replacing that would cost more money than just taking samples over and over until the results are low enough (probably because by the 37th swab I cleaned the surface better than the production workers)



  • Thanks for the explanation. I don’t understand enough about large language models to give a valuable judgement on this whole Deepseek happening from a technical standpoint. I think it’s excellent to have competition on the market and it feels that the US’ whole “But they’re spying on you and being a national security risk” is a hypocritical outcry when Facebook, OpenAI and the like still exist.

    What do you think about Deepseek? If I understood correctly, it’s being trained on the output of other LLMs, which makes it much more cheap but, to me it seems, also even less trustworthy because now all the actual human training data is missing and instead it’s a bunch of hallucinations, lies and (hopefully more often than not) correctly guessed answers to questions made by humans.